Cited by 84Gene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksCancer Cells and Metastasis

The molecular portrait of in vitro growth by meta-analysis of gene-expression profiles

Open access
Sandberg, Rickard, Ernberg, Ingemar·2005·Genome Biology

Abstract

Background: Cell lines as model systems of tumors and tissues are essential in molecular biology, although they only approximate the properties of in vivo cells in tissues. Cell lines have been selected under in vitro conditions for a long period of time, affecting many specific cellular pathways and processes. Results: To identify the transcriptional changes caused by long term in vitro selection, we performed a gene-expression meta-analysis and compared 60 tumor cell lines (of nine tissue origins) to 135 human tissue and 176 tumor tissue samples. Using significance analysis of microarrays we demonstrated that cell lines showed statistically significant differential expression of approximately 30% of the approximately 7,000 genes investigated compared to the tissues. Most of the differences were associated with the higher proliferation rate and the disrupted tissue organization in vitro. Thus, genes involved in cell-cycle progression, macromolecule processing and turnover, and energy metabolism were upregulated in cell lines, whereas cell adhesion molecules and membrane signaling proteins were downregulated. Conclusion: Detailed molecular understanding of how cells adapt to the in vitro environment is important, as it will both increase our understanding of tissue organization and result in a refined molecular portrait of proliferation. It will further indicate when to use immortalized cell lines, or when it is necessary to instead use three-dimensional cultures, primary cell cultures or tissue biopsies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/gb-2005-6-8-r65

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genes associated with metabolism and macromolecular turnover were upregulated in monolayers, while those involved in adhesion and membrane signaling were downregulated.

    “Genes associated with metabolism and macromolecular turnover were upregulated in monolayers, while those involved in adhesion and membrane signaling were downregulated [176].”

    From Modeling Tumor Microenvironment Complexity In Vitro: Spheroids as Physiologically Relevant Tumor Models and Strategies for Their Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [176]

    The Results section reports that genes involved in energy metabolism and macromolecular processing and degradation were upregulated in cell lines, while adhesion and signaling genes were downregulated. The study compared long-term cultured cell lines with tissues and tumors; it does not specifically establish these findings for monolayers. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a meta-analysis involving NCI-60 monolayers and clinical tumor samples, approximately 30% of ~7000 genes showed altered expression.

    “In a meta-analysis involving NCI-60 monolayers and clinical tumor samples, approximately 30% of ~7000 genes showed altered expression [176].”

    From Modeling Tumor Microenvironment Complexity In Vitro: Spheroids as Physiologically Relevant Tumor Models and Strategies for Their Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [176]

    The Background reports that the meta-analysis compared NCI-60 cell lines with human normal and tumor tissues and found differential expression in approximately 30% of roughly 7,000 genes. The Materials and methods identifies the NCI-60 data, but our copy does not establish that the cell lines were grown as monolayers; that culture-specific description is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sandberg, R., & Ernberg, I.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Sandberg, Rickard
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2005-07-27
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
R65-R65
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2150864430
Cited by
84
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancerfonden
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
Keywords
cancer cell lines, in vitro selection, gene expression profiling, meta-analysis, cell proliferation, adhesion molecules, cell cycle progression, energy metabolism, tissue organization, immortalized cell lines, 3D cell culture, primary cell culture
MeSH terms
Cell Adhesion, Cell Division, Cell Line, Humans, Transcription, Genetic, Reproducibility of Results, Down-Regulation, Up-Regulation, Gene Expression Profiling, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review