The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hemodynamic monitoring and management in patients undergoing high risk surgery: a survey among North American and European anesthesiologists
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Several studies have demonstrated that perioperative hemodynamic optimization has the ability to improve postoperative outcome in high-risk surgical patients. All of these studies aimed at optimizing cardiac output and/or oxygen delivery in the perioperative period. We conducted a survey with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) to assess current hemodynamic management practices in patients undergoing high-risk surgery in Europe and in the United States. Methods: A survey including 33 specific questions was emailed to 2,500 randomly selected active members of the ASA and to active ESA members. Results: Overall, 368 questionnaires were completed, 57.1% from ASA and 42.9% from ESA members. Cardiac output is monitored by only 34% of ASA and ESA respondents (P = 0.49) while central venous pressure is monitored by 73% of ASA respondents and 84% of ESA respondents (P < 0.01). Specifically, the pulmonary artery catheter is being used much more frequently in the US than in Europe in the setup of high-risk surgery (85.1% vs. 55.3% respectively, P < 0.001). Clinical experience, blood pressure, central venous pressure, and urine output are the most widely indicators of volume expansion. Finally, 86.5% of ASA respondents and 98.1% of ESA respondents believe that their current hemodynamic management could be improved. Conclusions: In conclusion, these results point to a considerable gap between the accumulating evidence about the benefits of perioperative hemodynamic optimization and the available technologies that may facilitate its clinical implementation, and clinical practices in both Europe and the United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock
Rivers, E., Nguyen, B., Havstad, S., Ressler, J., Muzzin, A., Knoblich, B., Peterson, E., & Tomlanovich, M. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010307 · Cited by 10,743
A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population
Haynes, A. B., Weiser, T. G., Berry, W. R., Lipsitz, S. R., Breizat, A.-H. S., Dellinger, E. P., Herbosa, T., Joseph, S., Kibatala, P. L., Lapitan, M. C. M., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa0810119 · Cited by 5,688 · cited 1×
“Recent and most important advances in anesthesia and critical care have been provided by “check list” implementations [32,33].”
BackgroundAn Intervention to Decrease Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in the ICU
Pronovost, P., Needham, D., Berenholtz, S., Sinopoli, D., Chu, H., Cosgrove, S., Sexton, B., Hyzy, R., Welsh, R., Roth, G., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa061115 · Cited by 4,387
An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data
Weiser, T. G., Regenbogen, S. E., Thompson, K. D., Haynes, A. B., Lipsitz, S. R., Berry, W. R., & Gawande, A. A. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60878-8 · Cited by 2,511
Shoemaker, W. C., Appel, P. L., Kram, H. B., Waxman, K., & Lee, T.-S. (1988) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.94.6.1176 · Cited by 1,794
Brandstrup, B., Tønnesen, H., Beier-Holgersen, R., Hjortsø, E., Ørding, H., Lindorff-Larsen, K., Rasmussen, M. S., Lanng, C., Wallin, L., Iversen, L. H., et al. (2003) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000094387.50865.23 · Cited by 1,585
Marik, P. E., Baram, M., & Vahid, B. (2008) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.07-2331 · Cited by 1,516
MICHARD, F., BOUSSAT, S., CHEMLA, D., ANGUEL, N., MERCAT, A., LECARPENTIER, Y., RICHARD, C., PINSKY, M. R., & TEBOUL, J.-L. (2000) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.162.1.9903035 · Cited by 1,458
Marik, P. E., Cavallazzi, R., Vasu, T., & Hirani, A. (2009) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181a590da · Cited by 1,272
Boyd, O. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510220055034 · Cited by 997
Gan, T. J., Soppitt, A., Maroof, M., El-Moalem, H., Robertson, K. M., Moretti, E., Dwane, P., & Glass, P. S. A. (2002) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-200210000-00012 · Cited by 953
Hamilton, M. A., Cecconi, M., & Rhodes, A. (2011) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181eeaae5 · Cited by 898
Pearse, R., Dawson, D., Fawcett, J., Rhodes, A., Grounds, R. M., & Bennett, E. D. (2005) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc3887 · Cited by 698
Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge*
Osman, D., Ridel, C., Ray, P., Monnet, X., Anguel, N., Richard, C., & Teboul, J.-L. (2007) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000249851.94101.4f · Cited by 695
Identification and characterisation of the high-risk surgical population in the United Kingdom
Pearse, R. M., Harrison, D. A., James, P., Watson, D., Hinds, C., Rhodes, A., Grounds, R. M., & Bennett, E. D. (2006) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc4928 · Cited by 667
Wakeling, H. G., McFall, M. R., Jenkins, C. S., Woods, W. G. A., Miles, W. F. A., Barclay, G. R., & Fleming, S. C. (2005) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aei223 · Cited by 606
Venous Function and Central Venous Pressure: A Physiologic Story
Gelman, S., Warner, D. S., & Warner, M. A. (2008) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e3181672607 · Cited by 575
Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?
Braithwaite, D., Emery, J., de Lusignan, S., & Sutton, S. (2003) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmg509 · Cited by 474
Perel, A., Pizov, R., & Cotev, S. (1987) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-198710000-00009 · Cited by 403
Self-citationRadial Artery Cannulation: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Anatomic and Physiologic Investigations
Brzezinski, M., Luisetti, T., & London, M. J. (2009) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181bbd416 · Cited by 354
Trends in the Use of the Pulmonary Artery Catheter in the United States, 1993-2004
Wiener, R. S., & Welch, H. G. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.4.423 · Cited by 343
Early Goal-Directed Therapy after Major Surgery Reduces Complications and Duration of Hospital Stay
Elliott, D. (2006) · Journal of the Intensive Care Society · doi:10.1177/175114370600700123 · Cited by 223
Cannesson, M., Attof, Y., Rosamel, P., Desebbe, O., Joseph, P., Metton, O., Bastien, O., & Lehot, J.-J. (2007) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/01.anes.0000267593.72744.20 · Cited by 216
Self-citationMoonesinghe, R., Mythen, M. G., & Grocott, M. P. W. (2010) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181e1655b · Cited by 97
Postal Surveys versus Electronic Mail Surveys: The Tortoise and the Hare Revisited
Mavis, B., & Brocato, J. J. (1998) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/016327879802100306 · Cited by 91
The Pulmonary Artery Catheter, 1967–2007
Rubenfeld, G. D., McNamara-Aslin, E., & Rubinson, L. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.4.458 · Cited by 59
Leibowitz, A. B. (2008) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31819304e5 · Cited by 2
Cited by
Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update
Monnet, X., Marik, P. E., & Teboul, J.-L. (2016) · Annals of Intensive Care · doi:10.1186/s13613-016-0216-7 · Cited by 600
Metadata
- Authors
- Cannesson, M., Pestel, G., Ricks, C., Hoeft, A., & Perel, A.
- Venue
- Critical Care
- Published
- 2011-08-15
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- R197-R197
- ISSN
- 1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979650150
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 25.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
