Cited by 54Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Health and Care UtilizationBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

Acid tolerance properties of dental biofilms in vivo

Open access
Senneby, A, Davies, JR, Svensäter, G, Neilands, J·2017·BMC Microbiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ecological plaque hypothesis explains caries development as the result of the enrichment of acid tolerant bacteria in dental biofilms in response to prolonged periods of low pH. Acid production by an acid tolerant microflora causes demineralisation of tooth enamel and thus, individuals with a greater proportion of acid tolerant bacteria would be expected to be more prone to caries development. Biofilm acid tolerance could therefore be a possible biomarker for caries prediction. However, little is known about the stability of biofilm acid tolerance over time in vivo or the distribution throughout the oral cavity. Therefore the aim of this study was to assess intra-individual differences in biofilm acid-tolerance between different tooth surfaces and inter-individual variation as well as stability of acid tolerance over time. RESULTS: The majority of the adolescents showed low scores for biofilm acid tolerance. In 14 of 20 individuals no differences were seen between the three tooth sites examined. In the remaining six, acid-tolerance at the premolar site differed from one of the other sites. At 51 of 60 tooth sites, acid-tolerance at baseline was unchanged after 1 month. However, acid tolerance values changed over a 1-year period in 50% of the individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Biofilm acid tolerance showed short-term stability and low variation between different sites in the same individual suggesting that the acid tolerance could be a promising biological biomarker candidate for caries prediction. Further evaluation is however needed and prospective clinical trials are called for to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12866-017-1074-7

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]GHW B Johnson NM Which bacteria are cariogenic in humans? Dental caries Vol. 1: markers of high and low risk groups and individuals 1991 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 266 286
  2. [27]Mejàre I, Axelsson S, Espelid I, Dahlén G, Norlund A, Svensson Å et al. Caries – diagnosis, risk assessment and non-invasive treatment. A systematic review. Summary and Conclusions. Stockholm: The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, report no: 188; 2007. http://www.sbu.se/upload/Publikationer/Content1/1/Caries_summary_2008.pdf. (cited 12–22-16).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Senneby, A., Davies, Jr., Svensäter, G., & Neilands, J.
Affiliations
Malmö University (SE)
Corresponding author
Neilands, J
Venue
BMC Microbiology
Published
2017-07-25
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
165-165
ISSN
1471-2180 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2738579118
Cited by
54
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Borrow Fundation (1060308)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Keywords
dental plaque, acid resistance, dental caries, enamel demineralization, interindividual variability, intra-individual stability, adolescents, oral microbiota
MeSH terms
Acids, Adolescent, Bacteria, Child, Dental Plaque, Female, Humans, Male, Mouth, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Biofilms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review