The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gold nanoparticles for cancer radiotherapy: a review
Open accessAbstract
Radiotherapy is currently used in around 50% of cancer treatments and relies on the deposition of energy directly into tumour tissue. Although it is generally effective, some of the deposited energy can adversely affect healthy tissue outside the tumour volume, especially in the case of photon radiation (gamma and X-rays). Improved radiotherapy outcomes can be achieved by employing ion beams due to the characteristic energy deposition curve which culminates in a localised, high radiation dose (in form of a Bragg peak). In addition to ion radiotherapy, novel sensitisers, such as nanoparticles, have shown to locally increase the damaging effect of both photon and ion radiation, when both are applied to the tumour area. Amongst the available nanoparticle systems, gold nanoparticles have become particularly popular due to several advantages: biocompatibility, well-established methods for synthesis in a wide range of sizes, and the possibility of coating of their surface with a large number of different molecules to provide partial control of, for example, surface charge or interaction with serum proteins. This gives a full range of options for design parameter combinations, in which the optimal choice is not always clear, partially due to a lack of understanding of many processes that take place upon irradiation of such complicated systems. In this review, we summarise the mechanisms of action of radiation therapy with photons and ions in the presence and absence of nanoparticles, as well as the influence of some of the core and coating design parameters of nanoparticles on their radiosensitisation capabilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation
Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 · Cited by 66,590
Determining the Size and Shape Dependence of Gold Nanoparticle Uptake into Mammalian Cells
Chithrani, B. D., Ghazani, A. A., & Chan, W. C. W. (2006) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl052396o · Cited by 4,879
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles
Alexis, F., Pridgen, E., Molnar, L. K., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2008) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp800051m · Cited by 3,699
Opsonization, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of polymeric nanoparticles
OWENSIII, D., & PEPPAS, N. (2006) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.10.010 · Cited by 3,637
The Effect of Nanoparticle Size, Shape, and Surface Chemistry on Biological Systems
Albanese, A., Tang, P. S., & Chan, W. C. W. (2012) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150124 · Cited by 3,633
Biomolecular coronas provide the biological identity of nanosized materials
Monopoli, M. P., Åberg, C., Salvati, A., & Dawson, K. A. (2012) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.207 · Cited by 3,017
Danhier, F., Feron, O., & Préat, V. (2010) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.08.027 · Cited by 2,800
Gold Nanoparticles Are Taken Up by Human Cells but Do Not Cause Acute Cytotoxicity
Connor, E. E., Mwamuka, J., Gole, A., Murphy, C. J., & Wyatt, M. D. (2005) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.200400093 · Cited by 2,406
Engineered Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy
Sun, T., Zhang, Y. S., Pang, B., Hyun, D. C., Yang, M., & Xia, Y. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201403036 · Cited by 2,164
Cited by
Gold Nanoparticles as Radiosensitizers in Cancer Radiotherapy
Chen, Y., Yang, J., Fu, S., & Wu, J. (2020) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s272902 · Cited by 319
Use of magnetic fields and nanoparticles to trigger drug release and improve tumor targeting
Liu, J. F., Jang, B., Issadore, D., & Tsourkas, A. (2019) · WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1002/wnan.1571 · Cited by 265
Ghahremani, F., Kefayat, A., Shahbazi-Gahrouei, D., Motaghi, H., Mehrgardi, M. A., & Haghjooy-Javanmard, S. (2018) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm-2018-0180 · Cited by 70
Injectable hydrogels as emerging drug-delivery platforms for tumor therapy
Cheng, Y., Zhang, H., Wei, H., & Yu, C.-Y. (2024) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d3bm01840g · Cited by 65
Radiosensitization of breast cancer cells using AS1411 aptamer-conjugated gold nanoparticles
Mehrnia, S. S., Hashemi, B., Mowla, S. J., Nikkhah, M., & Arbabi, A. (2021) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13014-021-01751-3 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Haume, K., Rosa, S., Grellet, S., Śmiałek, M. A., Butterworth, K. T., Solov’yov, A. V., Prise, K. M., Golding, J., & Mason, N. J.
- Venue
- Cancer Nanotechnology
- Published
- 2016-11-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8-8
- ISSN
- 1868-6958 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-6966
- OpenAlex
- W2548037115
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 130
- FWCI
- 32.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gold nanoparticles for cancer radiotherapy: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12645-016-0021-x
- The paper
- Haume, K., Rosa, S., Grellet, S., Śmiałek, M. A., Butterworth, K. T., Solov’yov, A. V., Prise, K. M., Golding, J., & Mason, N. J. (2016). Gold nanoparticles for cancer radiotherapy: a review. Cancer Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12645-016-0021-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.