Cited by 255Diabetes Management and EducationNutritional Studies and DietDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-term effects of the Mediterranean lifestyle program: a randomized clinical trial for postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Toobert, Deborah J, Glasgow, Russell E, Strycker, Lisa A, Barrera, Manuel, Ritzwoller, Debra P, Weidner, Gerdi·2007·International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple-risk-factor interventions offer a promising means for addressing the complex interactions between lifestyle behaviors, psychosocial factors, and the social environment. This report examines the long-term effects of a multiple-risk-factor intervention. METHODS: Postmenopausal women (N = 279) with type 2 diabetes participated in the Mediterranean Lifestyle Program (MLP), a randomized, comprehensive lifestyle intervention study. The intervention targeted healthful eating, physical activity, stress management, smoking cessation, and social support. Outcomes included lifestyle behaviors (i.e., dietary intake, physical activity, stress management, smoking cessation), psychosocial variables (e.g., social support, problem solving, self-efficacy, depression, quality of life), and cost analyses at baseline, and 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: MLP participants showed significant 12- and 24-month improvements in all targeted lifestyle behaviors with one exception (there were too few smokers to analyze tobacco use effects), and in psychosocial measures of use of supportive resources, problem solving, self-efficacy, and quality of life. CONCLUSION: The MLP was more effective than usual care over 24 months in producing improvements on behavioral and psychosocial outcomes. Directions for future research include replication with other populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1479-5868-4-1

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 7-Day Self-Monitoring Chart.
Figure 1 7-Day Self-Monitoring Chart.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Paulhus DL: Assessing self-deception and impression management in self-reports. The balanced inventory of Desirable Responding. Unpublished manual. 1988, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  2. Ritzwoller D, Toobert DJ, Sukhanova A, Glasgow RE: Economic analysis of the Mediterranean Lifestyle Program. Diab Educ. 2006.
  3. Collins LM, Seitz L: New methodology for substance abuse prevention research. Advances in Data Analysis for Prevention Research. Edited by: Collins LM, Seitz L. 1994, National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Toobert, D. J., Glasgow, R. E., Strycker, L. A., Barrera, M., Ritzwoller, D. P., & Weidner, G.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Research Institute (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Preventive Medicine Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Toobert, Deborah J
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Published
2007-01-17
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
1-1
ISSN
1479-5868 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1571506190
Cited by
255
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 18
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01-HL62156, R01HL062156)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, postmenopausal women, lifestyle intervention, healthy eating, physical activity, stress management, smoking cessation, social support, self-efficacy, problem solving, depression, quality of life, cost analysis, long-term outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review