Cited by 39Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealth Policy Implementation Science

Situational analysis to inform development of primary care and community-based mental health services for severe mental disorders in Nepal

Open access
Angdembe, Mangesh, Kohrt, Brandon A., Jordans, Mark, Rimal, Damodar, Luitel, Nagendra P.·2017·International Journal of Mental Health Systems

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nepal is representative of Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC) with limited availability of mental health services in rural areas, in which the majority of the population resides. METHODS: This formative qualitative study explores resources, challenges, and potential barriers to the development and implementation of evidence-based Comprehensive Community-based Mental Health Services (CCMHS) in accordance with the mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) for persons with severe mental health disorders and epilepsy. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs, n = 9) and Key-Informant Interviews (KIIs, n = 26) were conducted in a rural district in western Nepal. Qualitative data were coded using the Framework Analysis Method employing QSR NVIVO software. RESULTS: Health workers, general community members, and persons living with mental illness typically attributed mental illness to witchcraft, curses, and punishment for sinful acts. Persons with mental illness are often physically bound or locked in structures near their homes. Mental health services in medical settings are not available. Traditional healers are often the first treatment of choice. Primary care workers are limited both by lack of knowledge about mental illness and the inability to prescribe psychotropic medication. Health workers supported upgrading their existing knowledge and skills through mhGAP resources. Health workers lacked familiarity with basic computing and mobile technology, but they supported the introduction of mobile technology for delivering effective mental health services. Persons with mental illness and their family members supported the development of patient support groups for collective organization and advocacy. Stakeholders also supported development of focal community resource persons to aid in mental health service delivery and education. CONCLUSION: Health workers, persons living with mental illness and their families, and other stakeholders identified current gaps and barriers related to mental health services. However, respondents were generally supportive in developing community-based care in rural Nepal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13033-017-0176-9

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A qualitative study in rural Nepal found that although providers tended to have low digital literacy, they supported including mobile health technology to facilitate services.

    “A qualitative study in rural Nepal also found that although providers tended to have low digital literacy, they supported inclusion of mobile health technology to facilitate services (Angdembe et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]WHO. Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP): scaling up care for mental, neurological and substance abuse disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. 26290926
  2. [17]WHO. WHO library cataloguing-in-publication data World Health Statistics 2010. 1. Health status indicators. 2. In: World health. Vol. 3. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
  3. [25]Kessler RC Demler O Frank RG Olfson M Pincus HA Walters EE Wang P Wells KB Zaslavsky AM Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders, 1990 to 2003 N Engl J Med 2005 352 24 2515 2523 10.1056/NEJMsa043266 15958807 PMC2847367 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Angdembe, M., Kohrt, B. A., Jordans, M., Rimal, D., & Luitel, N. P.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Angdembe, Mangesh
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Published
2017-11-15
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
69-69
ISSN
1752-4458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768217634
Cited by
39
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Grand Challenges Canada (GMH_0091-04)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
severe mental illness, community mental health services, primary care, Mental Health Gap Action Programme, rural mental health, mental health stigma, traditional healers, psychotropic prescribing, patient support groups, epilepsy, Nepal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review