Cited by 32Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsTeratomas and Epidermoid Cysts

Ultrasound and MR-imaging in preoperative evaluation of two rare cases of scar endometriosis

Open access
Pados, George, Tympanidis, John, Zafrakas, Menelaos, Athanatos, Dimitrios, Bontis, John N·2008·Cases Journal

Abstract

Scar or incisional endometriosis is a rare, often misdiagnosed, pathologic condition of the abdominal wall. Two cases of incisional endometriosis are presented. Both patients presented with atypical cyclic pain and palpable nodules on scars of previous cesarean sections. In both cases, the mass was totally excised, after accurate preoperative evaluation with 2-D ultrasound, power Doppler and MRI. Microscopic examination confirmed the preoperatively presumed diagnosis of cutaneous endometriosis. In cases of suspected scar endometriosis, preoperative diagnostic imaging is valuable in determining the extent of disease, thus enhancing accurate and total excision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1757-1626-1-97

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In these studies, endometriosis appeared homogeneously hypointense or isointense, or heterogeneous with focal areas of high and low signal intensity, suggesting old haemorrhage or fibrosis on T2-weighted and T1-weighted fat-suppressed imaging.

    “In these studies, endometriosis appeared homogeneously hypointense or isointense, or heterogeneous with focal areas of high and low signal intensity, suggesting old haemorrhage or fibrosis on T2-weighted and T1-weighted fat-suppressed imaging.”

    From Appearance of abdominal wall endometriosis on MR imaging (2010) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Several case reports and a few cohorts, up to eight patients, using MR imaging in AWE have been described.

    “At this moment, to our knowledge, several case reports and a few cohorts, up to eight patients using MR imaging in AWE, have been described in the literature [1, 7, 14–17].”

    From Appearance of abdominal wall endometriosis on MR imaging (2010) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pados, G., Tympanidis, J., Zafrakas, M., Athanatos, D., & Bontis, J. N.
Affiliations
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Venue
Cases Journal
Published
2008-08-18
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
97-97
ISSN
1757-1626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159658906
Cited by
32
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cases Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Teratomas and Epidermoid Cysts
Keywords
scar endometriosis, abdominal wall endometriosis, preoperative imaging, power Doppler, magnetic resonance imaging, cesarean section scar, cyclic abdominal pain, palpable nodules, surgical excision, cutaneous endometriosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review