Cited by 125Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Policy Implementation SciencePsychiatric care and mental health services

Lessons from case studies of integrating mental health into primary health care in South Africa and Uganda

Open access
Petersen, Inge, Ssebunnya, Joshua, Bhana, Arvin, Baillie, Kim, MhaPP Research Programme Consortium·2011·International Journal of Mental Health Systems

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While decentralized and integrated primary mental healthcare forms the core of mental health policies in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), implementation remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to understand how the use of a common implementation framework could assist in the integration of mental health into primary healthcare in Ugandan and South African district demonstration sites. The foci and form of the services developed differed across the country sites depending on the service gaps and resources available. South Africa focused on reducing the service gap for common mental disorders and Uganda, for severe mental disorders. METHOD: A qualitative post-intervention process evaluation using focus group and individual interviews with key stakeholders was undertaken in both sites. The emergent data was analyzed using framework analysis. RESULTS: Sensitization of district management authorities and the establishment of community collaborative multi-sectoral forums assisted in improving political will to strengthen mental health services in both countries. Task shifting using community health workers emerged as a promising strategy for improving access to services and help seeking behaviour in both countries. However, in Uganda, limited application of task shifting to identification and referral, as well as limited availability of psychotropic medication and specialist mental health personnel, resulted in a referral bottleneck. To varying degrees, community-based self-help groups showed potential for empowering service users and carers to become more self sufficient and less dependent on overstretched healthcare systems. They also showed potential for promoting social inclusion and addressing stigma, discrimination and human rights abuses of people with mental disorders in both country sites. CONCLUSIONS: A common implementation framework incorporating a community collaborative multi-sectoral, task shifting and self-help approach to integrating mental health into primary healthcare holds promise for closing the treatment gap for mental disorders in LMICs at district level. However, a minimum number of mental health specialists are still required to provide supervision of non-specialists as well as specialized referral treatment services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1752-4458-5-8

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. World Health Organization (WHO) Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP): Scaling up care for mental, neurological and substance abuse disorders 2008 Geneva: WHO 26290926

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petersen, I., Ssebunnya, J., Bhana, A., Baillie, K., & MhaPP Research Programme Consortium
Affiliations
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
  • Makerere University (UG)
  • Human Sciences Research Council (ZA)
Corresponding author
Petersen, Inge
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Published
2011
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
8
ISSN
1752-4458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104844578
Cited by
125
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Wellcome Trust (50534)
  • University of Leeds
  • Department for International Development
  • Inyuvesi Yakwazulu-Natali
  • University of Ghana
  • University of Cape Town
  • Ministry of Health, Uganda
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
mental health integration, primary care, implementation framework, task shifting, community health workers, mental health treatment gap, common mental disorders, severe mental illness, stigma and discrimination, social inclusion, political will, South Africa, Uganda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review