Cited by 381Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsDelphi Technique in Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement

Open access

Husereau, Don, Drummond, Michael, Petrou, Stavros, Carswell, Chris, Moher, David, Greenberg, Dan, Augustovski, Federico, Briggs, Andrew H, Mauskopf, Josephine, Loder, Elizabeth, on behalf of the CHEERS Task Force·2013·Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-11-6PMC PMC3607888

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Economic evaluations of health interventions pose a particular challenge for reporting. There is also a need to consolidate and update existing guidelines and promote their use in a user friendly manner. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement is an attempt to consolidate and update previous health economic evaluation guidelines efforts into one current, useful reporting guidance. The primary audiences for the CHEERS statement are researchers reporting economic evaluations and the editors and peer reviewers assessing them for publication.The need for new reporting guidance was identified by a survey of medical editors. A list of possible items based on a systematic review was created. A two round, modified Delphi panel consisting of representatives from academia, clinical practice, industry, government, and the editorial community was conducted. Out of 44 candidate items, 24 items and accompanying recommendations were developed. The recommendations are contained in a user friendly, 24 item checklist. A copy of the statement, accompanying checklist, and this report can be found on the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluations Publication Guidelines Task Force website (http://www.ispor.org/TaskForces/EconomicPubGuidelines.asp).We hope CHEERS will lead to better reporting, and ultimately, better health decisions. To facilitate dissemination and uptake, the CHEERS statement is being co-published across 10 health economics and medical journals. We encourage other journals and groups, to endorse CHEERS. The author team plans to review the checklist for an update in five years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1478-7547-11-6

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figure 1 Forms of economic evaluation.CC BY · PubMed Central

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Self-citation
Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
(1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195108248.001.0001 · Cited by 7,193
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., & Loder, E. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002 · Cited by 1,998
Self-citation
Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ
Drummond, M. F., & Jefferson, T. O. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275 · Cited by 1,827
Self-citation
Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Simera, I., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217 · Cited by 1,437
Self-citation
Recommendations for Reporting Cost-effectiveness Analyses
Siegel, J. E. (1996) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540160061034 · Cited by 1,147
Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
Siegel, J. E. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.276.16.1339 · Cited by 1,040
Good Research Practices for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials: The ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force Report
Ramsey, S. D., Willke, R. J., Briggs, A. H., Brown, R. E., Buxton, M. J., Chawla, A., Cook, J. R., Glick, H. A., Liljas, B., Petitti, D. B., et al. (2005) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00045.x · Cited by 720
Self-citation
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa
Turner, L., Shamseer, L., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., & Moher, D. (2012) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-60 · Cited by 628
Self-citation
Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions
Drummond, M., Schwartz, J. S., Jönsson, B., Luce, B. R., Neumann, P. J., Siebert, U., & Sullivan, S. D. (2008) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462308080343 · Cited by 489
Self-citation

Show all 25 references

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 377

Economic Evaluation of Public Health Interventions: An Application to Interventions for the Prevention of Violence Against Women and Girls Implemented by the “What Works to Prevent Violence Against Women and Girls?” Global Program
Ferrari, G., Rueda, S. T., Michaels-Igbokwe, C., Watts, C. H., Jewkes, R. K., & Vassall, A. (2019) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260519885118 · Cited by 10
“Both sets of guidelines are designed for global health and are consistent with the Second U.S. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (Neumann et al., 2016) and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) guidelines (Husereau et al., 2013).”
Method
Cost evaluation of temporary abdominal closure methods in abdominal sepsis patients successfully treated with an open abdomen. Should we take temporary abdominal closure methods at face value? Health economic evaluation
Betancourt, A. S., Milagros, G. C., Alvarez, P. S., Fernández, L. G., & Norwood, S. H. (2020) · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.007 · Cited by 10
CHEERS to Updated Guidelines for Reporting Health Economic Evaluations!
Willke, R. J., & Pizzi, L. T. (2022) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1350 · Cited by 10
Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Cost-Utility of a Digital Alcohol Moderation Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Health Economic Evaluation and Outcomes of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Mujcic, A., Blankers, M., Boon, B. J. F., Berman, A. H., Riper, H. M., van Laar, M., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/30095 · Cited by 9
“An economic evaluation was conducted alongside the RCT in concordance with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards Statement [39] and following the approach by Drummond et al [40].”
Supporting good quality, community-based end-of-life care for people living with dementia: the SEED research programme including feasibility RCT
Robinson, L. A., Poole, M., McLellan, E., Lee, R. P., Amador, S., Bhattarai, N., Bryant, A., Coe, D., Corbett, A., Exley, C., et al. (2020) · Programme Grants for Applied Research · doi:10.3310/pgfar08080 · Cited by 10
Autonomy-Supportive Interventions
Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.035 · Cited by 13
An economic evaluation of the randomized controlled trial of topical corticosteroid and home‐based narrowband ultraviolet B for active and limited vitiligo (the HI‐Light Vitiligo Trial)*
Sach, T., Thomas, K. S., Batchelor, J., Akram, P., Chalmers, J. R., Haines, R., Meakin, G., Duley, L., Ravenscroft, J., Rogers, A., et al. (2020) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.19554 · Cited by 9
Economic evaluations of interventions against influenza at workplaces: systematic review
Ofori, S. K., Hung, Y. W., Schwind, J. S., Diallo, K., Babatunde, D., Nwaobi, S. O., Hua, X., Sullivan, K. L., Cowling, B. J., Chowell, G., et al. (2021) · Occupational Medicine · doi:10.1093/occmed/kqab163 · Cited by 9
Tuberculosis (TB) Aftermath: study protocol for a hybrid type I effectiveness-implementation non-inferiority randomized trial in India comparing two active case finding (ACF) strategies among individuals treated for TB and their household contacts
Cox, S. R., Kadam, A. B., Atre, S. R., Gupte, A., Sohn, H., Gupte, N., Sawant, T., Mhadeshwar, V., Thompson, R. R., Kendall, E. A., et al. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06503-6 · Cited by 11
“Accepted methodological guidelines will be followed for the conduct, and reporting of the cost-effectiveness analysis [92–94].”
Cost-effectiveness of interventions to reduce the risk of healthcare-acquired infections in middle-income countries: A systematic review
Gamalathge, P. U., Kularatna, S., Carter, H. E., Senanayake, S. J., & Graves, N. (2019) · Journal of Infection Prevention · doi:10.1177/1757177419852662 · Cited by 9
“The quality of the methods and reporting of the studies was assessed by considering data extracted against the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) reporting checklist (Supplementary File 1) (Husereau et al., 2013).”
Method
Cost Comparison of In-Suite Versus Portable Tunneled Femoral Central Line Placements in Children Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing
Hayatghaibi, S. E., Chau, A., Wadler, E. G., Levine, M. H., Hernandez, A. J., & Orth, R. C. (2019) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2019.11.004 · Cited by 9
Implementation Science and Translation in Behavior Change
Łuszczyńska, A., Łobczowska, K., & Horodyska, K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.023 · Cited by 10
An economic evaluation of pit and fissure sealants and fluoride varnishes in preventing dental caries: a systematic review
Zhang, B., Zhao, M., Duan, S., Tian, J., Lei, L., & Huang, R. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry · doi:10.22514/jocpd.2023.048 · Cited by 9
“Unlike clinical studies that report the consequences of the intervention only, economic evaluations require more reporting items, such as resources used„ costs, and effectiveness results [23].”
Background
Effectiveness of a personal health coaching intervention (diabetescoach) in patients with type 2 diabetes: protocol for an open-label, pragmatic randomised controlled trial
Hohberg, V., Kreppke, J.-N., Kohl, J., Seelig, E., Zahner, L., Streckmann, F., Gerber, M., König, D., & Faude, O. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057948 · Cited by 9
Cost-benefit Analysis of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Mammography: A Systematic Review
Ghorbani, S., Rezapour, A., Eisavi, M., Barahman, M., & Faradonbeh, S. B. (2023) · Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · doi:10.47176/mjiri.37.89 · Cited by 8
“This checklist consists of 5 questions and 24 criteria that examine the design of each economic evaluation study in terms of title and abstract, introduction and problem statement, methodology, findings, discussion, and conclusion (13).”
Background
Cost-utility analysis of second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel versus standard of care in Japan based on the ZUMA-7 trial
Tsutsué, S., Makita, S., Asou, H., Matsuda, H., & Yamaura, R. (2024) · Future Oncology · doi:10.1080/14796694.2024.2351353 · Cited by 8
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Clinically Depressed Adolescents: Protocol for a Pragmatic Quasi-Experimental Controlled Trial
Rasing, S. P. A., Stikkelbroek, Y. A. J., Riper, H., Dekovic, M., Nauta, M. H., Dirksen, C. D., Creemers, D. H. M., & Bodden, D. H. M. (2019) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/13434 · Cited by 8
“The economic evaluation will be executed in accordance with the CHEERS (Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards) Statement [50,51], which has been successfully executed previously in an economic evaluation of treatment of anxiety disorders in children [52].”
Method
Measuring stroke and transient ischemic attack burden in New Zealand: Protocol for the fifth Auckland Regional Community Stroke Study (ARCOS V)
Feigin, V. L., Krishnamurthi, R., Barker-Collo, S. L., Barber, P. A., Rathnasabapathy, Y., Ao, B. T., Parmar, P. G. K., Mahon, S., Tunnage, B., Swain, A., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Stroke · doi:10.1177/1747493019884528 · Cited by 10
“), and out of pocket expenses associated with stroke will be analyzed in accordance with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Guidelines.(70) Incorporating productivity losses in this case is appropriate given that MOH is likely to be a major funder in treatment.”
Method
Self-Control Interventions
de Ridder, D. T. D., Gillebaart, M., & Friese, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.040 · Cited by 9
Goal Setting Interventions
Epton, T., & Armitage, C. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.038 · Cited by 8
Cost effectiveness of community led total sanitation in Ethiopia and Ghana
Crocker, J., Fuente, D., & Bartram, J. (2020) · International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113682 · Cited by 14
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a large-scale crèche intervention to prevent child drowning in rural Bangladesh
Alfonso, Y. N., Hyder, A. A., Alonge, O., Salam, S. S., Baset, K. U., Rahman, A., Hoque, D. M. E., Islam, M. I., Rahman, F., Arifeen, S. E., et al. (2021) · Injury Epidemiology · doi:10.1186/s40621-021-00351-9 · Cited by 8
“Some of the resources that should be used to achieve this is following the CHEERS guidelines for CEA studies (Husereau et al. 2013).”
Method
The cost of vaginal birth at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital setting in New South Wales: A micro-costing study
Scarf, V. L., Yu, S., Viney, R. C., Lavis, L., Dahlen, H. G., Foureur, M. J., & Homer, C. (2019) · Women and Birth · doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2019.06.003 · Cited by 8
Barriers and Facilitators to Model Replication Within Health Economics
McManus, E., Turner, D., Gray, E., Khawar, H., Okoli, T., & Sach, T. (2019) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1928 · Cited by 8
Economic evaluations of non-communicable diseases conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa: a critical review of data sources
Hollingworth, S., Leaupepe, G.-A., Nonvignon, J., Fenny, A. P., Odame, E., & Ruiz, F. J. (2023) · Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation · doi:10.1186/s12962-023-00471-7 · Cited by 7
“There are other checklists for economic evaluations, such as CHEERS and Drummond [67, 68]; we reviewed these checklists and ascertained that the important elements were captured in the general characteristics and iDSI reference case standards [15].”
Method
Evaluation of Behavior Change Interventions
Matthews, L., & Simpson, S. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.022 · Cited by 8
Evaluation of the costing methodology of published studies estimating costs of surgical site infections: A systematic review
Shaaban, R. H. A., Yassine, O. G., Bedwani, R. N., & Abu-Sheasha, G. A. (2021) · Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1017/ice.2021.381 · Cited by 7
Economic evaluation of community-based falls prevention interventions for older populations: a systematic methodological overview of systematic reviews
Kwon, J., Squires, H., Franklin, M., Lee, Y., & Young, T. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-07764-2 · Cited by 7
“The appraisal could apply a pre-established checklist for methodological/reporting quality such as the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) [19] and/or narratively synthesise methodological strengths and limitations.”
MethodInfluential
Understanding implementation costs of a pediatric weight management intervention: an economic evaluation protocol
Michaud, T. L., Hill, J. L., Heelan, K. A., Bartee, R. T., Abbey, B. M., Malmkar, A., Masker, J., Golden, C. A., Porter, G. C., Glasgow, R. E., et al. (2022) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-022-00287-1 · Cited by 7
“Overview of economic evaluation This protocol has been reported in line with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist [28] (see Supplementary File 1: CHEERS Checklist).”
Sustainability of Community-Based Specialized Mental Health Services in Five European Countries: Protocol for Five Randomized Controlled Trial–Based Health-Economic Evaluations Embedded in the RECOVER-E Program
Wijnen, B. F. M., Smit, F., Uhernik, A. I., Ištvanović, A., Đedović, J., Dinolova, R. V., Nica, R. I., Velickovski, R., Wensing, M., Petrea, I., et al. (2020) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/17454 · Cited by 7
“The above evaluations will be reported in agreement with the following pertinent guidelines: the CONSORT statement for randomized trials [27], Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement for trial-based health-economic evaluation [28], and Consolidated Framework for Advancing Impleme…”
Method
Motivational Interviewing Interventions
Berman, A. H., Beckman, M., & Lindqvist, H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.045 · Cited by 12
A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of continuous versus intermittent renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury
Singh, A., Hussain, S., Kher, V., Palmer, A. J., Jose, M., & Antony, B. (2021) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2021.1916471 · Cited by 7
Effectiveness of a coordinated support system linking public hospitals to a health coaching service compared with usual care at discharge for patients with chronic low back pain: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Ho, E. K., Ferreira, M. L., Bauman, A. E., Hodges, P. W., Maher, C. G., Simić, M., Morton, R. L., Lonsdale, C., Li, Q., Baysari, M. T., et al. (2021) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-021-04479-z · Cited by 7
A protocol for a systematic review of economic evaluation studies conducted on neonatal systemic infections in South Asia
Murthy, S., John, D., Godinho, I. P., Godinho, M. A., Guddattu, V., & Nair, N. S. (2017) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0648-7 · Cited by 6
“Trial-based economic evaluation studies: Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias [18], CHEERS statement [30], Consensus Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) Criteria list [32] and Drummond Checklist [33] Model-based economic evaluation studies: CHEERS statement [30], NICE guidelines [34] and Phillips check…”
Method
Health Technology Assessment in Epilepsy: Economic Evaluations and Preference Studies
de Kinderen, R. J. A. (2015) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20150522rk · Cited by 7
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of paramedic administered fascia iliaca compartment block for emergency hip fracture (RAPID 2)—protocol for an individually randomised parallel-group trial
Kingston, M. R., Jones, J., Black, S., Evans, B. A., Ford, S. J., Foster, T., Goodacre, S. W., Jones, M.-L., Jones, S., Keen, L., et al. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06522-3 · Cited by 6
“Health economic data analysis The health economic analysis, also by treatment allocated, will be carried out in line with the NICE guidelines on health technology appraisal and presented in accordance to the CHEERS checklist [48].”
Method
Economic and Behavioral Economic Approaches to Behavior Change
Brown, P. M., Cameron, L. D., Wilkinson, M., & Taylor, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.042 · Cited by 7
Maternal Diet Quality, Body Mass Index and Resource Use in the Perinatal Period: An Observational Study
Szewczyk, Z., Weaver, N., Rollo, M. E., Deeming, S., Holliday, E. G., Reeves, P., & Collins, C. E. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12113532 · Cited by 8
“Since the time horizon for inclusion of relevant healthcare-resource use is set at less than 12 months, conversion or discounting of costs was not required [25].”
Background
Cost-effectiveness analysis of intraoperative radiation therapy versus external beam radiation therapy for the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: A systematic review
Eisavi, M., Rezapour, A., Alipour, V., Mirzaei, H. R., & Arabloo, J. (2020) · Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · doi:10.47176/mjiri.34.167 · Cited by 6
“Included studies were then assessed using the CHEERS checklist (12, 13).”
Method
Evidence-based recommendations for economic evaluations in spine surgery: study protocol for a Delphi consensus
Droeghaag, R., Schuermans, V. N. E., Hermans, S. M. M., Smeets, A. Y. J. M., Caelers, I. J. M. H., Hiligsmann, M., van Hemert, W. L. W., Evers, S., & van Santbrink, H. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052988 · Cited by 6
Systematic review of costs and cost-effectiveness of treatment for relapsed/refractory acute leukemia in children and young adults
Soliman, R., Heneghan, C. J., Bolous, N. S., Sidhom, I., Ahmed, S., Roberts, N. W., Oke, J. L., & Elhaddad, A. (2022) · Expert Review of Hematology · doi:10.1080/17474086.2022.2069096 · Cited by 6
Value of Nonpharmacological Interventions for People With an Acquired Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations
Mitchell, E., Ahern, E., Saha, S., McGettrick, G., & Trépel, D. (2022) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.014 · Cited by 6
The Cost-Effectiveness of Adjunctive Lifestyle Interventions for the Management of Cancer: A Systematic Review
Gallagher, A., Shersher, V., Mortimer, D., Truby, H., & Haines, T. P. (2022) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-022-00759-4 · Cited by 7
“The quality of reporting in the studies was assessed by two reviewers (AG and VS) using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluating Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist [23].”
Method
One-time screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Ontario, Canada: a model-based cost-utility analysis
Vervoort, D., Hirode, G., Lindsay, T. F., Tam, D. Y., Kapila, V., & de Mestral, C. (2024) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.230913 · Cited by 6
“18”
Sourcing and Using Appropriate Health State Utility Values in Economic Models in Health Care
Ara, R., Peasgood, T., Mukuria, C., Chevrou‐Séverac, H., Rowen, D., Zouraq, I. A., Paisley, S., Young, T. A., van Hout, B., & Brazier, J. E. (2017) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-017-0543-z · Cited by 6
The Price of Prevention: Cost Effectiveness of Biomedical HIV Prevention Strategies in South Africa.
Moodley, N., Gray, G., & Bertram, M. (2016) · PubMed · Cited by 6
Cost-effectiveness of single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review of the key drivers and quality of published literature
Javan‐Noughabi, J., Rezapour, A., Hajahmadi, M., & Alipour, V. (2018) · Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health · doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2018.07.008 · Cited by 6
Is Protocolised Weaning that Includes Early Extubation Onto Non-Invasive Ventilation More Cost Effective Than Protocolised Weaning Without Non-Invasive Ventilation? Findings from the Breathe Study
collaborators, O. B. O. B., Khan, I., Maredza, M., Dritsaki, M., Mistry, D., Lall, R., Lamb, S. E., Couper, K., Gates, S., Perkins, G. D., et al. (2020) · PharmacoEconomics - Open · doi:10.1007/s41669-020-00210-1 · Cited by 6
“Reporting was made in line with the CHEERS statement [32].”
MethodSelf-citation
Changing Behavior Using Integrative Self-Control Theory
Hofmann, W., Dohle, S., & Diel, K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.011 · Cited by 7
Elective neck dissection versus positron emission tomography–computed tomography–guided management of the neck in clinically node‐negative early oral cavity cancer: A cost–utility analysis
Noel, C. W., Forner, D. W. A., Goldstein, D. P., Metser, U., Ferris, R. L., Waldron, J. N., & de Almeida, J. R. (2021) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.33446 · Cited by 6
Cost-Effectiveness of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review
Rezapour, A., Alipour, V., Moradi, N., & Arabloo, J. (2022) · Value in Health Regional Issues · doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2021.10.007 · Cited by 6
Health Technology Optimization Analysis: Conceptual Approach and Illustrative Application
Yan, C., Zheng, Y., Hill, M. D., Mann, B., Jeerakathil, T., Kamal, N. R., Amlani, S., & Chuck, A. W. (2018) · MDM Policy & Practice · doi:10.1177/2381468318774804 · Cited by 6
Affect-Based Interventions
Conner, M. T., Williams, D. M., & Rhodes, R. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.034 · Cited by 6
How Should Economic Analyses Inform Nosocomial Infection Control?
Mylonakis, E. E., & Ziakas, P. D. (2021) · The AMA Journal of Ethic · doi:10.1001/amajethics.2021.631 · Cited by 5
The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the PAtient-Centred Team (PACT) model: study protocol of a prospective matched control before-and-after study
Bergmo, T. S., Berntsen, G., Dalbakk, M., & Rumpsfeld, M. (2015) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0133-x · Cited by 6
“The economic evaluation will be conducted in accordance with the CHEERS statement [49].”
Method
A rapid intrapartum test for group B Streptococcus to reduce antibiotic usage in mothers with risk factors: the GBS2 cluster RCT
DANIELS, J. P., Dixon, E. F., Gill, A., Bishop, J., D’Amico, M., Ahmed, K., Dodds, J. P., Tryposkiadis, K., Wilks, M., Millar, M., et al. (2022) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/bicf1187 · Cited by 5
The economic value of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers
Bolas, T., Werner, K., Alkenbrack, S., Uribe, M. V., Wang, M., & Risko, N. (2023) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0002043 · Cited by 5
“We developed two separate decision-analytic models to compare the costs and effects of two PPE use scenarios for protection of HCW against [1] Ebola and [2] MRSA, following standard guidelines for cost-effectiveness analyses and adhering to Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) [17, 18].”
Method
Advocating uniformity in spine surgery: a practical disease-specific guideline for trial-based economic evaluations
Schuermans, V. N. E., Droeghaag, R., Hermans, S. M. M., Smeets, A. Y. J. M., Caelers, I. J. M. H., Hiligsmann, M., van Hemert, W. L. W., Evers, S., & van Santbrink, H. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073535 · Cited by 6
Cost of treating severe malaria in children in Africa: a systematic literature review
Mori, A. T., Mallange, G., Kühl, M.-J., & Okell, L. (2024) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-024-05173-w · Cited by 5
How to Report a Research Study
Cronin, P., Rawson, J. V., Heilbrun, M. E., Lee, J. M., Kelly, A. M., Sanelli, P. C., Bresnahan, B. W., & Paladin, A. M. (2014) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2014.04.016 · Cited by 5
Iniciativas Disponibles para el Reporte de Resultados en Investigación Biomédica con Diferentes Tipos de Diseño
Manterola, C., Otzen, T., Lorenzini, N., Díaz, A., Torres-Quevedo, R., & Claros, N. (2013) · International Journal of Morphology · doi:10.4067/s0717-95022013000300029 · Cited by 4
Addressing Underserved Populations and Disparities in Behavior Change
Schüz, B., & Hooper, M. W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.027 · Cited by 5
Cost-Effectiveness of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared with Enalapril in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review
Rezapour, A., Azari, S., Arabloo, J., Kolivand, P., Behzadifar, M., Omidi, N., Asiabar, A. S., Saberian, P., Pourasghari, H., Bragazzi, N. L., et al. (2023) · The Journal of Tehran University Heart Center · doi:10.18502/jthc.v17i4.11603 · Cited by 5
Evaluation of an innovative mHealth-based integrated modality for smoking cessation in Chinese smokers: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Chu, S., Lin, F., Zuo, Y., Jing, H., Zhang, D., Tong, Z., Ju, S., Ma, H., Zhang, Z., & Liang, L. (2023) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-023-15448-7 · Cited by 5
“[45] and in concordance with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement [46].”
Result
An Economic Evaluation of Australia's Newborn Hearing Screening Program: A Within-Study Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Sharma, R., Gu, Y., Sinha, K., Ching, T. Y. C., Marnane, V., Gold, L. H., Wake, M. A., Wang, J., & Parkinson, B. (2022) · PubMed · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000001153 · Cited by 4
“The reporting of this evaluation follows the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards guidelines (Husereau et al. 2013) (see Supplemental Table 5 in Supplemental Digital Content 9, http://links.lww.com/EANDH/ A946).”
Method
A pragmatic approach to estimating the cost to deliver and participate in implementation strategies
Cheng, H. L., Magid, M. A., McGovern, M. P., Ford, J. H., Manja, V., Garneau, H. C., & Wagner, T. H. (2025) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-025-01459-y · Cited by 6
“This economic evaluation aligns with the guidance on the Consoli-dated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) [19] checklist (Supplementary File 1).”
Changing Behavior in the Digital Age
Kavanagh, D. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.029 · Cited by 4
Centralising acute stroke care within clinical practice in the Netherlands: lower bounds of the causal impact
Freriks, R., Mierau, J. O., Buskens, E., Pizzo, E., Luijckx, G. J., van der Zee, D.-J., & Lahr, M. M. H. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-4959-3 · Cited by 4
“We acknowledge that a full cost-utility analysis requires to adopt the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) [40].”
MethodInfluential
Cost-effectiveness of intensive interventions compared to standard care in individuals with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and critical appraisal of decision-analytic models
Usman, M., Khunti, K. K., Davies, M. J., & Gillies, C. L. (2020) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108073 · Cited by 4
Statements, Recommendations, Proposals, Guidelines, Checklists and Scales Available for Reporting Results in Biomedical Research and Quality of Conduct. A Systematic Review
Otzen, T., Manterola, C., Mora, M., Quiroz, G., Salazar, P., & García, N. (2020) · International Journal of Morphology · doi:10.4067/s0717-95022020000300774 · Cited by 7
Cost-effectiveness of mass drug administration for control of scabies in Ethiopia: a decision-analytic model
Hounsome, N., Yirgu, R., Middleton, J., Cassell, J., Fekadu, A., & Davey, G. (2024) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2024.1279762 · Cited by 3
“The model was developed using the recommended methods (16 – 18) and reported according to Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) (19).”
Method
Cost Analysis of Breast Cancer Diagnostic Assessment Programs
Honein-AbouHaidar, G. N., Hoch, J. S., Dobrow, M., Stuart-McEwan, T., McCready, D. R., & Gagliardi, A. R. (2017) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3747/co.24.3608 · Cited by 3
Cost–consequence analysis of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 92/22 mcg for the management of COPD in the Spanish NHS
Vallejo-Aparicio, L. A., Peces‐Barba, G., Gil, A., & Hernández, A. H. (2018) · ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research · doi:10.2147/ceor.s169154 · Cited by 3
Diagnostic Assessment Reviews: is cost-effectiveness analysis helpful or necessary?
Mistry, H., & Mason, J. M. (2018) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/1355819618787215 · Cited by 3
A comparative study of the cost and uptake of community pharmacy “Stop Smoking and Emergency Contraception” services from the perspective of the National Health Service
Kayyali, R., Chalati, W., Crilly, P., & Fletcher, J. G. (2020) · Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_20_35 · Cited by 3
“The authors have reported the findings of the study following the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement.[33] In addition, while this study was conducted before the publication of the review article by Elliott et al.”
Method
The health and economic impact of implementation strategies for improving detection of hereditary cancer patients—protocol for an in-depth cost-effectiveness evaluation with microsimulation modelling
Morrow, A., Parkinson, B., Kang, Y., Hogden, E., Canfell, K., & Taylor, N. J. (2020) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-020-00058-w · Cited by 3
Aspects of economic costs and evaluation of health surveillance systems after a radiation accident with a focus on an ultrasound thyroid screening programme for children
Albani, V., Vale, L. D., Pearce, M. S., Ostroumova, E., & Liutsko, L. (2021) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106571 · Cited by 3
“At the same time, very few studies have undertaken a cost-utility or a cost-benefit analyses (World Health Organization, 2005; Husereau, 2013) that include other direct costs and indirect costs to surveillance participants and to other members of society that are directly or indirectly affected by the surveillance act…”
Background
Análise dos custos diretos e indiretos da COVID-19 em um hospital brasileiro
Xavier, C., Oliveira, L., Lucchetta, R. C., Forgerini, M., Fantini, A. B., de Nadai, T. R., Wiens, A., & Mastroianni, P. D. C. (2022) · Jornal Brasileiro de Economia da Saúde · doi:10.21115/jbes.v14.suppl2.p135-45 · Cited by 3
Understanding the costs and the cost structure of a community-based HIV and gender-based violence (GBV) prevention program: the Woza Asibonisane Community Responses Program in South Africa
Larson, B. A., Cele, R., Girdwood, S. J., Long, L. C., & Miot, J. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05385-1 · Cited by 3
Producción científica latinoamericana en economía de la salud, 2005-2014
Vera, V., Garcia-Yu, I. A., la Cruz-Oré, J. D., Atamari‐Anahui, N., & Rubio, V. O. (2017) · Salud Pública de México · doi:10.21149/8628 · Cited by 3
The Case for Rights-Based Investments in Adolescent Girls in Kenya: An Economic Modelling StudyPreprint
Rudgard, W. E., Desmond, C., Obiesie, S., Grueso, H., Bandyopadhyay, R., Watt, K., Yates, R. E., Asuma, B. S., Leite, L., Eltigani, B., et al. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4796783 · Cited by 3
Revisão e proposta para atualização da diretriz metodológica de análise de impacto orçamentário de tecnologia em saúde para o SUS
da Costa, M. R., Luna, L., Leite, P. H., Tura, B. R., Pinto, M., & Santos, M. (2019) · Jornal Brasileiro de Economia da Saúde · doi:10.21115/jbes.v11.n1.p73-86 · Cited by 2
Changing Behavior Using Control Theory
Mansell, W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.009 · Cited by 11
The optimal diagnostic strategies for patient with coronary artery diseases and stable chest pain syndrome: a cost-effectiveness analysis
Jafari, P., Goudarzi, R., Amiresmaili, M., & Rashidinejad, H. (2020) · The Egyptian Heart Journal · doi:10.1186/s43044-020-00111-y · Cited by 2
“The most commonly used form of economic evaluation is the cost-effectiveness analysis [11].”
Method
Cost-effectiveness analysis of fractional flow reserve versus angiography among patients with coronary artery disease undergoing borderline coronary lesions treatment in Iran
Keshavarz, K., Rezaee, R., esmaili, E., Mansouri, R., Jafari, A., Erami, A., Talebianpour, H., Fonseca, R. C., & Fardid, M. (2022) · Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation · doi:10.1186/s12962-022-00402-y · Cited by 2
“The present study followed the CHEERS (Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standard) checklist [13].”
Method
Affordable Cardiac Rehabilitation An Outreach Inter-Disciplinary Strategic Study (ACROSS) – Research Programme Protocol
Taylor, R. S., Chaudhry, I. B., Faruque, M., Jeemon, P., Blakemore, A., Lovell, K., Husain, N., Saghir, T., Mashreky, S. R., Harikrishnan, S., et al. (2025) · NIHR Open Research · doi:10.3310/nihropenres.13957.1 · Cited by 3
“Recent guidance on conducting economic evaluations in LMIC settings reported by the National Institute of Care Excellence (NICE) International 44 will be adhered to as well as reporting standards such as the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement 45 .”
Assessment of the quality and trend of reporting of health economic evaluation research in India
Karekar, S. R., & Shetty, Y. C. (2020) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2021.1858055 · Cited by 2
“However, CHEERS suggest mentioning it as zero if not applied [8].”
Background
A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Studies Looking into the Economic Evaluation of Control Strategies for Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis and Schistosomiasis
Garcia, F. B., Halton-Balcon, K., Graves, N., Leonardo, L., Magalhães, R. J. S., Clements, A., & Yakob, L. (2019) · Acta Medica Philippina · doi:10.47895/amp.v53i1.217 · Cited by 2
“) (8,11), and the remaining five studies in terms of setting (e.”
BackgroundInfluential
Behavior Change in Community Contexts
Trickett, E. J., & Paterson, S. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.028 · Cited by 2
Cost and clinical benefit of imaging surveillance after treatment for breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL)
O’Connell, R. L., Sharma, B., Kerckhoven, L. V., Mehdi, A. S., Marshall, C., Wotherspoon, A. C., Iyengar, S., El‐Sharkawi, D., Attygalle, A. D., Jürgensen-Rauch, A., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.463 · Cited by 2
Cost–consequence analysis of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol for asthma management in Spain: an analysis based on the Salford Lung Study in asthma
Vallejo-Aparicio, L. A., Molina, J., Ojanguren, Í., Casas, A. V., Huerta, A., & Svedsäter, H. (2019) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-019-01101-x · Cited by 2
The Feasibility Study: A Health Economics Perspective
Gannon, B. (2017) · Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.5301/grhta.5000254 · Cited by 12
Health technology assessment of hyperphosphatemia management among hemodialysis patients in Lebanon
Rizk (2017) · doi:10.26481/dis.20170622rr · Cited by 2
Standardised Data on Initiatives – STARDIT: Beta VersionPreprint
Nunn, J., & Shafee, T. M. A. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/w5xj6 · Cited by 2
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations of Behavior Change Interventions
Wang, T., Downes, M., Byrnes, J., & Scuffham, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.026 · Cited by 1
Cost-Effectiveness of the New 2018 American College of Physicians Glycemic Control Guidance Statements Among US Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
Shao, H., Laxy, M., Gregg, E. W., Albright, A. L., & Zhang, P. (2020) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2020.09.010 · Cited by 1
Cost and cost-effectiveness of treatments for rheumatic heart disease in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
Mona Thangamma, A. G., Vidyadharan, B., Daniel, R. P., Sirur, A. J. N., Kumar, P., Girish Thunga, P., Poojari, P. G., Rashid, M., Mukherjee, N., Bhattacharya, P., et al. (2024) · JBI Evidence Synthesis · doi:10.11124/jbies-23-00246 · Cited by 1
Tū Whakaruruhau: the evaluation of treatment outcomes for methamphetamine dependence in Aotearoa, New Zealand – study protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study and longitudinal qualitative study
Newcombe, D. A. L., de Fossard, S., McKetin, R., Nosa, V. H., Parag, V., Poa, T. R., Ramalho, R., Ao, B. T., Sheridan, J. L., Walters, C., et al. (2025) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13233-3 · Cited by 1
“If feasible, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted under the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Guidelines [46] to examine the likely impact of methamphetamine treatment aimed at reducing meth-amphetamine use and related harms in the New Zealand context.”
ROI Analysis: Art or Science?
Pokhrel, S., Owen, L., Coyle, K., & Coyle, D. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68897-8_3 · Cited by 1
Rotational thromboelastometry in the perioperative period of cardiac surgeries: cost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact
Santos, A. S., Oliveira, A., Fernandes, M. L., Nogueira, J. L., Noronha, K., & Andrade, M. V. (2020) · Jornal Brasileiro de Economia da Saúde · doi:10.21115/jbes.v12.n3.p173-88 · Cited by 1

Authors: Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., Loder, E., & on behalf of the CHEERS Task Force
Affiliations: Institute of Health Economics (CA)
University of York (GB)
University of Warwick (GB)
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
University of Glasgow (GB)
RTI Health Solutions (US)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author: Husereau, Don
ORCID: Husereau, Don
Drummond, Michael
Petrou, Stavros
Carswell, Chris
Moher, David
Greenberg, Dan
Augustovski, Federico
Briggs, Andrew H
Mauskopf, Josephine
Loder, Elizabeth
Venue: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2013
Volume: 11
Issue: 1
Pages: 6
ISSN: 1478-7547 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-11-6
PMC: PMC3607888
OpenAlex: W3044545425
Cited by: 381
References: 25
Citations by year: 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI: 18.60
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: gold
doi.org
Licence: cc-by
Locations: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
uO Research (University of Ottawa) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics: Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords: reporting guidelines, health economic evaluation, checklists, Delphi consensus, peer review, medical journal editors, ISPOR, health decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Figures

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks