Cited by 78Health Policy Implementation ScienceEvaluation and Performance AssessmentHealthcare Quality and Management

Methods and metrics challenges of delivery-system research

Open access
Alexander, Jeffrey A, Hearld, Larry R·2012·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many delivery-system interventions are fundamentally about change in social systems (both planned and unplanned). This systems perspective raises a number of methodological challenges for studying the effects of delivery-system change--particularly for answering questions related to whether the change will work under different conditions and how the change is integrated (or not) into the operating context of the delivery system. METHODS: The purpose of this paper is to describe the methodological and measurement challenges posed by five key issues in delivery-system research: (1) modeling intervention context; (2) measuring readiness for change; (3) assessing intervention fidelity and sustainability; (4) assessing complex, multicomponent interventions; and (5) incorporating time in delivery-system models to discuss recommendations for addressing these issues. For each issue, we provide recommendations for how research may be designed and implemented to overcome these challenges. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that a more refined understanding of the mechanisms underlying delivery-system interventions (treatment theory) and the ways in which outcomes for different classes of individuals change over time are fundamental starting points for capturing the heterogeneity in samples of individuals exposed to delivery-system interventions. To support the research recommendations outlined in this paper and to advance understanding of the "why" and "how" questions of delivery-system change and their effects, funding agencies should consider supporting studies with larger organizational sample sizes; longer duration; and nontraditional, mixed-methods designs.A version of this paper was prepared under contract with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), US Department of Health and Human Services for presentation and discussion at a meeting on "The Challenge and Promise of Delivery System Research," held in Sterling, VA, on February 16-17, 2011. The opinions in the paper are those of the author and do not represent the views or recommendations of AHRQ or the US Department of Health and Human Services.1.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1748-5908-7-15

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implementation strategies are part of 'packaged' approaches whose specific elements are poorly understood.

    “are part of ‘packaged’ approaches whose specific elements are poorly understood [12]”
  • Implementation strategies are inherently complex social interventions, as they address multifaceted and complicated processes within interpersonal, organizational, and community contexts.

    “Implementation strategies are inherently complex social interventions, as they address multifaceted and complicated processes within interpersonal, organizational, and community contexts [12,56-58].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Pawson R Tilley N Realistic Evaluation 1997 London: Sage Publications, Ltd
  2. Dumas JE Lynch AM Laughlin JE Smith EP Prinz RJ Promoting implementation fidelity: Conceptual issues, methods, and preliminary results from the Early Alliance prevention trial Am J Prev Med 2001 20 Supplement 1 38 47 11146259

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexander, J. A., & Hearld, L. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Alexander, Jeffrey A
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2012-03-12
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
15-15
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157452301
Cited by
78
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
15.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
readiness to change, intervention fidelity, sustainability, treatment theory, mixed methods research design
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Organizational Innovation, Research Design, Therapeutics, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review