Cited by 100Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealthcare Quality and ManagementHealth Sciences Research and Education

Measuring persistence of implementation: QUERI Series

Open access
the HIV/Hepatitis Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, Bowman, Candice C, Sobo, Elisa J, Asch, Steven M, Gifford, Allen L·2008·Implementation Science

Abstract

As more quality improvement programs are implemented to achieve gains in performance, the need to evaluate their lasting effects has become increasingly evident. However, such long-term follow-up evaluations are scarce in healthcare implementation science, being largely relegated to the "need for further research" section of most project write-ups. This article explores the variety of conceptualizations of implementation sustainability, as well as behavioral and organizational factors that influence the maintenance of gains. It highlights the finer points of design considerations and draws on our own experiences with measuring sustainability, framed within the rich theoretical and empirical contributions of others. In addition, recommendations are made for designing sustainability analyses. This article is one in a Series of articles documenting implementation science frameworks and approaches developed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1748-5908-3-21

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Anaya H B Results of a national comparative HIV quality-improvement initiative within the VA healthcare system. 5th International Conference on the Scientific Basis of Health Services: Global Evidence for Local Decisions 2003 Washington, D.C.
  2. Wheeler DJ Advanced Topics in Statistical Process Control 2004 2nd Ed. Knoxville, TN, SPC Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Initiative, T. H. Q. E. R., Bowman, C. C., Sobo, E. J., Asch, S. M., & Gifford, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Health Services Research & Development (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Center for the Study of Healthcare Provider Behavior (US)
  • VA New England Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Bowman, Candice C
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2008-04-22
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
21-21
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113693281
Cited by
100
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
12.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Health Services Research and Development
  • Quality Enhancement Research Initiative
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
implementation sustainability, quality improvement programs, maintenance of gains, organizational factors, behavioral factors, Department of Veterans Affairs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review