The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Robustness of the inference of human population structure: a comparison of X-chromosomal and autosomal microsatellites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“an analysis of the autosomal and X-linked microsatellite markers in the HGDP-CEPH Human Genome Diversity Cell Line Panel showed no major differences between the demographic history of men and women [20].”
From Sex-Specific Genetic Structure and Social Organization in Central Asia: Insights from a Multi-Locus Study (2008) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Yet, importantly, if we apply Ramachandran et al.'s [20] model to the Central Asian data, our conclusions are left unchanged.”
From Sex-Specific Genetic Structure and Social Organization in Central Asia: Insights from a Multi-Locus Study (2008) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Therefore, we confirmed Ramachandran et al.'s [20] result that no major differences in demographic parameters between males and females are required to explain the X-chromosomal and autosomal results in this worldwide sample.”
From Sex-Specific Genetic Structure and Social Organization in Central Asia: Insights from a Multi-Locus Study (2008) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Jorde LB, Watkins WS, Bamshad MJ, et al: 'The distribution of human genetic diversity: A comparison of mitochondrial, autosomal and Y-chromosome data'. Am J Hum Genet. 2000, 66: 979-988. 10.1086/302825. · DOI
- Oota H, Settheetham-Ishida W, Tiwaweck D, et al: 'Human mtDNA and Y-chromosome variation is correlated with matrilocal versus patrilocal residence'. Nature Genet. 2001, 29: 20-21. 10.1038/ng711. · DOI · Paper page
- Seielstad MT, Minch E, Cavalli-Sforza LL: 'Genetic evidence for a higher female migration rate in humans'. Nature Genet. 1998, 20: 278-280. 10.1038/3088. · DOI · Paper page
- Cann HM, de Toma C, Cazes L, et al: 'A human genome diversity cell line panel'. Science. 2002, 296: 261-262. · DOI
- Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P: 'Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data'. Genetics. 2000, 155: 945-959. · DOI
- Rosenberg NA, Pritchard JK, Weber JL, et al: 'Genetic structure of human populations'. Science. 2002, 298: 2381-2385. 10.1126/science.1078311. · DOI · Paper page
- Zhivotovsky LA, Rosenberg NA, Feldman MW: 'Features of evolution and expansion of modern humans, inferred from genome-wide microsatellite markers'. Am J Hum Genet. 2003, 72: 1171-1186. 10.1086/375120. · DOI · Paper page
- Sabatti C, Risch N: 'Homozygosity and linkage disequilibrium'. Genetics. 2002, 160: 1707-1719. · DOI
- Weir B: Genetic Data Analysis II. 1996, Sinauer Press, Sunderland, MA
- Barbujani G, Magagni A, Minch E, et al: 'An apportionment of human DNA diversity'. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 4516-4519. 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4516. · DOI · Paper page
- Lewontin RC: 'The apportionment of human diversity'. Evol Biol. 1972, 6: 381-398. · DOI · Paper page
- Slatkin M: 'Inbreeding coefficients and coalescence times'. Genet Res. 1991, 58: 167-175. 10.1017/S0016672300029827. · DOI
- Slatkin M: 'A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies'. Genetics. 1995, 139: 457-462. · DOI
- Pérez-Lezaun A, Calafell F, Seielstad M, et al: 'Population genetics of Y-chromosome short tandem repeats in humans'. J Mol Evol. 1997, 45: 265-270. 10.1007/PL00006229. · DOI
- Ewens WJ: Population Genetics. 1969, Methuen & Co., London, UK · DOI
- Hartl DL, Clark AG: Principles of Population Genetics. 1997, Sinauer Press, Sunderland, MA
- Nordborg M, Krone S: 'Separation of time scales and convergence to the coalescent in structured populations'. Modern Developments in Theoretical Population Genetics. Edited by: Slatkin M, Veuille M. 2002, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
- Rosenberg NA, Pritchard JK, Weber JL, et al: 'Response to comment on 'Genetic structure of human populations''. Science. 2003, 300: 1877- · DOI
- Bamshad MJ, Wooding S, Watkins WS, et al: 'Human population genetic structure and inference of group membership'. Am J Hum Genet. 2003, 72: 578-589. 10.1086/368061. · DOI
- Edwards AWF: 'Human genetic diversity: Lewontin's fallacy'. Bioessays. 2003, 25: 798-801. 10.1002/bies.10315. · DOI
- Helgason A, Hrafnkelsson B, Gulcher JR, et al: 'A popula-tionwide coalescent analysis of Icelandic matrilineal and patrilineal genealogies: Evidence for a faster evolutionary rate of mtDNA lineages than Y chromosomes'. Am J Hum Genet. 2003, 72: 1370-1388. 10.1086/375453. · DOI · Paper page
- Wilson JF, Weale ME, Smith AC, et al: 'Population genetic structure of variable drug response'. Nature Genet. 2001, 29: 265-269. 10.1038/ng761. · DOI
- Disotell TR: 'Human evolution: the southern route to Asia'. Curr Biol. 1999, 9: R925-R928. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)80106-2. · DOI
- Rosenberg NA: 'Distruct: A program for the graphical display of population structure'. Mol Ecol Notes. 2004, [ http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00566.x/full ] · DOI
Cited by
Ségurel, L., Martínez-Cruz, B., Quintana-Murci, L., Balaresque, P., Georges, M., Hegay, T., Aldashev, A., Nasyrova, F., Jobling, M. A., Heyer, E., et al. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000200 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramachandran, S., Rosenberg, N. A., Zhivotovsky, L. A., & Feldman, M. W.
- Venue
- Human Genomics
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1479-7364
- PMC
- PMC3525066
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robustness of the inference of human population structure: a comparison of X-chromosomal and autosomal microsatellites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1479-7364-1-2-87
- The paper
- Ramachandran, S., Rosenberg, N. A., Zhivotovsky, L. A., & Feldman, M. W. (2004). Robustness of the inference of human population structure: a comparison of X-chromosomal and autosomal microsatellites. Human Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-7364-1-2-87
