The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular archeology of L1 insertions in the human genome
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: As the rough draft of the human genome sequence nears a finished product and other genome-sequencing projects accumulate sequence data exponentially, bioinformatics is emerging as an important tool for studies of transposon biology. In particular, L1 elements exhibit a variety of sequence structures after insertion into the human genome that are amenable to computational analysis. We carried out a detailed analysis of the anatomy and distribution of L1 elements in the human genome using a new computer program, TSDfinder, designed to identify transposon boundaries precisely. RESULTS: Structural variants of L1 elements shared similar trends in the length and quality of their target site duplications (TSDs) and poly(A) tails. Furthermore, we found no correlation between the composition and genomic location of the pre-insertion locus and the resulting anatomy of the L1 insertion. We verified that L1 insertions with TSDs have the 5'-TTAAAA-3' cleavage site associated with L1 endonuclease activity. In addition, the second target DNA cut required for L1 insertion weakly matches the consensus pattern TTAAAA. On the other hand, the L1-internal breakpoints of deleted and inverted L1 elements do not resemble L1 endonuclease cleavage sites. Finally, the genome sequence data indicate that whereas singly inverted elements are common, doubly inverted elements are almost never found. CONCLUSIONS: The sequence data give no indication that the creation of L1 structural variants depends on characteristics of the insertion locus. In addition, the formation of 5' truncated and 5' inverted L1s are probably not due to the action of the L1 endonuclease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As the vast majority of L1s in the human genome are 5′ truncated (average L1 length is approximately 900bp, 90-95% of all L1s are 5′trunctated), this analysis was unsurprisingly skewed towards the 3′ end of L1s.”
From SIRT6 represses LINE1 retrotransposons by ribosylating KAP1 but this repression fails with stress and age (2014) · cites this paper as [53]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302 · cited 1×
“The BLASTX program [45] was used to translate our set of full-length L1 DNA sequences in all three reading frames and compare them to the L1.”
MethodInitial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, C. F. G. R., Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057062 · Cited by 24,216
The sequence of the human genome
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058040 · Cited by 13,909
Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences
Schneider, T. D., & Stephens, R. M. (1990) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/18.20.6097 · Cited by 3,354 · cited 1×
“DNA sequence logos [59] of TSDs were generated using binary code downloaded from the site [60].”
MethodBLAST 2 Sequences, a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences
Tatusova, T. A., & Madden, T. L. (1999) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13575.x · Cited by 1,789
The Sequence of the Human Genome
Venter, J. C., Smith, H. O., & Adams, M. D. (2015) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2014.237016 · Cited by 1,665
Luan, D. D., Korman, M. H., Jakubczak, J. L., & Eickbush, T. H. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90078-5 · Cited by 1,173 · cited 2×
“L1 poly(A) tails During the process of TPRT, whereby a copy of an L1 is inserted into the genome, reverse transcription is believed to be primed on the poly(A) tail of the L1 transcript [12,14,17,27].”
BackgroundHuman L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition
Feng, Q., Moran, J. V., Kazazian, H. H., & Boeke, J. D. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81997-2 · Cited by 1,139 · cited 7×
“The functional significance of ORF1 is not clear, whereas ORF2 contains three domains critical for L1 propagation: endonuclease [12], reverse transcriptase [7,13], and a 3 ́-terminal Zn finger-like domain [14].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationHigh frequency retrotransposition in cultured mammalian cells
Moran, J. V., Holmes, S. E., Naas, T. P., DeBerardinis, R. J., Boeke, J. D., & Kazazian, H. H. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81998-4 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 10×
“The functional significance of ORF1 is not clear, whereas ORF2 contains three domains critical for L1 propagation: endonuclease [12], reverse transcriptase [7,13], and a 3 ́-terminal Zn finger-like domain [14].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationFour Evolutionary Strata on the Human X Chromosome
Lahn, B. T., & Page, D. C. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5441.964 · Cited by 1,010 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, the concentration of L1s with TSDs on the p arm of the X chromosome is lower than that on the q arm (Figure 8). Lahn and Page [ 52 ] have hypothesized that the distal p arm is the site of the youngest evolutionary strata on the X chromosome, indicating that the X and Y chromosomes actively recombined at t…”
BackgroundInterspersed repeats and other mementos of transposable elements in mammalian genomes
Smit, A. F. (1999) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(99)00031-3 · Cited by 949 · cited 1×
“This modest majority may reflect a weak selection against L1s in the same orientation; such insertions could result in premature truncation of a gene’s mRNA due to the L1 polyadenylation signal [27,48,49].”
BackgroundHuman LINE retrotransposons generate processed pseudogenes
Esnault, C., Maestre, J., & Heidmann, T. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/74184 · Cited by 835 · cited 1×
“Also, L1-encoded proteins were almost certainly involved in the insertion of most of the Alu elements and processed pseudogenes in the genome [6-10]; thus, L1s are probably responsible, directly or indirectly, for the genesis of most of the transposed fraction of human DNA.”
BackgroundReverse Transcriptase Encoded by a Human Transposable Element
Mathias, S. L., Scott, A. F., Kazazian, H. H., Boeke, J. D., & Gabriel, A. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1722352 · Cited by 774 · cited 2×
“The functional significance of ORF1 is not clear, whereas ORF2 contains three domains critical for L1 propagation: endonuclease [12], reverse transcriptase [7,13], and a 3 ́-terminal Zn finger-like domain [14].”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe origin of interspersed repeats in the human genome
Smit, A. F. A. (1996) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(96)80030-x · Cited by 611 · cited 1×
“Nevertheless, this large fraction is a testament to the efficiency with which these elements, now mostly fossil sequences [2-5], have been able to propagate, and it is clear that they played a large part in determining the structure”
BackgroundSequence patterns indicate an enzymatic involvement in integration of mammalian retroposons
Jurka, J. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.5.1872 · Cited by 560 · cited 2×
“This quality is consistent with previous computational [6] and biochemical [12,34] observations of A-rich target sequences of L1s and Alu sequences.”
BackgroundResultThe impact of L1 retrotransposons on the human genome
Kazazian, H. H., & Moran, J. V. (1998) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0598-19 · Cited by 520 · cited 2×
“Several instances of disease have been attributed to the disruption of genes by an L1 insertion (for a review see [ 42 ]).”
BackgroundHuman L1 Retrotransposition Is Associated with Genetic Instability In Vivo
Symer, D. E., Connelly, C. J., Szak, S. T., Caputo, E. M., Cost, G. J., Parmigiani, G., & Boeke, J. D. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00839-5 · Cited by 479
Self-citationIsolation of an Active Human Transposable Element
Dombroski, B. A., Mathias, S. L., Nanthakumar, E. J., Scott, A. F., & Kazazian, H. H. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1662412 · Cited by 455 · cited 2×
“A full-length, active human L1 is approximately 6,000 nucleotides long and consists of a 5 ́ UTR with an internal promoter, two open reading frames (ORFs) separated by a 63-nucleotide intergenic region, and a 3 ́ UTR terminating in a poly(A) tail [11] (Figure 1a).”
BackgroundMany human L1 elements are capable of retrotransposition
Sassaman, D. M., Dombroski, B. A., Moran, J. V., Kimberland, M. L., Naas, T., DeBerardinis, R. J., Gabriel, A., Swergold, G. D., & Kazazian, H. H. (1997) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0597-37 · Cited by 452 · cited 3×
“It is estimated that 30-60 full-length active L1s reside in the average human genome [ 37 ].”
BackgroundInfluentialIdentification, Characterization, and Cell Specificity of a Human LINE-1 Promoter
Swergold, G. D. (1990) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.10.12.6718 · Cited by 450
Bailey, J. A., Carrel, L., Chakravarti, A., & Eichler, E. E. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.12.6634 · Cited by 431 · cited 3×
“It has been suggested that the high concentration of L1s on the X chromosome may have a role in X inactivation of select genes [39].”
BackgroundResultAncestral, Mammalian-wide Subfamilies of LINE-1 Repetitive Sequences
Smit, A. F. A., Tóth, G. J., Riggs, A. D., & Jurka, J. (1995) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1994.0095 · Cited by 384 · cited 6×
“The most variable features of L1s are the poly(A) tail, which has a variable length and can contain simple repeats, the polyadenylation signal, and the 3 ́ UTR, but many changes have also been reported in the coding regions of young L1s, especially in a segment of ORF1 [21-24].”
BackgroundInfluentialA first-generation X-inactivation profile of the human X chromosome
Carrel, L., Cottle, A. A., Goglin, K. C., & Willard, H. F. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.25.14440 · Cited by 354 · cited 1×
“(NAD+) gamma, biglycan, tafazzin, deoxyribonuclease I-like 1, and emerin [51].”
Origin of the human L1 elements: Proposed progenitor genes deduced from a consensus DNA sequence
Scott, A. F., Schmeckpeper, B. J., Abdelrazik, M., Comey, C., O’Hara, B. F., Rossiter, J. P., Cooley, T., Heath, P. J., Smith, K. D., & Margolet, L. (1987) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/0888-7543(87)90003-6 · Cited by 313 · cited 1×
“Characteristics of 5 truncated L1 elements The majority of L1s in the human genome are significantly 5 truncated [25]; indeed, only 5% of the 3 intact L1s in our study were full-length (Table 1).”
BackgroundL1 (LINE-1) Retrotransposon Evolution and Amplification in Recent Human History
Boissinot, S., Chevret, P., & Furano, A. V. (2000) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026372 · Cited by 312 · cited 2×
“L1.3 is one of the most active L1s in a cell-culture assay [37] and is a member of the human-specific Ta-1 subfamily of L1s which encompasses the vast majority of active, young L1 elements in the human genome [ 22 ].”
BackgroundFrequent Human Genomic DNA Transduction Driven by LINE-1 RetrotranspositionPreprint
Pickeral, O. K., Makałowski, W., Boguski, M. S., & Boeke, J. D. (2000) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.10.4.411 · Cited by 279 · cited 2×
“Consequently, the 3 TSD of the resulting L1 insertion event can be located hundreds of nucleotides downstream of the L1 sequence itself [29,30].”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationTransduction of 3'-flanking sequences is common in L1 retrotransposition
Goodier, J. L. (2000) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/9.4.653 · Cited by 276 · cited 2×
“Consequently, the 3 TSD of the resulting L1 insertion event can be located hundreds of nucleotides downstream of the L1 sequence itself [29,30].”
BackgroundResultBucheton, A., Paro, R., Sang, H. M., Pélisson, A., & Finnegan, D. (1984) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(84)90536-1 · Cited by 275 · cited 1×
“The poly(A) tails found in I factors, a transposable element in Drosophila melanogaster similar to L1s, contain several copies of the simple repeat TAA instead of a traditional poly(A) tail [40,41].”
BackgroundLINEs and Alus — the polyA connection
Boeke, J. D. (1997) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0597-6 · Cited by 263 · cited 1×
“Also, L1-encoded proteins were almost certainly involved in the insertion of most of the Alu elements and processed pseudogenes in the genome [6-10]; thus, L1s are probably responsible, directly or indirectly, for the genesis of most of the transposed fraction of human DNA.”
BackgroundSelf-citationTwin Priming: A Proposed Mechanism for the Creation of Inversions in L1 RetrotranspositionPreprint
Ostertag, E. M., & Kazazian, H. H. (2001) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.205701 · Cited by 255 · cited 3×
“Instead, our findings support the recently proposed twin-priming model for inversion [47]; as we showed above, the 3 end topstrand cleavage product has a modest bias to be a ‘T’ nucleotide (Figure 3b) and we indeed see a modest preference for a complementary ‘A’ nucleotide at the corresponding position of the inversio…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCost, G. J., & Boeke, J. D. (1998) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi981858s · Cited by 242 · cited 2×
“This quality is consistent with previous computational [6] and biochemical [12,34] observations of A-rich target sequences of L1s and Alu sequences.”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationHolmes, S. E., Dombroski, B. A., Krebs, C. M., Boehm, C. D., & Kazazian, H. H. (1994) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0694-143 · Cited by 237 · cited 2×
“Also, 3 transduction events associated with L1 insertions add an additional structural variation [27,28]; such elements are generated when the element’s transcript includes some downstream flanking sequences that become transduced, along with the L1 sequence, to a new genomic locus.”
BackgroundAlu Repeats: A Source for the Genesis of Primate Microsatellites
Arcot, S. S., Wang, Z., Weber, J. L., Deininger, P. L., & Batzer, M. A. (1995) · Genomics · doi:10.1006/geno.1995.1224 · Cited by 226
LINE-1: A mammalian transposable element
Fanning, T. G., & Singer, M. (1987) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Structure and Expression · doi:10.1016/0167-4781(87)90112-6 · Cited by 222 · cited 1×
“A new L1 insertion is usually flanked by short direct repeats derived from the target DNA locus upon L1 integration [19]; these repeats are referred to as target site duplications (TSDs), and can range from just a few to more than 200 nucleotides in length [14].”
BackgroundNarita, N., Nishio, H., Kitoh, Y., Ishikawa, Y., Ishikawa, Y., Minami, R., Nakamura, H., & Matsuo, M. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci116402 · Cited by 207
Selection Against Deleterious LINE-1-Containing Loci in the Human Lineage
Boissinot, S., Entezam, A., & Furano, A. V. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003893 · Cited by 179 · cited 3×
“This observation is consistent with previous reports that the density of L1s on the X chromosome is almost double that on the autosomes [1,38,39].”
BackgroundResultKimberland, M. L., Divoký, V., Prchal, J. T., Schwahn, U., Berger, W., & Kazazian, H. H. (1999) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/8.8.1557 · Cited by 173 · cited 2×
“The progenitor elements of these insertions were always fulllength or near full-length L1s with intact ORFs that were active in retrotransposition assays [11,14,35-37].”
BackgroundMizrokhi, L. J., Georgieva, S. G., & Ilyin, Y. V. (1988) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(88)80013-8 · Cited by 169 · cited 1×
“They propagate by being transcribed from an internal RNA polymerase II promoter [ 15 ,16], and then use their endonuclease and reverse transcriptase respectively to nick a target site and reverse transcribe L1 RNA, integrating the L1 into a new genomic locus [12,17,18]; this process is known as target-site-primed reve…”
Rapid amplification of a retrotransposon subfamily is evolving the mouse genome
DeBerardinis, R. J., Goodier, J. L., Ostertag, E. M., & Kazazian, H. H. (1998) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/3104 · Cited by 149 · cited 1×
“Nevertheless, this large fraction is a testament to the efficiency with which these elements, now mostly fossil sequences [2-5], have been able to propagate, and it is clear that they played a large part in determining the structure”
BackgroundSequence analysis of a Kpnl family member near the 3′ end of human β-globin gene
Hattori, M., Hidaka, S., & Sakaki, Y. (1985) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/13.21.7813 · Cited by 133 · cited 4×
“An extra 131 nucleotides are found in the 5 UTR of some L1 elements, starting at nucleotide position 777 [26].”
BackgroundInfluentialRecently transposed Alu repeats result from multiple source genes
Matera, A. G., Hellmann‐Blumberg, U., Hintz, M. F., & Schmid, C. W. (1990) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/18.20.6019 · Cited by 132 · cited 1×
“Nevertheless, this large fraction is a testament to the efficiency with which these elements, now mostly fossil sequences [2-5], have been able to propagate, and it is clear that they played a large part in determining the structure”
BackgroundGenomic Characterization of Recent Human LINE-1 Insertions: Evidence Supporting Random InsertionPreprint
Ovchinnikov, I. V., Troxel, A. B., & Swergold, G. D. (2001) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.194701 · Cited by 125 · cited 15×
“The most variable features of L1s are the poly(A) tail, which has a variable length and can contain simple repeats, the polyadenylation signal, and the 3 ́ UTR, but many changes have also been reported in the coding regions of young L1s, especially in a segment of ORF1 [21-24].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAdaptive Evolution in LINE-1 Retrotransposons
Boissinot, S., & Furano, A. V. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003765 · Cited by 122 · cited 3×
“The functional significance of ORF1 is not clear, whereas ORF2 contains three domains critical for L1 propagation: endonuclease [12], reverse transcriptase [7,13], and a 3´-terminal Zn finger-like domain [14].”
BackgroundDombroski, B. A., Scott, A. F., & Kazazian, H. H. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.14.6513 · Cited by 119 · cited 2×
“The progenitor elements of these insertions were always fulllength or near full-length L1s with intact ORFs that were active in retrotransposition assays [11,14,35-37].”
BackgroundMinakami, R., Kurose, K., Etoh, K., Furuhata, Y., Hattori, M., & Sakaki, Y. (1992) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/20.12.3139 · Cited by 112 · cited 1×
“3 reference sequence, ensuring the presence of an intact L1 internal promoter [16,43,44].”
BackgroundDombroski, B. A., Feng, Q., Mathias, S. L., Sassaman, D. M., Scott, A. F., Kazazian, H. H., & Boeke, J. D. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.14.7.4485 · Cited by 97
Self-citationRetrotransposon R1Bm endonuclease cleaves the target sequence
Feng, Q., Schumann, G. G., & Boeke, J. D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.5.2083 · Cited by 96 · cited 9×
“There is evidence that the related sequence-specific R1 element endonuclease makes both cuts in the target DNA [18].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationDhellin, O., Maestre, J., & Heidmann, T. (1997) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/16.21.6590 · Cited by 76 · cited 1×
“Also, L1-encoded proteins were almost certainly involved in the insertion of most of the Alu elements and processed pseudogenes in the genome [6-10]; thus, L1s are probably responsible, directly or indirectly, for the genesis of most of the transposed fraction of human DNA.”
BackgroundTarget DNA chromatinization modulates nicking by L1 endonuclease
Cost, G. J. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.2.573 · Cited by 74 · cited 1×
“[6,8,53].”
LINE-1: a human transposable element
Singer, M., Krek, V., McMillan, J., Swergold, G. D., & Thayer, R. E. (1993) · Gene · doi:10.1016/0378-1119(93)90064-a · Cited by 71 · cited 1×
“3 reference sequence, ensuring the presence of an intact L1 internal promoter [16,43,44].”
BackgroundClements, A. (1998) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/26.15.3528 · Cited by 59 · cited 3×
“Finally, residues 472(G) and 474(D) in the conserved Z motif in ORF2 are required for reverse transcriptase activity [46].”
BackgroundMethodSubfamily structure and evolution of the human L1 family of repetive sequences
Jurka, J. (1989) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02602921 · Cited by 49
Dombroski, B. A., Feng, Q., Mathias, S. L., Sassaman, D. M., Scott, A. F., Kazazian, H. H., & Boeke, J. D. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.14.7.4485-4492.1994 · Cited by 36 · cited 1×
“The functional significance of ORF1 is not clear, whereas ORF2 contains three domains critical for L1 propagation: endonuclease [12], reverse transcriptase [7,13], and a 3 ́-terminal Zn finger-like domain [14].”
BackgroundSelf-citationChaboissier, M., Finnegan, D., & Bucheton, A. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.13.2467 · Cited by 35
Eickbush, T. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5407.1465 · Cited by 33 · cited 1×
“This modest majority may reflect a weak selection against L1s in the same orientation; such insertions could result in premature truncation of a gene’s mRNA due to the L1 polyadenylation signal [27,48,49].”
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Symer DE, Connelly C, Szak ST, Caputo EM, Cost GJ, Parmigiani G, Boeke JD: Human L1 retrotransposition is associated with genetic instability in vivo. Cell. 2002, 110: 327-338. · DOI
- Pickeral OK: Bioinformatics of human retrotransposons. PhD dissertation. Edited by: Baltimore MD. 2000, The Johns Hopkins University
- NCBI Computational Biology Branch: David Landsman's group. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Landsman/TSDfinder/]
- BLAST 2 Sequences. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/bl2seq/bl2.html]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution
Cordaux, R., & Batzer, M. A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2640 · Cited by 1,692
“Indeed, as a result of TPRT and decay over time, most L1 copies are inactivated by truncations, internal rearrangements and mutation”
Ten things you should know about transposable elements
Bourque, G., Burns, K. H., Gehring, M., Gorbunova, V., Seluanov, A., Hammell, M., Imbeault, M., Izsvák, Z., Levin, H. L., Macfarlan, T. S., et al. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1577-z · Cited by 1,430
Roles for retrotransposon insertions in human disease
Hancks, D. C., & Kazazian, H. H. (2016) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/s13100-016-0065-9 · Cited by 670
“Most LINE-1 s in the human genome are grossly truncated at their 5′-end [6, 36, 37].”
BackgroundInfluentialActive human retrotransposons: variation and disease
Hancks, D. C., & Kazazian, H. H. (2012) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2012.02.006 · Cited by 592
Human L1 element target‐primed reverse transcription in vitro
Cost, G. J., Feng, Q., Jacquier, A., & Boeke, J. D. (2002) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdf592 · Cited by 519
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Szak, S. T., Pickeral, O. K., Makalowski, W., Boguski, M. S., Landsman, D., & Boeke, J. D.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Human Genome Sciences (United States) (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Boeke, Jef D
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2002-09-19
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- research0052-research0052
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- PMC
- PMC134481
- OpenAlex
- W2139253234
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 12.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Genome biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (CA-16519, P01CA016519)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
- Keywords
- LINE-1 retrotransposons, human genome, transposon insertion, target site duplication, poly(A) tail, structural variants
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Humans, Poly A, Recombination, Genetic, Genome, Human, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Retroelements, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review