Cited by 169Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Incisional endometriosis after cesarean section, episiotomy and other gynecologic procedures

Gunes, Muzeyyen, Kayikcioglu, Fulya, Ozturkoglu, Esmen, Haberal, Ali·2005·Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research

Abstract

AIM: To report 11 cases of incisional endometriosis after cesarean section, episiotomy and other gynecologic procedures. The diagnostic approaches and therapies for incisional endometriosis are also evaluated. METHODS: Eleven patients who presented with a painful nodule that was increasing in size during menstruation on the scar of a previous gynecologic procedure were examined retrospectively. RESULTS: All patients presented with a palpable painful lesion, located on the cesarean section incision, perineal episiotomy incision or the vaginal cuff after hysterectomy. All masses were increasing during menstruation and all patients had been having cyclical pain that worsened during menstrual periods. The mean age of the patients was 28.2 years. The onset of symptoms was referred at variable intervals after surgery ranging between 2 and 11 years (mean: 5.72 years). Ultrasound examination confirmed hypoechoic mass septated with cystic and solid components in the abdomen without intra-abdominal communications. All endometriotic masses were completely excised under general anesthesia. The excised masses were sent for microscopic examination which confirmed the diagnosis of endometriosis. CONCLUSION: Incisional endometriosis seems to be common in women who have had a cesarean section, although it does occur after other procedures and de novo. It is suggested that caution is exercised during gynecologic procedures to avoid transplantation of endometrium to the anterior abdominal wall. The preferred management is to excise the lesion completely even if this necessitates fascial excision.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2005.00322.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gunes et al. (2005) describe a mechanical transplantation theory in which the endometrium is accidentally transplanted into the surgical scar in patients with no history of endometriosis prior to surgical procedures.

    “Gunes et al. (2005) describe a mechanical transplantation theory in which the endometrium is accidentally transplanted into the surgical scar in patients with no history of endometriosis prior to surgical procedures.”
  • Gunes et al. (2005) note a theory of metaplasia in which scar endometriosis appears de novo.

    “Furthermore, they note a theory of metaplasia in which scar endometriosis appears de novo [30].”
  • Typical cases of abdominal incision endometriosis appear following cesarean deliveries.

    “inadvertent, iatrogenic transfer of endometrial tissue is the most likely reason that results in abdominal incision endometriosis, and typical cases appear following cesarean deliveries.15”
  • Inadvertent, iatrogenic transfer of endometrial tissue is the most likely reason that results in abdominal incision endometriosis.

    “inadvertent, iatrogenic transfer of endometrial tissue is the most likely reason that results in abdominal incision endometriosis, and typical cases appear following cesarean deliveries.15”
  • The most plausible theory for scar endometriosis is direct mechanical implantation: endometrial tissue from uterine opening is accidentally implanted into the abdominal incision and grows to form a mass that increases in size during menses and becomes symptomatic.

    “Most studies said that scar endometriosis involves surgical procedures in which the uterus is opened, endometrial tissue gets accidentally implanted into the abdominal incision and it grows to form a mass that increases in size during menses and becomes symptomatic, this is the most plausible theory named direct mechanical implantation [14].”

    From Case report: Caesarean scar endometriosis – A rare entity (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gunes, M., Kayikcioglu, F., Ozturkoglu, E., & Haberal, A.
Venue
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09-15
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
471-475
ISSN
  • 1341-8076 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0756
OpenAlex
W2071700883
Cited by
169
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
cesarean section, episiotomy, hysterectomy, postoperative endometriosis, ultrasonography, surgical excision, endometrial transplantation
MeSH terms
Adult, Cesarean Section, Endometriosis, Episiotomy, Female, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review