Cited by 11Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentVector-borne infectious diseasesVector-Borne Animal Diseases

Transmission risk of Dirofilariosis in Portugal

Open access
Alho, AM, Nunes, T, Rinaldi, L, Meireles, J, Belo, S, Deplazes, P, Madeira de Carvalho, L·2014·Parasites & Vectors

Abstract

Dirofilariosis is an important and potential fatal vector-borne canine disease, endemic in Portugal as well as in other Mediterranean countries, particularly due to its geographic and climatic conditions. Despite improved diagnostic methods and effective preventives, infections of Dirofilaria spp. continue to increase. Forty-one species of mosquitoes have been detected in mainland Portugal although only Culex theileri was found naturally infected with Dirofilaria larvae. Therefore, a study was addressed to assess Dirofilaria transmission risk in Portugal based on air temperatures, estimating the potential days with temperature values compatible with the transmission of Dirofilaria larvae between mosquito and reservoirs. A degree-days model based on Dirofilaria Development Units (DDUs) was used, considering minimum and maximum daily temperatures registered in five Portuguese meteorological stations, obtained in the platform wunderground.com. Preconditions for the model were: a threshold temperature of 14°C below which Dirofilaria development will not proceed in mosquitoes; 130 cumulative DDUs for larvae to reach infectivity; and a maximum life expectancy of 30 days for mosquito vectors. DDU was evaluated in three areas of Portugal mainland - Porto (North, 41°9'0N/8°37'0W), Lisbon (Centre, 38°43'0N/9°8'0W) and Faro (South, 37°1'0N/7°56'0W), as well as in two different Portuguese islands in the Atlantic Ocean - Sao Miguel, Azores (37°44'0N/25°40'0W) and Madeira (32°38' 0N/16°54'0W), over the period from 2003 to 2013. The results show that the highest number of potential days with suitable conditions for Dirofilaria transmission was registered in Madeira with an average of 209.9 days/year, followed by Faro 175.2 days/year, Lisbon 163.5 days/year, Azores 140 days/year and Porto 117.2 days/year. The year 2006 was the one with a maximum number of potential transmission days (179.8) across the selected stations. During the last decade, 130 DDUs were inclusively registered from June to November in Porto and Azores Island, from April to November in Lisbon and Faro, and an uncommonly extended period from April to January in Madeira Island. An average Dirofilaria seasonal risk period ranged from a minimum of 5 months/year in Porto, 5.6 months/year in Azores, 6.4 months/year in Lisboa, 6.9 months/year in Faro and 8 months/year in Madeira. These results are in accordance with the existing prevalence data and reinforce the value of geospatial tools, mapping the risk and helping to monitor and forecast future epidemiological trends, ensuring a continued surveillance and a One Medicine-One Health integrated approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1756-3305-7-s1-o16

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alho, A., Nunes, T., Rinaldi, L., Meireles, J., Belo, S., Deplazes, P., & Madeira de Carvalho, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Alho, AM
Venue
Parasites & Vectors
Published
2014
Volume
7
Issue
Suppl 1
Pages
O16
ISSN
1756-3305 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054163248
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Parasites & Vectors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/85427/2012)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Vector-Borne Animal Diseases
Keywords
canine dirofilariasis, Dirofilaria, mosquito-borne transmission, Culex theileri, transmission risk, Portugal, Madeira, Azores, Porto, Lisbon, Faro, climate and disease transmission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review