The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of psychosocial working conditions on burnout and its core component emotional exhaustion – a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: To analyze the association between psychosocial working conditions and burnout and its core component emotional exhaustion, a systematic literature review was undertaken including cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials. METHODS: The literature search in Medline and PsycInfo was based on a defined search string and strict exclusion and inclusion criteria. Evaluation of the 5,599 initially identified search hits by two independent reviewers and a detailed quality assessment resulted in six methodologically adequate cohort studies considering the relationship between psychosocial working conditions and burnout (one study) as well as the burnout core component emotional exhaustion (five studies). RESULTS: The results of our systematic review point to a relationship between psychosocial working conditions and the development of emotional exhaustion/burnout. Particularly high job demands seem to play a role in the development of emotional exhaustion. However, strong intercorrelations between workplace factors, as a matter of principle, make the identification of a single psychosocial workplace factor (being associated with an especially high or low risk of burnout) difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Multidimensional approaches including reduction of work demands, enhancement of decision latitude and improving the social climate might be promising for preventing burnout and emotional exhaustion. However, methodologically adequate intervention studies are urgently needed to prove the effectiveness of workplace interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
![Figure 1 Flow chart of study selection procedure for systematic review of burnout and mental disorders and psychosocial working conditions (according to the PRISMA statement, Moher et al. [42]). *Note: One study reported about both burnout/emotional exhaustion and depression (duplication), the subject of this review is marked grey.](/paper-figures/9630d044c8664a69a79ef9ae8f2709f4/the-role-of-psychosocial-working-conditions-on-burnout-and-its-core-component-figure-1.jpg)
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The influence of low job control on burnout dimensions was inconsistent.”
From A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and burnout symptoms (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
The measurement of experienced burnout
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030020205 · Cited by 14,496
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397 · Cited by 12,852
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
(2013) · Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz · doi:10.1007/103.1437-1588 · Cited by 11,769
Freudenberger, H. J. (1974) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x · Cited by 5,463
The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout
Kristensen, T. S., Borritz, M., Villadsen, E., & Christensen, K. B. (2005) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678370500297720 · Cited by 3,136 · cited 1×
“lished burnout questionnaires are the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI [26]), the Oldenburg Burnout”
MethodProfessional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research
Schaufeli, W. B., Maslach, C., & Marek, T. (2017) · Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) · Cited by 1,908
Psychosocial work environment and mental health—a meta-analytic review
Stansfeld, S., & Candy, B. (2006) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.1050 · Cited by 1,875 · cited 1×
“Existing systematic reviews on the psychologic effects of psychosocial working conditions mainly focused on depression [31,32], mental disorders in all [33], and stress-related disorders [34].”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Salvagioni, D. A. J., Melanda, F. N., Mesas, A. E., González, A. D., Gabani, F. L., & Andrade, S. M. D. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185781 · Cited by 1,508
Moreno, L., Talavera‐Velasco, B., García-Albuerne, Y., & Martín‐García, J. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17155514 · Cited by 834
A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and burnout symptoms
Aronsson, G., Theorell, T., Grape, T., Hammarström, A., Hogstedt, C., Marteinsdottir, I., Skoog, I., Träskman-Bendz, L., & Hall, C. (2017) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4153-7 · Cited by 789
Ahola, K., Toppinen‐Tanner, S., & Seppänen, J. (2017) · Burnout Research · doi:10.1016/j.burn.2017.02.001 · Cited by 276
Berg-Beckhoff, G., Nielsen, G., & Ladekjær Larsen, E. (2017) · International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1080/10773525.2018.1436015 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Seidler, A., Thinschmidt, M., Deckert, S., Then, F., Hegewald, J., Nieuwenhuijsen, K., & Riedel-Heller, S. G.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- Leipzig University (DE)
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Seidler, Andreas
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10
- ISSN
- 1745-6673 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4233644
- OpenAlex
- W2118575037
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Keywords
- burnout, emotional exhaustion, psychosocial work environment, job demands, job control, social climate, burnout prevention, workplace interventions, occupational stress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
