Cited by 1,466Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes

Open access
Su, Andrew I., Cooke, Michael P., Ching, Keith A., Hakak, Yaron, Walker, John R., Wiltshire, Tim, Orth, Anthony P., Vega, Raquel G. +6 more·2002·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

High-throughput gene expression profiling has become an important tool for investigating transcriptional activity in a variety of biological samples. To date, the vast majority of these experiments have focused on specific biological processes and perturbations. Here, we have generated and analyzed gene expression from a set of samples spanning a broad range of biological conditions. Specifically, we profiled gene expression from 91 human and mouse samples across a diverse array of tissues, organs, and cell lines. Because these samples predominantly come from the normal physiological state in the human and mouse, this dataset represents a preliminary, but substantial, description of the normal mammalian transcriptome. We have used this dataset to illustrate methods of mining these data, and to reveal insights into molecular and physiological gene function, mechanisms of transcriptional regulation, disease etiology, and comparative genomics. Finally, to allow the scientific community to use this resource, we have built a free and publicly accessible website ( http://expression.gnf.org ) that integrates data visualization and curation of current gene annotations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.012025199

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BIN1 transcript levels are higher in human white matter than gray matter according to independent microarray analyses.

    “This finding is in agreement with the comparison of BIN1 transcript levels between the human white matter and the gray matter reported from independent microarray analyses [50, 52, 53].”

    From Predominant expression of Alzheimer’s disease-associated BIN1 in mature oligodendrocytes and localization to white matter tracts (2016) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Materials and Methods and Results and Discussion describe microarray profiling across human tissues, but the passages in our copy do not report a BIN1 comparison between human white and gray matter. Searches for BIN1, white matter, and gray matter found no passage establishing the claimed difference; page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [1]Lander E S, Linton L M, Birren B, Nusbaum C, Zody M C, Baldwin J, Devon K, Dewar K, Doyle M, FitzHugh W, et al. Nature (London) 2001;409:860–921. doi: 10.1038/35057062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Venter J C, Adams M D, Myers E W, Li P W, Mural R J, Sutton G G, Smith H O, Yandell M, Evans C A, Holt R A, et al. Science. 2001;291:1304–1351. doi: 10.1126/science.1058040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Altschul S F, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E W, Lipman D J. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Eddy S R, Mitchison G, Durbin R. J Comput Biol. 1995;2:9–23. doi: 10.1089/cmb.1995.2.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  5. [5]Burks C, Fickett J W, Goad W B, Kanehisa M, Lewitter F I, Rindone W P, Swindell C D, Tung C S, Bilofsky H S. Comput Appl Biosci. 1985;1:225–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [6]Sonnhammer E L, Eddy S R, Durbin R. Proteins. 1997;28:405–420. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(199707)28:3<405::aid-prot10>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. [7]Warrington J A, Nair A, Mahadevappa M, Tsyganskaya M. Physiol Genomics. 2000;2:143–147. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.2000.2.3.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  8. [8]Miki R, Kadota K, Bono H, Mizuno Y, Tomaru Y, Carninci P, Itoh M, Shibata K, Kawai J, Konno H, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:2199–2204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.041605498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. [9]Penn S G, Rank D R, Hanzel D K, Barker D L. Nat Genet. 2000;26:315–318. doi: 10.1038/81613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [10]Lockhart D J, Dong H, Byrne M C, Follettie M T, Gallo M V, Chee M S, Mittmann M, Wang C, Kobayashi M, Horton H, Brown E L. Nat Biotechnol. 1996;14:1675–1680. doi: 10.1038/nbt1296-1675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. [11]Wodicka L, Dong H, Mittmann M, Ho M H, Lockhart D J. Nat Biotechnol. 1997;15:1359–1367. doi: 10.1038/nbt1297-1359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. [12]Sandberg R, Yasuda R, Pankratz D G, Carter T A, Del Rio J A, Wodicka L, Mayford M, Lockhart D J, Barlow C. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:11038–11043. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.20.11038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. [13]Hughes J D, Estep P W, Tavazoie S, Church G M. J Mol Biol. 2000;296:1205–1214. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. [14]Welsh J B, Sapinoso L M, Su A I, Kern S G, Wang-Rodriguez J, Moskaluk C A, Frierson H F, Jr, Hampton G M. Cancer Res. 2001;61:5974–5978. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. [15]Nagase T, Ishikawa K, Suyama M, Kikuno R, Miyajima N, Tanaka A, Kotani H, Nomura N, Ohara O. DNA Res. 1998;5:277–286. doi: 10.1093/dnares/5.5.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [16]Sallese M, Mariggio S, Collodel G, Moretti E, Piomboni P, Baccetti B, De Blasi A. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:10188–10195. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.15.10188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [17]Rosenfeld M G, Briata P, Dasen J, Gleiberman A S, Kioussi C, Lin C, O'Connell S M, Ryan A, Szeto D P, Treier M. Recent Prog Horm Res. 2000;55:1–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. [18]McGuire A M, Hughes J D, Church G M. Genome Res. 2000;10:744–757. doi: 10.1101/gr.10.6.744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. [19]Harmer S L, Hogenesch J B, Straume M, Chang H S, Han B, Zhu T, Wang X, Kreps J A, Kay S A. Science. 2000;290:2110–2113. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5499.2110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  20. [20]Scully K M, Jacobson E M, Jepsen K, Lunyak V, Viadiu H, Carriere C, Rose D W, Hooshmand F, Aggarwal A K, Rosenfeld M G. Science. 2000;290:1127–1131. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5494.1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. [21]Mauro M J, Druker B J. Curr Opin Oncol. 2001;13:3–7. doi: 10.1097/00001622-200101000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. [22]Lin B, Ferguson C, White J T, Wang S, Vessella R, True L D, Hood L, Nelson P S. Cancer Res. 1999;59:4180–4184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. [23]Eklund L, Muona A, Lietard J, Pihlajaniemi T. Matrix Biol. 2000;19:489–500. doi: 10.1016/s0945-053x(00)00090-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. [24]Eklund L, Piuhola J, Komulainen J, Sormunen R, Ongvarrasopone C, Fassler R, Muona A, Ilves M, Ruskoaho H, Takala T E, Pihlajaniemi T. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:1194–1199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.031444798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  25. [25]Eisen M B, Spellman P T, Brown P O, Botstein D. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:14863–14868. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Su, A. I., Cooke, M. P., Ching, K. A., Hakak, Y., Walker, J. R., Wiltshire, T., Orth, A. P., Vega, R. G., Sapinoso, L. M., Moqrich, A., Patapoutian, A., Hampton, G. M., Schultz, P. G., & Hogenesch, J. B.
Affiliations
Scripps Research Institute (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2002-03-19
Volume
99
Issue
7
Pages
4465-4470
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2022756254
Cited by
1,466
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 82
FWCI
34.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
human transcriptome, mouse transcriptome, tissue-specific gene expression, transcriptional regulation, comparative genomics, gene function, etiology, genome annotation
MeSH terms
Animals, Collagen, Female, Humans, Male, Organ Specificity, Receptors, Cell Surface, Transcription, Genetic, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review