The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The human olfactory receptor repertoire
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The mammalian olfactory apparatus is able to recognize and distinguish thousands of structurally diverse volatile chemicals. This chemosensory function is mediated by a very large family of seven-transmembrane olfactory (odorant) receptors encoded by approximately 1,000 genes, the majority of which are believed to be pseudogenes in humans. RESULTS: The strategy of our sequence database mining for full-length, functional candidate odorant receptor genes was based on the high overall sequence similarity and presence of a number of conserved sequence motifs in all known mammalian odorant receptors as well as the absence of introns in their coding sequences. We report here the identification and physical cloning of 347 putative human full-length odorant receptor genes. Comparative sequence analysis of the predicted gene products allowed us to identify and define a number of consensus sequence motifs and structural features of this vast family of receptors. A new nomenclature for human odorant receptors based on their chromosomal localization and phylogenetic analysis is proposed. We believe that these sequences represent the essentially complete repertoire of functional human odorant receptors. CONCLUSIONS: The identification and cloning of all functional human odorant receptor genes is an important initial step in understanding receptor-ligand specificity and combinatorial encoding of odorant stimuli in human olfaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
(1987) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 · Cited by 59,715
CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x · Cited by 44,647
Thompson, J. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.24.4876 · Cited by 38,993
Hall, T. A. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Symposium Series · doi:10.14601/phytopathol_mediterr-14998u1.29 · Cited by 38,297
Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, C. F. G. R., Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057062 · Cited by 24,216
PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package (Version 3.2)
Felsenstein, J. (1989) · Cladistics · Cited by 17,682
The sequence of the human genome
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058040 · Cited by 13,909
Self-citationTree View: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers
Page, R. D. M. (1996) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/12.4.357 · Cited by 10,178
A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition
Buck, L., & Axel, R. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-x · Cited by 4,987
The scanning model for translation: an update.
Kozak, M. (1989) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.108.2.229 · Cited by 3,486
Cited by
Fredriksson, R., Lagerström, M. C., Lundin, L.-G., & Schiöth, H. B. (2003) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1124/mol.63.6.1256 · Cited by 2,941
Concerted and Birth-and-Death Evolution of Multigene Families
Nei, M., & Rooney, A. P. (2005) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112240 · Cited by 1,298
Human olfaction: from genomic variation to phenotypic diversity
Hasin-Brumshtein, Y., Lancet, D., & Olender, T. (2009) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2009.02.002 · Cited by 176
Yuan, T. T.-T., Toy, P., McClary, J. A., Lin, R. J., Miyamoto, N. G., & Kretschmer, P. J. (2001) · Gene · doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(01)00709-0 · Cited by 66
Okamoto, C., & Ando, K. (2024) · Biophysics and Physicobiology · doi:10.2142/biophysico.bppb-v21.0007 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Zozulya, S., Echeverri, F., & Nguyen, T.
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2001-06-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- RESEARCH0018-RESEARCH0018
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- OpenAlex
- W1479720172
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The human olfactory receptor repertoire. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/gb-2001-2-6-research0018
- The paper
- Zozulya, S., Echeverri, F., & Nguyen, T. (2001). The human olfactory receptor repertoire. Genome Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2001-2-6-research0018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.