Cited by 139Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disturbed functional brain networks and neurocognitive function in low-grade glioma patients: a graph theoretical analysis of resting-state MEG

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To understand neurophysiological mechanisms underlying cognitive dysfunction in low-grade glioma (LGG) patients by evaluating the spatial structure of 'resting-state' brain networks with graph theory. METHODS: Standardized tests measuring 6 neurocognitive domains were administered in 17 LGG patients and 17 healthy controls. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings were conducted during eyes-closed 'resting state'. The phase lag index (PLI) was computed in seven frequency bands to assess functional connectivity between brain areas. Spatial patterns were characterized with graph theoretical measures such as clustering coefficient (local connectivity), path length (global integration), network small world-ness (ratio of clustering coefficient/path length) and degree correlation (the extent to which connected nodes have similar degrees). RESULTS: Compared to healthy controls, patients performed poorer on psychomotor functioning, attention, information processing, and working memory. Patients displayed higher short- and long-distance synchronization and clustering coefficient in the theta band, whereas a lower clustering coefficient and small world-ness were observed in the beta band. A lower degree correlation was found in the upper gamma band. LGG patients with higher clustering coefficient, longer path length, and lower degree correlations in delta and lower alpha band were characterized by poorer neurocognitive performance. CONCLUSION: LGG patients display higher short- and long-distance synchronization within the theta band. Network analysis revealed changes (in particularly the theta, beta, and upper gamma band) suggesting disturbed network architecture. Moreover, correlations between network characteristics and neurocognitive performance were found, Widespread changes in the strength and spatial organization of brain networks may be responsible for cognitive dysfunction in glioma patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1753-4631-3-9

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 A graphic representation of the differences in connectivity between the 17 LGG patients and the healthy control group for each frequency band.
Figure 1 A graphic representation of the differences in connectivity between the 17 LGG patients and the healthy control group for each frequency band.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Significant differences in the clustering coefficient in the theta and beta band between LGG patients and healthy controls.
Figure 2 Significant differences in the clustering coefficient in the theta and beta band between LGG patients and healthy controls.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Luteijn F, Ploeg van der FAE: Groningen Intelligence Test. revised manual Lisse Swets and Zeitlinger. 1983

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 139

Metadata

Authors
Bosma, I., Reijneveld, J. C., Klein, M., Douw, L., van Dijk, B. W., Heimans, J. J., & Stam, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Bosma, Ingeborg
Venue
Nonlinear Biomedical Physics
Published
2009-08-23
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
9-9
ISSN
1753-4631 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162546175
Cited by
139
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nonlinear Biomedical Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
low-grade glioma, resting-state brain networks, functional connectivity, graph theory, cognitive impairment, neuropsychological performance, phase lag index, beta band, gamma band, small-world networks, clustering coefficient, path length, degree correlation, working memory, attention, psychomotor performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review