The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular archeology of L1 insertions in the human genome
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: As the rough draft of the human genome sequence nears a finished product and other genome-sequencing projects accumulate sequence data exponentially, bioinformatics is emerging as an important tool for studies of transposon biology. In particular, L1 elements exhibit a variety of sequence structures after insertion into the human genome that are amenable to computational analysis. We carried out a detailed analysis of the anatomy and distribution of L1 elements in the human genome using a new computer program, TSDfinder, designed to identify transposon boundaries precisely. RESULTS: Structural variants of L1 elements shared similar trends in the length and quality of their target site duplications (TSDs) and poly(A) tails. Furthermore, we found no correlation between the composition and genomic location of the pre-insertion locus and the resulting anatomy of the L1 insertion. We verified that L1 insertions with TSDs have the 5'-TTAAAA-3' cleavage site associated with L1 endonuclease activity. In addition, the second target DNA cut required for L1 insertion weakly matches the consensus pattern TTAAAA. On the other hand, the L1-internal breakpoints of deleted and inverted L1 elements do not resemble L1 endonuclease cleavage sites. Finally, the genome sequence data indicate that whereas singly inverted elements are common, doubly inverted elements are almost never found. CONCLUSIONS: The sequence data give no indication that the creation of L1 structural variants depends on characteristics of the insertion locus. In addition, the formation of 5' truncated and 5' inverted L1s are probably not due to the action of the L1 endonuclease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As the vast majority of L1s in the human genome are 5′ truncated (average L1 length is approximately 900bp, 90-95% of all L1s are 5′trunctated), this analysis was unsurprisingly skewed towards the 3′ end of L1s.”
From SIRT6 represses LINE1 retrotransposons by ribosylating KAP1 but this repression fails with stress and age (2014) · cites this paper as [53]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302 · cited 1×
“The BLASTX program [45] was used to translate our set of full-length L1 DNA sequences in all three reading frames and compare them to the L1.”
MethodInitial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, C. F. G. R., Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057062 · Cited by 24,216
The sequence of the human genome
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058040 · Cited by 13,909
Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences
Schneider, T. D., & Stephens, R. M. (1990) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/18.20.6097 · Cited by 3,354 · cited 1×
“DNA sequence logos [59] of TSDs were generated using binary code downloaded from the site [60].”
MethodBLAST 2 Sequences, a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences
Tatusova, T. A., & Madden, T. L. (1999) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13575.x · Cited by 1,789
The Sequence of the Human Genome
Venter, J. C., Smith, H. O., & Adams, M. D. (2015) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2014.237016 · Cited by 1,665
Luan, D. D., Korman, M. H., Jakubczak, J. L., & Eickbush, T. H. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90078-5 · Cited by 1,173 · cited 2×
“L1 poly(A) tails During the process of TPRT, whereby a copy of an L1 is inserted into the genome, reverse transcription is believed to be primed on the poly(A) tail of the L1 transcript [12,14,17,27].”
BackgroundHuman L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition
Feng, Q., Moran, J. V., Kazazian, H. H., & Boeke, J. D. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81997-2 · Cited by 1,139 · cited 7×
“The functional significance of ORF1 is not clear, whereas ORF2 contains three domains critical for L1 propagation: endonuclease [12], reverse transcriptase [7,13], and a 3 ́-terminal Zn finger-like domain [14].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationHigh frequency retrotransposition in cultured mammalian cells
Moran, J. V., Holmes, S. E., Naas, T. P., DeBerardinis, R. J., Boeke, J. D., & Kazazian, H. H. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81998-4 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 10×
“The functional significance of ORF1 is not clear, whereas ORF2 contains three domains critical for L1 propagation: endonuclease [12], reverse transcriptase [7,13], and a 3 ́-terminal Zn finger-like domain [14].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationFour Evolutionary Strata on the Human X Chromosome
Lahn, B. T., & Page, D. C. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5441.964 · Cited by 1,010 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, the concentration of L1s with TSDs on the p arm of the X chromosome is lower than that on the q arm (Figure 8). Lahn and Page [ 52 ] have hypothesized that the distal p arm is the site of the youngest evolutionary strata on the X chromosome, indicating that the X and Y chromosomes actively recombined at t…”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Symer DE, Connelly C, Szak ST, Caputo EM, Cost GJ, Parmigiani G, Boeke JD: Human L1 retrotransposition is associated with genetic instability in vivo. Cell. 2002, 110: 327-338. · DOI
- Pickeral OK: Bioinformatics of human retrotransposons. PhD dissertation. Edited by: Baltimore MD. 2000, The Johns Hopkins University
- NCBI Computational Biology Branch: David Landsman's group. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Landsman/TSDfinder/]
- BLAST 2 Sequences. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/bl2seq/bl2.html]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution
Cordaux, R., & Batzer, M. A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2640 · Cited by 1,692
“Indeed, as a result of TPRT and decay over time, most L1 copies are inactivated by truncations, internal rearrangements and mutation”
Ten things you should know about transposable elements
Bourque, G., Burns, K. H., Gehring, M., Gorbunova, V., Seluanov, A., Hammell, M., Imbeault, M., Izsvák, Z., Levin, H. L., Macfarlan, T. S., et al. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1577-z · Cited by 1,430
Roles for retrotransposon insertions in human disease
Hancks, D. C., & Kazazian, H. H. (2016) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/s13100-016-0065-9 · Cited by 670
“Most LINE-1 s in the human genome are grossly truncated at their 5′-end [6, 36, 37].”
BackgroundInfluentialActive human retrotransposons: variation and disease
Hancks, D. C., & Kazazian, H. H. (2012) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2012.02.006 · Cited by 592
Human L1 element target‐primed reverse transcription in vitro
Cost, G. J., Feng, Q., Jacquier, A., & Boeke, J. D. (2002) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdf592 · Cited by 519
Self-citationTranscriptional disruption by the L1 retrotransposon and implications for mammalian transcriptomes
Han, J. S., Szak, S. T., & Boeke, J. D. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02536 · Cited by 484
“This explains, at least in part, the distribution of predominantly non-functional, 5′ truncated L1s in the genom”
BackgroundSelf-citationHuman L1 Retrotransposition Is Associated with Genetic Instability In Vivo
Symer, D. E., Connelly, C. J., Szak, S. T., Caputo, E. M., Cost, G. J., Parmigiani, G., & Boeke, J. D. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00839-5 · Cited by 479
Self-citationMobile elements and mammalian genome evolution
Deininger, P. L., Moran, J. V., Batzer, M. A., & Kazazian, H. H. (2003) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2003.10.013 · Cited by 479
“Although the relatively high incidence of these unusual rearrangements may reflect the cellular milieu of the transformed cells used for these studies, molecular and bioinformatic studies have identified rare deletion events associated with L1 and Alu insertions in humans [35–38].”
BackgroundThe complete sequence of a human Y chromosome
Rhie, A., Nurk, S., Cechova, M., Hoyt, S. J., Taylor, D. J., Altemose, N., Hook, P. W., Koren, S., Rautiainen, M., Alexandrov, I. A., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06457-y · Cited by 471
Intragenic DNA methylation alters chromatin structure and elongation efficiency in mammalian cells
Lorincz, M. C., Dickerson, D. R., Schmitt, M., & Groudine, M. T. (2004) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb840 · Cited by 472
Van Meter, M., Kashyap, M., Rezazadeh, S., Geneva, A. J., Morello, T. D., Seluanov, A., & Gorbunova, V. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6011 · Cited by 456
“Multiple reports have described the ratio of human L1s that are truncated, we used these reports as the basis for adjusting raw read depth to normalized read depth 53,54 .”
The Mobile Element Locator Tool (MELT): population-scale mobile element discovery and biologyPreprint
Gardner, E. J., Lam, V. K. L., Harris, D., Chuang, N. T., Scott, E., Pittard, W. S., Mills, R. E., & Devine, S. E. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.218032.116 · Cited by 378
“5A,B; Szak et al. 2002).”
Pace, J. K., & Feschotte, C. (2007) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.5826307 · Cited by 321
“…the evolutionary history and genomic impact of mammalian retrotransposons has been the subject of intensive investigation (for examples, see Smit et al. 1995; Kapitonov and Jurka 1996; Szak et al. 2002; Xing et al. 2003; Price et al. 2004; Khan et al. 2006; for review, see Deininger et al. 2003).”
BackgroundA Human Genome Structural Variation Sequencing Resource Reveals Insights into Mutational Mechanisms
Kidd, J. M., Graves, T., Newman, T. L., Fulton, R. S., Hayden, H. S., Malig, M., Kallicki, J., Kaul, R., Wilson, R. K., & Eichler, E. E. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.027 · Cited by 303
Yegnasubramanian, S., Haffner, M. C., Zhang, Y., Gürel, B., Cornish, T. C., Wu, Z. J., Irizarry, R. A., Morgan, J., Hicks, J. L., DeWeese, T. L., et al. (2008) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-6088 · Cited by 302
“The vast majority of LINE1 elements, however, are truncated or highly degenerate, lack the promoter sequence, and are not capable of active retrotransposition (26, 36 ).”
BackgroundDiscovering and detecting transposable elements in genome sequences
Bergman, C., & Quesneville, H. (2007) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbm048 · Cited by 268
“For example, TSDs can be used to refine the precise location of TEs, as is implemeted in TSDfinder [75] or SINEDR [76].”
MethodEndogenous retroviral promoter exaptation in human cancer
Babaian, A., & Mager, D. L. (2016) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/s13100-016-0080-x · Cited by 261
“Only ~3500-7000 are full length, retaining their promoters and hence, the potential ability to lend these promoters to nearby genes [71, 72].”
BackgroundRed: an intelligent, rapid, accurate tool for detecting repeats de-novo on the genomic scale
Girgis, H. Z. (2015) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0654-5 · Cited by 247
“A signature-based tool searches a sequence for features comprising the signature of the class of interest [21–24].”
MethodSomatic retrotransposition in human cancer revealed by whole-genome and exome sequencing
Helman, E., Lawrence, M. S., Stewart, C., Sougnez, C., Getz, G., & Meyerson, M. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.163659.113 · Cited by 240
“Known as 39- transduction, this process is thought to result from the read- through of the weak L1 poly(A) signal and is estimated to occur in 15%–23% of all genomic L1s (Holmes et al. 1994; Moran et al. 1999; Goodier et al. 2000; Pickeral et al. 2000; Szak et al. 2002 ).”
BackgroundThe non-autonomous retrotransposon SVA is trans -mobilized by the human LINE-1 protein machinery
Raiz, J., Damert, A., Chira, S., Held, U., Jung‐Klawitter, S., Hamdorf, M., Löwer, J., Strätling, W. H., Löwer, R., & Schumann, G. G. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr863 · Cited by 235
“We found variable TSDs of 8–19 bp in length which correspond well to the TSD lengths of preexisting genomic L1 insertions ranging from 9 to 27 bp (15).”
BackgroundChen, J., Stenson, P. D., Cooper, D. N., & Férec, C. (2005) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-005-1321-0 · Cited by 226
“2 in Szak et al. 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialLerat, E. (2009) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2009.165 · Cited by 228
“Programs for detecting non-LTR retrotransposons The programs TSDFINDER (Szak et al., 2002), SINEDR (Tu et al., 2004) and RTANALYZER (Lucier et al., 2007) have been designed to detect non-LTR retrotransposons.”
BackgroundProgress in understanding the biology of the human mutagen LINE-1
Babushok, D. V., & Kazazian, H. H. (2007) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.20486 · Cited by 213
“Analyses of endogenous L1s in the human genome [Jurka, 1997; Lander et al., 2001; Szak et al., 2002] further confirmed that L1 integrants carry characteristic features of TPRT integration: L1 sequences generally integrate at 50 TTTT0AA 30 sites, contain an intact 30 end region ending in a polyA,…”
BackgroundLINE-1 retrotransposons: Modulators of quantity and quality of mammalian gene expression?
Han, J. S., & Boeke, J. D. (2005) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20257 · Cited by 206
“However, protein-coding sequences are a small target (only 1% of the genome((3))) and thus most new L1 integrations are in introns or intergenic regions.((7)) The consequences of these L1 insertions on gene function have not been thoroughly studied.”
BackgroundSelf-citationSVA retrotransposons: Evolution and genetic instability
Hancks, D. C., & Kazazian, H. H. (2010) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2010.04.001 · Cited by 208
Retrotransposition of marked SVA elements by human L1s in cultured cells
Hancks, D. C., Goodier, J. L., Mandal, P. K., Cheung, L. E., & Kazazian, H. H. (2011) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddr245 · Cited by 191
“5 (full-length) AGAAAAATCTTTTCTT (16) TTCT/g 60 4 SVA.”
A mobile threat to genome stability: The impact of non-LTR retrotransposons upon the human genome
Konkel, M. K., & Batzer, M. A. (2010) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2010.03.001 · Cited by 202
“The insertion is 3′ intact (contains a polyA-tail) and is flanked by TSDs.”
BackgroundInfluential“One code to find them all”: a perl tool to conveniently parse RepeatMasker output files
Bailly‐Bechet, M., Haudry, A., & Lerat, E. (2014) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/1759-8753-5-13 · Cited by 187
“TSDFINDER was developed to refine the coordinates of long interspersed nuclear element (LINE) L1 insertions by identifying flanking target site duplication (TSD) sequences and the poly(A) tails of 3′ intact L1 insertions in the human genome [21].”
Philippe, C., Vargas-Landín, D. B., Doucet, A. J., van Essen, D., Vera‐Otarola, J., Kuciak, M., Corbin, A., Nigumann, P., & Cristofari, G. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.13926 · Cited by 186
“Consistent with previous observations (Szak et al., 2002), genic L1 copies are more often found in the antisense orientation (Figure 4—figure supplement 3a).”
Resolving rates of mutation in the brain using single-neuron genomics
Evrony, G. D., Lee, E., Park, P. J., & Walsh, C. A. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.12966 · Cited by 163
Mammalian Small Nucleolar RNAs Are Mobile Genetic Elements
Weber, M. J. (2005) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020205 · Cited by 166
“Similar compositions were reported for human L1 polyA tails [35].”
Sultana, T., van Essen, D., Siol, O., Bailly-Bechet, M., Philippe, C., Zine El Aabidine, A., Pioger, L., Nigumann, P., Saccani, S., Andrau, J.-C., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.02.036 · Cited by 154
Genomic rearrangements by LINE-1 insertion-mediated deletion in the human and chimpanzee lineages
Han, K. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki718 · Cited by 152
“As to chromosomal distribution, the majority of the L1IMDs were located on chromosomes 1–12, which probably relates to both the larger size of these chromosomes and their higher density of truncated (30 intact) L1 insertions (19).”
InfluentialGamma radiation increases endonuclease-dependent L1 retrotransposition in a cultured cell assay
Farkash, E. A. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj522 · Cited by 141
“insertions lack these features and may instead contain large deletions, cDNA transduction or 30 element truncation (13,14,24).”
BackgroundTransposable element detection from whole genome sequence data
Ewing, A. D. (2015) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/s13100-015-0055-3 · Cited by 155
“Some software tools have been developed specifically to detect TSDs [28, 29].”
TEMP: a computational method for analyzing transposable element polymorphism in populations
Zhuang, J., Wang, J., Theurkauf, W. E., & Weng, Z. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku323 · Cited by 130
“LINE elements had much longer TSDs and much broader TSD distributions compared with other retrotransposon super-families (Figure 4a), which is consistent with previous findings about the L1 element in the human genome (35,36).”
ResultLee, J. Y., Ji, Z., & Tian, B. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn540 · Cited by 125
“This bias is in good agreement with previous reports that indicated preferential placement of L1 sequences in antisense orientation of host genes with a ratio of 2 (52).”
ResultHan, J. S. (2010) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/1759-8753-1-15 · Cited by 132
“Although Figure 1 shows full-length elements, nonLTR retrotransposons in genomes are often 5' truncated due to incomplete reverse transcription [35].”
BackgroundActive retrotransposition by a synthetic L1 element in mice
An, W., Han, J. S., Wheelan, S. J., Davis, E. S., Coombes, C. E., Ye, P., Triplett, C., & Boeke, J. D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605300103 · Cited by 116
Self-citation5′-Transducing SVA retrotransposon groups spread efficiently throughout the human genomePreprint
Damert, A., Raiz, J., Horn, A. V., Löwer, J., Wang, H., Xing, J., Batzer, M. A., Löwer, R., & Schumann, G. G. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.093435.109 · Cited by 117
“…(one exception, 42 bp), a variable-length poly(A) tail of 2–72 nucleotides following putative polyadenylation signals, and a consensus target sequence AA[TTTT. Poly(A) tails were composed of patterned repeats (Szak et al. 2002) in 60 cases, while homogenous poly(A) tails were found in 56 elements.”
Heritable L1 retrotransposition in the mouse primordial germline and early embryoPreprint
Richardson, S. R., Gerdes, P., Gerhardt, D. J., Sanchez-Luque, F. J., Bodea, G. O., Muñoz-López, M., Jesuadian, J. S., Kempen, M.-J. H. C., Carreira, P. E., Jeddeloh, J. A., et al. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.219022.116 · Cited by 117
“sistent with a previously described preference of L1 for AT-rich regions (Supplemental Table 4; Szak et al. 2002; Boissinot et al. 2004; Gasior et al. 2007).”
BRCA1 and S phase DNA repair pathways restrict LINE-1 retrotransposition in human cells
Mita, P., Sun, X., Fenyö, D., Kahler, D. J., Li, D., Agmon, N., Wudzinska, A., Keegan, S., Bader, J. S., Yun, C., et al. (2020) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-020-0374-z · Cited by 113
Self-citationZingler, N., Willhoeft, U., Brose, H.-P., Schoder, V., Jahns, T., Hanschmann, K.-M. O., Morrish, T. A., Löwer, J., & Schumann, G. G. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3421505 · Cited by 111
“Only 15% of all intact L1 insertions flanked by target site duplications (TSDs) represent full-length insertions, 85% are 5 truncated, and 19% are both 5 -truncated and 5 -inverted (Szak et al. 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLINEs and SINEs of primate evolution
Konkel, M. K., Walker, J. A., & Batzer, M. A. (2010) · Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20283 · Cited by 109
L1Base: from functional annotation to prediction of active LINE-1 elements
Penzkofer, T. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki044 · Cited by 108
Processed pseudogenes acquired somatically during cancer development
Cooke, S. L., Shlien, A., Marshall, J., Pipinikas, C., Martin, S., Tubío, J. M. C., Li, Y., Menzies, A. H., Mudie, L. J., Ramakrishna, M., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4644 · Cited by 106
Mobster: accurate detection of mobile element insertions in next generation sequencing data
Thung, D. T., de Ligt, J., Vissers, L. E. L. M., Steehouwer, M., Kroon, M., de Vries, P., Slagboom, P. E., Ye, K., Veltman, J. A., & Hehir‐Kwa, J. Y. (2014) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0488-x · Cited by 110
“It has previously been observed that target site duplications and deletions tend to either be 15 nt or 9 nt in length [33], more specifically we observe that the majority of target site duplications are 14 nt in length, and target site deletions have a median of 7 nt (Figure 2B).”
BackgroundStribinskis, V., & Ramos, K. S. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-3478 · Cited by 104
Characterization of L1 retrotransposition with high-throughput dual-luciferase assays
Xie, Y., Rosser, J. M., Thompson, T. L., Boeke, J. D., & An, W. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq1076 · Cited by 98
“Since the majority of L1 insertions are 50 truncated (25,26), the length of a reporter gene could potentially be a critical factor in determining the overall L1 activity that can be observed.”
BackgroundSelf-citationJones, R. B., Garrison, K. E., Wong, J. C., Duan, E. H., Nixon, D. F., & Ostrowski, M. A. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001547 · Cited by 99
L1 integration in a transgenic mouse modelPreprint
Babushok, D. V., Ostertag, E. M., Courtney, C., Choi, J. M., & Kazazian, H. H. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.4571606 · Cited by 99
“2005), and for genomic L1s and Alus (Jurka 1997; Myers et al. 2002; Szak et al. 2002).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialKojima, K. K. (2003) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msg235 · Cited by 99
“Evolutionary dynamics in a novel L2 clade of non-LTR retrotransposons in Deuterostomia.”
BackgroundTsirigos, A., & Rigoutsos, I. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000610 · Cited by 91
“In summary, we conclude that Alu elements share little in common in terms of functional biases with either older or younger mobile elements, and we can therefore rule out the tolerance and preferential insertion hypotheses, a conclusion that is in fact consistent with previous findings [23,24].”
ResultSen, S. K., Huang, C. T., Han, K., & Batzer, M. A. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm317 · Cited by 81
“Specifically, the loci included in this analysis after experimental confirmation of the computational output possessed all four of the following characteristics: 30 truncation beyond 25 bp (i.e., 5 bp more than the minimum truncation level set during computational screening) relative to the L1HS_30end consensus from t…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialFiston-Lavier, A.-S., Barrón, M. G., Petrov, D. A., & González, J. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1250 · Cited by 73
Chen, J., Rattner, A., & Nathans, J. (2006) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddl138 · Cited by 73
A matter of life or death: How microsatellites emerge in and vanish from the human genomePreprint
Kelkar, Y., Eckert, K. A., Chiaromonte, F., & Makova, K. D. (2011) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.122937.111 · Cited by 71
“They frequently give birth to microsatellites upon and after their integration; however, unlike Alus, L1s do so evenly throughout their length, potentially because their whole sequence [and not just their 39-poly(A) tails (Boeke 1997)] is AT-rich (Szak et al. 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Specificity and Flexibility of L1 Reverse Transcription Priming at Imperfect T-Tracts
Monot, C., Kuciak, M., Viollet, S., Mir, A. A., Gabus, C., Darlix, J., & Cristofari, G. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003499 · Cited by 77
“Other studies have previously reported that T-richness extends beyond four nucleotides upstream of the cleavage site [48,50].”
BackgroundDifferent evolutionary fates of recently integrated human and chimpanzee LINE-1 retrotransposons
Lee, J., Cordaux, R., Han, K., Wang, J., Hedges, D. J., Liang, P., & Batzer, M. A. (2006) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2006.08.029 · Cited by 70
“Because L1 elements are often truncated or rearranged (Smit et al., 1995; Szak et al., 2002), we based our analyses of L1 subfamily diversity and relationships on 864 bp-long sequences encompassing the last 665 bp of ORF2 and the entire 3′ UTR, to maximize the number of elements included in the analyses.”
LINE-1 Retrotransposable Element DNA Accumulates in HIV-1-Infected Cells
Jones, R. B., Song, H., Xu, Y., Garrison, K. E., Buzdin, A. A., Anwar, N. M., Hunter, D. V., Mujib, S., Mihajlovic, V., Martin, E., et al. (2013) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.02257-13 · Cited by 69
Repetitive sequence environment distinguishes housekeeping genes
Eller, C. D., Regelson, M., Merriman, B., Nelson, S. F., Horvath, S., & Marahrens, Y. (2006) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2006.09.018 · Cited by 64
The Unusual Phylogenetic Distribution of Retrotransposons: A HypothesisPreprint
Boeke, J. D. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1392003 · Cited by 60
Self-citationThe structures of mouse and human L1 elements reflect their insertion mechanism
Martin, S. L., Li, W.-L. P., Furano, A. V., & Boissinot, S. (2005) · Cytogenetic and Genome Research · doi:10.1159/000084956 · Cited by 58
“In fact, the majority of genomic L1s are 5) truncated while the 3) ends remain relatively constant (Hutchison et al., 1989; Boissinot et al., 2001; Szak et al., 2002).”
BackgroundWolf, Z. T., Leslie, E. J., Arzi, B., Jayashankar, K., Karmi, N., Jia, Z., Rowland, D. J., Young, A. E., Safra, N., Saundra, S., et al. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004257 · Cited by 58
“LINE elements are transposable elements that comprise 21% of the human genome, 16% of the dog genome, and often insert into intronic regions [44,45].”
BackgroundA novel testis ubiquitin-binding protein gene arose by exon shuffling in hominoidsPreprint
Babushok, D. V., Ohshima, K., Ostertag, E. M., Chen, X., Wang, Y., Mandal, P. K., Okada, N., Abrams, C. S., & Kazazian, H. H. (2007) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.6252107 · Cited by 55
Bioinformatics and genomic analysis of transposable elements in eukaryotic genomes
Janicki, M., Rooke, R., & Yang, G. (2011) · Chromosome Research · doi:10.1007/s10577-011-9230-7 · Cited by 54
“With increased interest in TEs themselves, computational tools expanded in their scope, Table 1 Updated bioinformatics tools and databases since those summarized in Lerat (2009) Category Approach used Application name Defining characteristics References TE discovery programs Library-based approaches TransposonPSI Uses…”
MethodMechanisms of intron gain and loss in Drosophila
Yenerall, P. M., Krupa, B., & Zhou, L. (2011) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-364 · Cited by 53
“However, reverse transcriptase may not always reach the 5’ end of mRNA [46].”
BackgroundTransposable elements and G-quadruplexes
Kejnovský, E., Tokan, V., & Lexa, M. (2015) · Chromosome Research · doi:10.1007/s10577-015-9491-7 · Cited by 50
“In LINEs, target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT) is an inefficient process which often terminates before copying the entire element, leading to fragments truncated at their 5′ end (Szak et al. 2002; Han 2010).”
Guardian of the Human Genome: Host Defense Mechanisms against LINE-1 Retrotransposition
Ariumi, Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2016.00028 · Cited by 55
“In contrast, the E6 protein from β-human papillomavirus (β-HPV 5 and 8) reduces ATM protein levels and attenuates L1 retrotransposition, suggesting that ATM is needed for efficient L1 retrotransposition (Wallace et al., 2013).”
BackgroundThe Role of Transposable Elements of the Human Genome in Neuronal Function and Pathology
Chesnokova, E., Beletskiy, A., & Kolosov, P. M. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23105847 · Cited by 51
Transposon insertion site profiling chip (TIP-chip)
Wheelan, S. J., Scheifele, L. Z., Martínez-Murillo, F., Irizarry, R. A., & Boeke, J. D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605450103 · Cited by 47
Self-citationLi, J., Kannan, M., Trivett, A. L., Liao, H., Wu, X., Akagi, K., & Symer, D. E. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku091 · Cited by 50
“As a majority of full-length intragenic human L1s are oriented AS to flanking genes’ ORFs (23,24), resulting AS L1 RIFTs frequently include downstream spliced exons expressed in the canonical sense orientation.”
BackgroundLuca, C. D., Guadagni, F., Vallebona, P. S., Sentinelli, S., Gallucci, M., Hoffmann, A., Schumann, G. G., Spadafora, C., & Sciamanna, I. (2015) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.6767 · Cited by 44
“Only 80–100 human L1 copies are fulllength and retrotransposition-competent [3], whereas the majority of L1 insertions is truncated at their 5′ end and thus not mobile [4].”
BackgroundStructural mechanism of LINE-1 target-primed reverse transcription
Ghanim, G. E., Hu, H., Boulanger, J., & Nguyen, T. H. D. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ads8412 · Cited by 49
“The spacing observed in our assay is within the reported lengths of in vivo LINE-1 TSD events (23, 24).”
Identifying related L1 retrotransposons by analyzing 3' transduced sequences
Szak, S. T., Pickeral, O. K., Landsman, D., & Boeke, J. D. (2003) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-5-r30 · Cited by 43
“The TSDfinder program [23,37,38] was run on the RepeatMasker *.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationAn alternative pathway for Alu retrotransposition suggests a role in DNA double-strand break repair
Srikanta, D., Sen, S. K., Huang, C. T., Conlin, E. M., Rhodes, R. M., & Batzer, M. A. (2008) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.09.016 · Cited by 43
“These rates are much lower than those for TPRT-mediated insertions which encompass the vast majority of Alu insertions in primates [47].”
BackgroundLINE-1 preTa Elements in the Human Genome
Salem, A. H., Myers, J. S., Otieno, A. C., Watkins, W. S., Jorde, L. B., & Batzer, M. A. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00032-9 · Cited by 43
“A similar insertion site preference was observed for 2 kb sequence blocks as well as for the previously reported L1 Ta subfamily(24) and other L1 subfamilies.(38) In addition, we also analyzed preTa L1 elements inserted in repetitive sequences and Table 1.”
ResultProcessed pseudogenes: A substrate for evolutionary innovation
Troskie, R., Faulkner, G. J., & Cheetham, S. W. (2021) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.202100186 · Cited by 45
Determinants for DNA target structure selectivity of the human LINE-1 retrotransposon endonuclease
Repanas, K., Zingler, N., Layer, L. E., Schumann, G. G., Anastassis Perrakis, A., & Weichenrieder, O. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm516 · Cited by 44
An expanding universe of the non-coding genome in cancer biology
Xue, B., & He, L. (2014) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgu099 · Cited by 37
“The signatures of this L1 integration include 5′ truncation, shortening of oligo(dA) at the 3′ end, and target site duplications of 7–20 base pairs in length (48).”
BackgroundShephard, E. A., Chandan, P., Stevanovic-Walker, M., Edwards, M., & Phillips, I. R. (2007) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20070523 · Cited by 38
Retroposed Copies of the HMG Genes: A Window to Genome DynamicsPreprint
Strichman-Almashanu, L. Z., Bustin, M., & Landsman, D. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.893803 · Cited by 37
“Each mRNA/EST hit of 99% identity, EST match length of 300 bp, was then compared using BLAST2SEQ to the corresponding HMG mRNA and considered as evidence for RPC expression only if it was 97% identical to the HMG mRNA and therefore was not likely to be its transcript.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationMobility Pathways for Vertebrate L1, L2, CR1, and RTE Clade Retrotransposons
Ichiyanagi, K., & Okada, N. (2008) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msn061 · Cited by 36
“The lengths of the TSDs flanking the genomic copies of L1PAs (Szak et al. 2002), BovB (Nijman et al. 2002), and RTE_Mdo (Gentles et al. 2007) were analyzed previously; however, these analyses did not include TSDs of 10 bp because the short direct repeats identified could not be statistically…”
Machine learning reveals bilateral distribution of somatic L1 insertions in human neurons and glia
Zhu, X., Zhou, B., Pattni, R., Gleason, K., Tan, C., Kalinowski, A., Sloan, S. A., Fiston-Lavier, A.-S., Mariani, J., Petrov, D. A., et al. (2021) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00767-4 · Cited by 35
Automated paleontology of repetitive DNA with REANNOTATE
Pereira, V. (2008) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-614 · Cited by 35
“In such a situation RepeatMasker may annotate multiple sequence similarity hits to the given TE family without establishing the common origin of these sequences [21–24], and no information on the temporal order of insertion of overlapping repetitive elements is obtained without human analysis.”
BackgroundCharacterization of pre-insertion loci of de novo L1 insertions
Gasior, S. L., Preston, G. J., Hedges, D. J., Gilbert, N., Moran, J. V., & Deininger, P. L. (2006) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2006.08.024 · Cited by 34
“L1 and Alu are both nonsite-specific and demonstrate a strong bias for insertion into a short, A+T-rich L1 endonuclease target site, as has been demonstrated for genomic L1 and Alu insertions (Boissinot et al., 2000, 2004; Feng et al., 1996; Jurka, 1997; Jurka and Klonowski, 1996; Morrish et al., 2002; Myers et al., 2…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSantagostino, M., Khoriauli, L., Gamba, R., Bonuglia, M., Klipstein, O., Piras, F. M., Vella, F., Russo, A., Badiale, C., Mazzagatti, A., et al. (2015) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/s12863-015-0281-1 · Cited by 35
LINE-1 Hypermethylation in Serum Cell-Free DNA of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients
Dunaeva, M., Derksen, M., & Pruijn, G. J. M. (2017) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-017-0679-z · Cited by 33
“Over 500,000 copies of LINE-1 are present in the human genome, of which the vast majority is 5′ truncated [11]; about 3,000copies are full length and 80–100 of these are active re t ro t ransposons [12] .”
BackgroundKojima, K. K. (2010) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/1759-8753-1-17 · Cited by 32
“Human L1 and Alu are usually flanked by ~15-bp TSDs [9,33,34].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGladyshev, E. A., & Arkhipova, I. R. (2009) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2009.08.016 · Cited by 32
“Mammalian LINE-1 elements, which transpose by a similar mechanism, generate variable-sized TSDs, with lengths centering around 9 and 15 bp and never exceeding 60 bp in more than 16,000 analyzed L1 insertions in the human genome (Szak et al., 2002).”
BackgroundWen, X., Jeong, S., Kim, Y.-H., Bae, J. M., Cho, N., Kim, J. H., & Kang, G. H. (2017) · Clinical Epigenetics · doi:10.1186/s13148-016-0308-0 · Cited by 31
“However, 85% of LINE-1 elements are truncated in their 5′ sequences [20], and thus, PCR-based assays only assess 15% of the LINE-1 elements in the human genome.”
Transposable Element Interactions Shape the Ecology of the Deer Mouse Genome
Gozashti, L., Feschotte, C., & Hoekstra, H. E. (2023) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msad069 · Cited by 27
“…species, and even on much smaller scales, could have a catastrophic effect on the evolutionary trajectory of L1s in a genome, especially given the poor success rates of the L1 retrotransposition mechanism in producing new fully functional L1 copies (Kazazian and Moran 1998; Szak et al. 2002).”
BackgroundNovel retrotransposon analysis reveals multiple mobility pathways dictated by hostsPreprint
Ichiyanagi, K., Nakajima, R., Kajikawa, M., & Okada, N. (2006) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.5542607 · Cited by 31
“Thus, TSD enables us to determine the target-site boundaries of genomic L1 copies (Szak et al. 2002; Martin et al. 2005b; Zingler et al. 2005).”
BackgroundResultViollet, S., Monot, C., & Cristofari, G. (2014) · Mobile Genetic Elements · doi:10.4161/mge.28907 · Cited by 30
APE-type non-LTR retrotransposons: determinants involved in target site recognition
Zingler, N., Weichenrieder, O., & Schumann, G. G. (2005) · Cytogenetic and Genome Research · doi:10.1159/000084959 · Cited by 31
“This experimental evidence has been corroborated by computer analyses of the sites of preexisting L1 and Alu element insertions in the human genome (Jurka, 1997; Szak et al., 2002).”
McLaughlin, R. N., Young, J. M., Yang, L., Neme, R., Wichman, H. A., & Malik, H. S. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004531 · Cited by 32
“In various contexts, transposable elements have been shown to affect the expression of genes in their vicinity [58,59], and some elements are included in the untranslated regions of host mRNAs [60,61].”
BackgroundRusso, J., Harrington, A. W., & Steiniger, M. (2015) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.115.177196 · Cited by 29
An intronic LINE-1 regulates IFNAR1 expression in human immune cells
Buttler, C. A., Ramirez, D. M. C., Dowell, R. D., & Chuong, E. B. (2023) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/s13100-023-00308-3 · Cited by 29
“However, LINE retrotransposition is often truncated at the 5’ end [17].”
BackgroundRegulatory roles of LINE-1-encoded reverse transcriptase in cancer onset and progression
Sciamanna, I., Gualtieri, A., Piazza, P. V., & Spadafora, C. (2014) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.2504 · Cited by 29
“In the case of LINE-1, however, only a minor fraction (about 80–100) of all copies present in the human genome are full-length and retrotranspositionally competent [4], whereas the vast majority of genomic LINE-1 copies are truncated at their 5’ end and thus non-mobile [5], yet still transcriptionally competent: this…”
BackgroundHeitkam, T., & Schmidt, T. (2009) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.03923.x · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Szak, S. T., Pickeral, O. K., Makalowski, W., Boguski, M. S., Landsman, D., & Boeke, J. D.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Human Genome Sciences (United States) (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Boeke, Jef D
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2002-09-19
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- research0052-research0052
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- PMC
- PMC134481
- OpenAlex
- W2139253234
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 12.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Genome biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (CA-16519, P01CA016519)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
- Keywords
- LINE-1 retrotransposons, human genome, transposon insertion, target site duplication, poly(A) tail, structural variants
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Humans, Poly A, Recombination, Genetic, Genome, Human, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Retroelements, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review