Dirofilaria immitis infection in the Pelagie archipelago: The southernmost hyperendemic focus in Europe
Open accessAbstract
Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens are mosquito-borne filarioids of zoonotic concern, which primarily cause canine heartworm disease (HWD) and subcutaneous dirofilariosis, respectively. The geographical distribution of these nematodes is constantly changing, due to many factors such as the colonization by new invasive mosquito species, the increased movement of animals and the absence of chemoprophylactic strategies in non-endemic regions. Although HWD has always been considered endemic in northern Italy, an increase in the prevalence of this disease has been recorded in the last decades in central and southern regions. We describe the southernmost hyperendemic European focus of heartworm disease in the Pelagie archipelagos. From June to November 2020, 157 dogs and 46 cats were sampled in Linosa and Lampedusa islands for the detection of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens by modified Knott's, rapid antigen and molecular tests. Mosquitoes were collected using CDC light and BG sentinel-2 traps and aspirators, and tested for host blood meal and Dirofilaria spp. DNA. Out of 56 dogs in Linosa and 101 in Lampedusa, 33 (i.e. 58.9%) and 8 (i.e. 7.9%) were positive to D. immitis and D. repens, respectively. Three cats scored positive to D. immitis (i.e. 17.6%) in Linosa. Six mosquito species were identified, and the abdomen of a non-engorged Aedes albopictus was positive for D. immitis and human DNA. The results suggest that D. immitis infection could spread to new previously non-endemic territories in southern Europe, representing a real threat to animal and human health.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study reports the southernmost European hyperendemic focus of canine heartworm disease on Linosa, Pelagie archipelago, with 58.9% of sampled dogs positive for *Dirofilaria immitis*. It also detected *D. immitis* DNA in a non-engorged *Aedes albopictus* mosquito that had fed on human blood, suggesting risk for animal and human health in southern Europe.
Key findings
- Among 56 dogs in Linosa, 33 (58.9%, 95% CI 0.46–0.72) were positive for *D. immitis* by at least one diagnostic method; modified Knott’s detected 25 (44.6%) and SNAP 4Dx Plus detected 32 (57.1%). In Lampedusa, 8 of 101 dogs (7.9%, 95% CI 0.04–0.15) were positive for *D. repens* only.
- Of 17 cats in Linosa, 3 (17.6%, 95% CI 0.05–0.42) were positive for *D. immitis* by qPCR; all cats in Lampedusa scored negative.
- Mosquito sampling yielded 262 specimens belonging to six species; of 155 females, one non-engorged *Ae. albopictus* abdomen (0.6%) was positive for *D. immitis* DNA and human DNA. New mosquito species recorded for Linosa included *Culiseta annulata*, *Culex pipiens*, and *Aedes caspius*.
- Dog prevalence did not differ by sex (males 61.8%, females 54.5%; OR = 1.35, p = 0.591); infected dogs were more than one year old (Linosa mean 6.6 years, SD = 3.31; Lampedusa mean 6.4 years, SD = 4.02), with more positives in older dogs but not statistically different (p = 0.0514).
Methods
- Cross-sectional epidemiological survey conducted in Linosa and Lampedusa from June/July to November 2020; 157 dogs and 46 cats were sampled (56 dogs and 17 cats in Linosa; 101 dogs and 29 cats in Lampedusa). Blood was tested by modified Knott’s test, SNAP 4Dx Plus (dogs only), and duplex real-time PCR for *Dirofilaria* spp.
- Mosquitoes were collected using CDC light traps, BG sentinel-2 traps, and aspirators; specimens were morphologically identified, females dissected into head+thorax and abdomen, and tested by qPCR for *D. immitis* and *D. repens*. A subset of engorged specimens (n = 9) was tested by cytochrome b cPCR and sequencing for blood-meal identification.
- Data were analysed with Quantitative Parasitology 3.0; odds ratios were calculated at 95% CI, with p < 0.05 considered significant.
Limitations
- The paper states that the low number of cats examined at Site A prevents a definitive conclusion, and that low circulating microfilariae may explain negative Knott’s results in cats and antigen-positive/Knott-negative dogs.
- The paper states that few mosquito specimens were collected (n = 196) due to difficulties in dry ice supply and windy conditions, limiting conclusions; it also notes that the vectorial competence of the abundant *Ae. mariae* complex is unknown and requires further analyses.
- Evident from the text: the study is cross-sectional with no previous Linosa data, diagnostic methods differed by host (SNAP only for dogs; Knott’s not performed for 18 Lampedusa cats), and the discussion’s mosquito count (n = 196) conflicts with Table 2’s total (n = 262).
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 28 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Blood meals from humans, goats, sheep and rats were detected by sequencing in collected mosquitoes.
“Blood from humans (n = 1, Aedes mariae complex; n = 1, Ae. albopictus), goat (n = 3, Ae.mariae complex; n = 1, Cx. pipiens), sheep (n = 1, Ae. mariae complex) and rats (n = 1, Ae. mariae complex; n = 1, Ae. albopictus) were detected by sequencing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In Linosa, 3 of 17 cats (17.6%, 95% CI 0.05-0.42) were positive for D. immitis by qPCR.
“Finally, of 17 cats at Site A, 3 (i.e.17.6%; 95% CI: 0.05-0.42)were positive for D. immitis by qPCR”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The abdomen of one non-engorged Ae. albopictus mosquito (0.6%) scored positive for D. immitis DNA.
“The abdomen of one specimen of a non-engorged Ae. albopictus mosquito (i.e.0.6%) scored positive for D. immitis DNA as well as for human DNA (100% nucleotide identity with Homo sapiens sequence, accession number, MK936800).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Prevalence of D. immitis infection did not differ according to sex in dogs (males 61.8%, females 54.5%; OR=1.35, χ2=0.29; p=0.591).
“Prevalence of infection did not differ according to sex (i.e.males n = 21; 61.8% and females n = 22; 54.5%; OR = 1.35, χ2 = 0.29; p = 0.591).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The same non-engorged Ae. albopictus mosquito scored positive for human DNA with 100% nucleotide identity with Homo sapiens sequence (accession MK936800).
“The abdomen of one specimen of a non-engorged Ae. albopictus mosquito (i.e.0.6%) scored positive for D. immitis DNA as well as for human DNA (100% nucleotide identity with Homo sapiens sequence, accession number, MK936800).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingcitation
This study updates knowledge about the mosquito species composition, adding Culiseta annulata, Cx. pipiens and Aedes caspius to the list of those previously recorded in Linosa.
“On the other hand, this study updates knowledge about the mosquito species composition, adding more species (i.e.Culiseta annulata, Cx. pipiens and Aedes caspius) to the list of those previously recorded in Linosa (Luca et al., 2017;Toma et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Luca et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Toma et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
The most abundant mosquito species collected belong to Ae. mariae complex, as previously reported in an entomological survey conducted on the island.
“The most abundant mosquito species collected belong to Ae. mariae complex, as previously reported in an entomological survey conducted on the island (Toma et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Toma et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
An increasing number of autochthonous HWD cases have been reported in central and southern regions of Italy in the last two decades.
“though an increasing number of autochthonous cases have been reported in central and southern regions of Italy in the last two decades (Mendoza-Roldan et al., 2020;Otranto et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mendoza-Roldan et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Otranto et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The complete absence of HWD cases in Lampedusa is indicative of the likely recent introduction of D. immitis infection at Linosa.
“The results are even more interesting if one considers the complete absence of HWD cases in Lampedusa (an island 40 km away), which is indicative of the limited movement of infected animals between the two islands as well as of the likely recent introduction of the infection at Site A.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Owners' reports of no travel history for sampled animals are accurate.
- Interpretationown data
The presence of human DNA in the D. immitis-positive specimen of Ae. albopictus confirms the role of Ae. albopictus in transmission of D. immitis among animals and humans.
“The presence of human DNA in D. immitis-positive specimen of Ae. albopictus confirms the role of this mosquito species in the transmission of this filarioid among animals and humans, thus representing a potential risk for people living on the island.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The D. immitis DNA detected in the abdomen of a non-engorged Ae. albopictus indicates that the mosquito was infected with D. immitis.
- Interpretationcitation
The percentage of animals positive for D. immitis in Linosa (small island 5.4 sq Km) is similar to that recorded in another hyperendemic spot (58.1%) in a dog shelter from Apulia region in southern Italy.
“The percentage of animals positive for D. immitis in such a small island (5.4 sq Km) is similar to that recorded in another hyperendemic spot (58.1%) in a dog shelter from Apulia region in southern Italy (Panarese, Iatta, Mendoza-Roldan, et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Panarese, Iatta, Mendoza-Roldan, et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The presence of human DNA in the D. immitis-positive specimen of Ae. albopictus represents a potential risk for people living on Linosa.
“The presence of human DNA in D. immitis-positive specimen of Ae. albopictus confirms the role of this mosquito species in the transmission of this filarioid among animals and humans, thus representing a potential risk for people living on the island.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The D. immitis DNA detected in the abdomen of a non-engorged Ae. albopictus indicates that the mosquito was infected with D. immitis.
- Interpretationown data
The occurrence of D. immitis in the mosquito population of Linosa island is the southernmost report of HWD in Italy.
“The occurrence of D. immitis in the mosquito population of Linosa island is the southernmost report of HWD in Italy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The D. immitis DNA detected in the abdomen of a non-engorged Ae. albopictus indicates that the mosquito was infected with D. immitis.
- Premisecitation
Aedes albopictus is a well-known vector of D. immitis.
“Indeed, the DNA of D. immitis was detected in one specimen of Ae. albopictus, which is a well-known vector of this filarial species (Otranto et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Otranto et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The complete absence of HWD cases in Lampedusa is indicative of limited movement of infected animals between Lampedusa and Linosa.
“The results are even more interesting if one considers the complete absence of HWD cases in Lampedusa (an island 40 km away), which is indicative of the limited movement of infected animals between the two islands as well as of the likely recent introduction of the infection at Site A.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Owners' reports of no travel history for sampled animals are accurate.
- May combine two claims. 18
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 17
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe qPCR confirmed the presence of D. immitis at Site A and D. repens at Site B.
“The qPCR confirmed the presence of D. immitis at Site A and D. repens at Site B.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe mosquitoes collected during the whole sampling period (n=262) belonged to six species.
“The mosquitoes collected during the whole sampling period (n = 262) belonged to six species (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThere was a higher number of positive samples in the oldest dogs, although not statistically different (p=0.0514).
“with a higher number of positive samples in the oldest dogs given the number of seasons of exposure to mosquitoes, although not statistically different (p = 0.0514).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOf the female mosquitoes collected (n=155), 43 were engorged.
“Of the females collected (n = 155), 43 were engorged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn Lampedusa, 8 of 101 dogs (7.9%, 95% CI 0.04-0.15) tested positive for D. repens by Knott and molecular tests.
“whereas from Site B, 8 (i.e.7.9%, 95% CI: 0.04-0.15)were positive only for D. repens to Knott and molecular tests”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAt both sites, infected dogs were more than one year old (Site A mean 6.6 years, SD=3.31; Site B mean 6.4 years, SD=4.02).
“At both sites, infected dogs were more than one year old (i.e.Site A: mean 6.6 years; SD=3.31;Site B: mean 6.4 years; SD = 4.02)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn Linosa, 33 of 56 dogs (58.9%, 95% CI 0.46-0.72) tested positive for D. immitis at least by one diagnostic method.
“Of the 56 dogs from Site A, 33 (i.e.58.9%, 95% CI: 0.46-0.72)tested positive for D. immitis at least by one diagnostic method”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn Site A, all dogs positive to Knott's test were also positive to the HW antigen test, except for a single dog, resulting in a concordance between the tests of 84% (95% CI 0.72-0.92).
“In Site A, all dogs positive to Knott's test were also positive to the HW antigen test, except for a single dog, resulting in a concordance between the tests of 84% (95% CI: 0.72-0.92).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataIn Lampedusa, all sampled cats scored negative for D. immitis.
“while at Site B, all scored negative.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe epidemiology of Dirofilaria infection is strictly linked with the presence of the above mosquito species and animal reservoirs, as shown in Sicily where the majority of human cases in Trapani overlapped with high prevalence of SCD in dogs.
“Therefore, the epidemiology of the infection is strictly linked with the presence of the above mosquito species and animal reservoirs as clearly shown in Sicily, where the majority of human cases in the province of Trapani overlapped with the high prevalence of SCD in dogs (Otranto et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Otranto et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMore than 70 mosquito species (genera Aedes/Ochlerotatus, Anopheles and Culex) are putative or competent vectors of Dirofilaria spp.
“Although more than 70 mosquito species (i.e.genera Aedes/Ochlerotatus, Anopheles and Culex) are putative or competent vectors of Dirofilaria spp.(Eldridge & Edman, 2000)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Eldridge & Edman, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens are mosquito-borne filarioids with a worldwide distribution in tropical and temperate regions.
“Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens (Spirurida, Onchocercidae), the causative agents of canine heartworm disease (HWD) and subcutaneous dirofilariosis (SCD), respectively, are mosquito-borne filarioids with a worldwide distribution in tropical and temperate regions (Dantas-Torres & Otranto, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dantas-Torres & Otranto, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDogs are the principal source of human infections with Dirofilaria, which are usually caused by D. repens in Europe and D. immitis in the Americas.
“Dogs are the principal source of human infections which are usually caused by D. repens in Europe and D. immitis in the Americas (Dantas-Torres & Otranto, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dantas-Torres & Otranto, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCulex pipiens and Aedes albopictus are mainly implicated in the transmission of Dirofilaria infection.
“Culex pipiens and Aedes albopictus are mainly implicated in the transmission of the infection (Otranto et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Otranto et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataDue to the low number of cats examined at Site A, a definitive conclusion cannot be inferred.
“However, due to the low number of cats examined at Site A, a definitive conclusion cannot be inferred.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBoth Linosa and Lampedusa are, at different scale, closed environments with peculiar epidemiological favourable conditions for D. immitis infection with such a high prevalence.
“Both sites are, at different scale, closed environments with peculiar epidemiological favourable conditions for D. immitis infection with such a high prevalence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWith a prevalence of almost 59% of dogs positive for D. immitis, Linosa is the southernmost hyperendemic focus for HWD infection.
“With a prevalence of almost 59% of dogs positive for D. immitis, Linosa is the southernmost hyperendemic focus for HWD infection”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Owners' reports of no travel history for sampled animals are accurate.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataData herein presented shows an increase in canine HW cases in previously non-endemic areas of the southern Mediterranean region, where veterinarians, physicians and pet owners are not aware of this parasitosis.
“Data, herein presented, shows an increase in canine HW cases in previously non-endemic areas of the southern Mediterranean region, where veterinarians, physicians and pet owners are not aware of this parasitosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA hyperendemic focus of D. immitis infection was described in sheltered dogs from Apulia region (southern Italy) with an overall prevalence of infection of 44.2% at Knott's test, and up to 58.1% using the SNAP 4Dx Plus test.
“Recently, a hyperendemic focus of D. immitis infection was described in sheltered dogs from Apulia region (southern Italy) with an overall prevalence of infection of 44.2% at Knott's test, and up to 58.1% using the SNAP 4Dx Plus test (Panarese, Iatta, Latrofa, et al., 2020;Panarese, Iatta, Mendoza-Roldan, et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Panarese, Iatta, Latrofa, et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Panarese, Iatta, Mendoza-Roldan, et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSome antigenic-positive dogs scored negative to the Knott's test could be explained by the low number of circulating microfilariae because of old adult nematodes or for a natural immunity developed by dogs exposed to continuous infections.
“In the same way, the fact that some of the antigenic-positive dogs scored negative to the Knott's test could be explained by the low number of circulating microfilariae because of old adult nematodes (Borthakur et al., 2016) or for a natural immunity developed by dogs exposed to continuous infections (Stogdale, 1984).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Borthakur et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Stogdale, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe colonization by new invasive mosquito species, increased movement of animals across Italy, and lack of chemoprophylactic strategies in non-endemic regions have been proposed as the main drivers for the changing pattern of HWD.
“The colonization by new invasive species of mosquitoes [i.e.Aedes albopictus (Stegomyia albopicta)], the increased movement of animals across the Country and the lack of adoption of chemoprophylactic strategies in non-endemic regions have been proposed as the main drivers for this changing pattern (Mendoza-Roldan et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mendoza-Roldan et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe absence of feline Dirofilaria spp. infection detected by modified Knott's method may be explained by the low number of circulating microfilariae.
“The absence of feline Dirofilaria spp.infection detected by modified Knott's method may be explained by the low number of circulating mfs (Panarese, et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Panarese, et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe prevalence of D. immitis in mosquitoes in Linosa (0.6%) is slightly higher than that reported in northern Italy (0.057%) and lower than that in a shelter in Apulia region (2.2%).
“This prevalence (0.6%) is slightly higher than that reported in northern Italy (0.057%; Latrofa et al., 2020), and lower than that in a shelter in Apulia region (2.2%;Panarese, Iatta, Latrofa, et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Latrofa et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Panarese, Iatta, Latrofa, et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe number of positive dogs obtained with the antigenic test was higher than that detected by modified Knott's test, due to the presence of amicrofilaraemic animals.
“The number of positive dogs obtained with the antigenic test was higher than that detected by modified Knott's test, due to the presence of amicrofilaraemic animals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe prevalence of D. repens in Lampedusa (7.9%) is similar to that reported in other studies (1.5%-12%) but slightly lower than that of eastern European regions (7%-20%).
“with a prevalence of infection similar to that reported in other studies (i.e.1.5%-12%; Capelli et al., 2018; 7%, Panarese, Iatta, Latrofa, et al., 2020), but slightly lower than that of eastern European regions (i.e.7%-20%; Genchi & Kramer, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Capelli et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Panarese, Iatta, Latrofa, et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Genchi & Kramer, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHistorically, HWD was considered endemic in northern Italy, in the Po river valley.
“Historically, HWD was considered endemic in northern Italy, in the Po river valley (Capelli et al., 1996)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Capelli et al., 1996
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe higher number of positive samples in oldest dogs is attributable to the number of seasons of exposure to mosquitoes.
“with a higher number of positive samples in the oldest dogs given the number of seasons of exposure to mosquitoes, although not statistically different (p = 0.0514).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThese data are not definitive due to the few numbers of specimens collected (n=196) also due to the difficulties in dry ice supply and the windy conditions.
“Again, these data are not definitive due to the few numbers of specimens collected (n = 196) also due to the difficulties in dry ice supply and the windy conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll sampled animals were kept on the islands the year before due to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, and no history of travel was reported by the owners, except for 5 dogs from Linosa that were brought to Lampedusa for hunting activities or veterinary cares.
“All the sampled animals were kept on the islands the year before due to the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, and no history of travel was reported by the owners, except for 5 dogs from Linosa that were brought to Lampedusa (i.e.27 miles away) for hunting activities or veterinary cares.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Owners' reports of no travel history for sampled animals are accurate.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationAll mosquito specimens were identified using morphological keys.
“All the specimens were identified using morphological keys (Becker et al., 2010;Severini et al., 2009)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Becker et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Severini et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll DNA samples were tested in duplicate, and positive and negative controls were included in each qPCR run.
“All DNA samples were tested in duplicate, and positive and negative controls were included in each qPCR run.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDespite no previous data available for Linosa Island, the evidence that D. immitis was not endemic in Sicilian territories can be inferred by the results of a large epidemiological study (n=2,512 dogs examined) in which from 0.2% to 1.4% D. immitis prevalence was diagnosed in dogs with a history of travelling.
“Despite no previous data are available for Linosa Island, the evidence that D. immitis was not endemic in Sicilian territories can be inferred by the results of a large epidemiological study (n = 2,512 dogs examined) in which from 0.2% to 1.4% D. immitis prevalence was diagnosed in dogs with a history of travelling (Giannetto et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giannetto et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe specificity of the qPCR assay was established by melting curve analysis as described in Latrofa et al. (2012).
“The specificity of the qPCR assay was established by melting curve analysis as described in Latrofa et al. (2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Latrofa et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Owners' reports of no travel history for sampled animals are accurate.
“no history of travel was reported by the owners, except for 5 dogs from Linosa that were brought to Lampedusa”
The paper relies on this without support.
The D. immitis DNA detected in the abdomen of a non-engorged Ae. albopictus indicates that the mosquito was infected with D. immitis.
“The abdomen of one specimen of a non-engorged Ae. albopictus mosquito (i.e.0.6%) scored positive for D. immitis DNA as well as for human DNA”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Giglio and Sardinia, canine heartworm prevalence was 2.4% and 8.9%, respectively, and on Linosa and Lampedusa islands D. immitis was detected at 58.9%.
“Finally, the prevalence in Giglio and Sardinia were 2.4 and 8.9%, respectively [29,39]. In addition, on the Linosa and Lampedusa islands, D. immitis was detected at 58.9% [40].”
From What has happened to heartworm disease in Europe in the last 10 years? (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
In Italy, feline heartworm studies are still scarce, and in the last decade studies showed a prevalence of 17.6% in Linosa.
“In Italy, studies are still scarce. If previously, prevalence in cats was heterogeneous being 6.06–27% in the north and centre of the country, in addition to reports of isolated cases [4,9,123,124], in the last decade, studies in cats showed a prevalence of 17.6% in Linosa (an island halfway between the island of Sicily and the African coast of Tunisia) [40].”
From What has happened to heartworm disease in Europe in the last 10 years? (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
In Italy, culicid vectors of Dirofilaria have been demonstrated in different regions, including Cx. pipiens in north-eastern Italy, Ae. albopictus, Cq. richiardii, Cs. annulate, Cx. pipiens, and Och. caspius in southern Italy, and Ae. albopictus in Pelagie Archipelago.
“In Italy, several studies have continued to demonstrate the existence of culicid vectors of Dirofilaria in different regions of the country, such as Cx. pipiens in north-eastern Italy [150], Ae. albopictus, Cq. richiardii, Cs. annulate, Cx. pipiens, and Och. caspius in southern Italy [34,151], and Ae. albopictus in Pelagie Archipelago [40].”
From What has happened to heartworm disease in Europe in the last 10 years? (2022) · cites this paper as [40]
Aedes albopictus was found to be highly infested with D. immitis (MIR = 3%, EIR = 3.8%).
“Aedes albopictus was found to be highly infested with D. immitis (MIR = 3%, EIR = 3.8%), as shown previously [6, 15, 51].”
From Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in mosquitoes from Corsica Island, France (2021) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Site B confidence interval has a conflicting lower bound
MinorTable 1 prints the lower bound as 0.39, which also exceeds its upper bound of 0.15. The results give the lower bound as 0.04.
“Site B (N = 101) 8 b (7.9) 0.39-0.15”
“8 (i.e.7.9%, 95% CI: 0.04-0.15)were positive only for D. repens”
Reported percentage of female mosquitoes is incorrect
MinorUsing the table's reported totals, 155 of 262 mosquitoes is 59.2%, not 56.6%.
Reported 56.6 · recomputed 59.160305
“Total (n = 262) 155 (56.6%) -1 (0.6%) +”
Female mosquito counts do not sum to the reported total
MinorThe female counts across the eight categories in Table 2 sum to 145, not 155.
Reported 155 · recomputed 145
“Total (n = 262) 155 (56.6%) -1 (0.6%) +”
Lampedusa dog sampling percentage excludes stray dogs
MinorThe stated 15.8% is 101 out of 641 owned dogs, but the paper calls it a percentage of the whole dog population, which it says also includes 297 stray dogs.
“101 dogs and 29 cats in Lampedusa (i.e.15.8% and 6.3% of the”
“in Lampedusa, the population of dogs and cats consisted of 641 owned dogs, 297 stray dogs and 460 cats”
Cites
Chomczyński, P. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 2,788 · see citing works
Becker, N., Petric, D., Zgomba, M., Boase, C., Madon, M., Dahl, C., & Kaiser, A. (2010) · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-92874-4 · Cited by 1,403 · see citing works
QUANTIFYING PARASITES IN SAMPLES OF HOSTS
Rózsa, L., Reiczigel, J., & Majoros, G. (2000) · Journal of Parasitology · doi:10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0228:qpisoh]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,228 · see citing works
Rickettsial Infection in Animals and Brazilian Spotted Fever Endemicity
Sangioni, L. A., Horta, M. C., Vianna, M. C. B., Gennari, S. M., Soares, R. M., Galvão, M. A. M., Schumaker, T. T. S., Ferreira, F., Vidotto, O., & Labruna, M. B. (2005) · Emerging infectious diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1102.040656 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
Climate and Dirofilaria infection in Europe
Genchi, C., Rinaldi, L., Mortarino, M., Genchi, M., & Cringoli, G. (2009) · Veterinary parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.03.026 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Vector-borne helminths of dogs and humans in Europe
Otranto, D., Dantas-Torres, F., Brianti, E., Traversa, D., Petrić, D., Genchi, C., & Capelli, G. (2013) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-6-16 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Self-citationRecent advances on Dirofilaria repens in dogs and humans in Europe
Capelli, G., Genchi, C., Baneth, G., Bourdeau, P., Brianti, E., Cardoso, L., Danesi, P., Fuehrer, H.-P., Giannelli, A., Ionică, A. M., et al. (2018) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-018-3205-x · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Self-citationIs heartworm disease really spreading in Europe?
Genchi, C., Rinaldi, L., Cascone, C., Mortarino, M., & Cringoli, G. (2005) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.04.009 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Otranto, D., Capelli, G., & Genchi, C. (2009) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-2-s1-s2 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Self-citationDirofilariosis in the Americas: a more virulent Dirofilaria immitis?
Dantas‐Torres, F., & Otranto, D. (2013) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-6-288 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Self-citationSubcutaneous dirofilariosis (Dirofilaria repens): an infection spreading throughout the old world
Genchi, C., & Kramer, L. (2017) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-017-2434-8 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Mendoza-Roldan, J., Benelli, G., Panarese, R., Iatta, R., Furlanello, T., Beugnet, F., Zatelli, A., & Otranto, D. (2020) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-020-04063-9 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationLE ZANZARE ITALIANE: GENERALITÀ E IDENTIFICAZIONE DEGLI ADULTI (DIPTERA, CULICIDAE)
Severini, F., Toma, L., Luca, M. D., & Romi, R. (2009) · Fragmenta Entomologica · doi:10.4081/fe.2009.92 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Comparison of Diagnostic Tools for the Detection of Dirofilaria immitis Infection in Dogs
Panarese, R., Iatta, R., Mendoza‐Roldan, J. A., Szlosek, D. A., Braff, J. C., Liu, J., Beugnet, F., Dantas‐Torres, F., Beall, M. J., & Otranto, D. (2020) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens9060499 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationOverview on Dirofilaria immitis in the Americas, with notes on other filarial worms infecting dogs
Dantas‐Torres, F., & Otranto, D. (2020) · Veterinary Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109113 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationGonzález, E., Jiménez, M., Hernández, S., Martín-Martín, I., & Molina, R. (2017) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-017-2309-z · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Latrofa, M. S., Montarsi, F., Ciocchetta, S., Annoscia, G., Dantas-Torres, F., Ravagnan, S., Capelli, G., & Otranto, D. (2012) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-5-76 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationOtranto, D., Brianti, E., Gaglio, G., Dantas‐Torres, F., Azzaro, S., & Giannetto, S. (2011) · American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0719 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationPanarese, R., Iatta, R., Latrofa, M. S., Zatelli, A., Ignjatović Ćupina, A., Montarsi, F., Pombi, M., Mendoza-Roldan, J. A., Beugnet, F., & Otranto, D. (2020) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2020.04.002 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationDirofilarioses in two cats in southern Italy
Panarese, R., Iatta, R., Lia, R. P., Passantino, G., Ciccarelli, S., Gernone, F., Zatelli, A., & Otranto, D. (2021) · Parasitology Research · doi:10.1007/s00436-021-07127-6 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationLuca, M. D., Toma, L., Severini, F., et al. (2017) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-017-2488-7 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
A CHECKLIST OF THE MAMMALS OF SMALL ITALIAN ISLANDS
Angelici, F. M., Laurenti, A., Nappi, A., et al. (2009) · Bollettino del CILEA (CILEA) · doi:10.4404/hystrix-20.1-4429 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The host-parasite relationship in canine heartworm infection in a hyperendemic area of italy
Capelli, G., Poglayen, G., Bertotti, F., Giupponi, S., & Martini, M. (1996) · Veterinary Research Communications · doi:10.1007/bf00366538 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Ozella, L., Cecchetti, M., & Pessani, D. (2016) · The European Zoological Journal · doi:10.1080/11250003.2016.1237562 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Occult Dirofilariosis in Dogs of North Eastern Region in India.
Borthakur, S. K., Deka, D. K., Islam, S., & Sarmah, P. C. (2016) · PubMed Central · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Toma, L., Severini, F., Romi, R., et al. (2020) · Journal of Entomological and Acarological Research · doi:10.4081/jear.2020.8968 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Testing for occult heartworm infection.
Stogdale, L. (1984) · PubMed · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Introduction to Medical Entomology
Eldridge, B. F., & Edman, J. D. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-6472-6_1 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- European Society of Dirofilariosis and Angiostrongylosis (ESDA), Guidelines for clinical management of feline heartworm disease
- Giannetto S., 2007, Abstract book of the 1st European Dirofilaria days
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What has happened to heartworm disease in Europe in the last 10 years?
Morchón, R., Montoya-Alonso, J. A., Rodríguez-Escolar, I., & Carretón, E. (2022) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens11091042 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in mosquitoes from Corsica Island, France
Younes, L., Barré-Cardi, H., Bedjaoui, S., Ayhan, N., Varloud, M., Mediannikov, O., Otranto, D., & Davoust, B. (2021) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-021-04931-y · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationDirofilaria spp. infection in cats from the Mediterranean basin: diagnosis and epidemiology
Carbonara, M., Perles, L., Venco, L., Gabrielli, S., Barrs, V. R., Miró, G., Papadopoulos, E., Lima, C., Bouhsira, E., Baneth, G., et al. (2025) · International Journal for Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2025.01.011 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationSimultaneous Exposure to Angiostrongylus vasorum and Vector-Borne Pathogens in Dogs from Italy
Morelli, S., Gori, F., Colombo, M., Traversa, D., Sarrocco, G., Simonato, G., Nespeca, C., Di Cesare, A., Frangipane di Regalbono, A., Veronesi, F., et al. (2021) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens10091200 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brianti, E., Panarese, R., Napoli, E., De Benedetto, G., Gaglio, G., Bezerra‐Santos, M. A., Mendoza‐Roldan, J. A., & Otranto, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Messina (IT)
- University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
- Department of Veterinary Sciences University of Messina Messina Italy
- Bu-Ali Sina University (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Otranto, Domenico
- ORCID
- Venue
- Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-04-20
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1274-1280
- ISSN
- 1865-1674 (ISSN-L)
- 1865-1682
- OpenAlex
- W3147356508
- Semantic Scholar
- 0b8defe5f9c2d0da567d2c468e61a58d52fdc02d
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Transboundary and Emerging Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
- Keywords
- Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilaria repens, canine heartworm disease, Linosa, Lampedusa, Aedes albopictus, zoonotic filariasis, dogs, cats, invasive mosquito species
- MeSH terms
- Aedes, Animals, Cat Diseases, Cats, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Europe, Dirofilaria repens
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review