Cited by 189Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

A comprehensive approach to rehabilitation interventions following breast cancer treatment - a systematic review of systematic reviews

Open access
Olsson Möller, U., Beck, I., Rydén, L., Malmström, M.·2019·BMC Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer in women worldwide. Post-treatment, patients suffer from side effects and have various rehabilitation needs, which means that individualization is fundamental for optimal rehabilitation. This systematic review (SR) of SRs aims to evaluate the current evidence on rehabilitation interventions in female patients following BC treatment. METHODS: Full-text SRs published in English from 2009 were searched in Embase, PubMed, Cinahl Complete, PsycINFO, AMED, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library. INCLUSION CRITERIA: SRs of randomized or non-randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of rehabilitation interventions in women following BC treatment. All outcomes were considered. Methodological quality was evaluated using the AMSTAR 2 tool and interrater agreement was evaluated. Out of 1269 citations retrieved, 37 SRs were included. RESULTS: Five rehabilitation areas were identified: exercise and physical activity (PA), complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), yoga, lymphoedema treatment, and psychosocial interventions. The most solid evidence was found in exercise/PA and yoga. Exercise interventions improved outcomes such as shoulder mobility, lymphoedema, pain, fatigue and quality of life (QoL). Effects of yoga were shown on QoL, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, fatigue and gastrointestinal symptoms. The effect of CAM was shown on nausea, pain, fatigue, anger and anxiety but these results need to be interpreted with caution because of low methodological quality in included studies in the SRs. Among the lymphoedema treatments, positive effects were seen for resistance training on volume reduction and muscle strength and psychosocial interventions such as cognitive behavioural therapy had positive effects on QoL, anxiety, depression and mood disturbance. CONCLUSIONS: This SR of SRs show solid positive effects of exercise/PA and yoga for women following BC treatment, and provides extended knowledge of the effects of CAM, yoga, lymphoedema treatment and psychosocial interventions. It is evident that more than one intervention could have positive effects on a specific symptom and that the effects depend not only on intervention type but also on how and when the intervention is provided. The results can be used as a foundation for individualized rehabilitation and aid health care professionals in meeting patients' individual needs and preferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ( CRD42017060912 ).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12885-019-5648-7

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]Juvet LK, Elvsaas IKO, Leivseth G, Anker G, Bertheussen GF, Falkmer U, Fors EA, Lundgren S, Oldervoll LM, Thune I et al: In., edn. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH). Copyright (c) 2009 by The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH). 2009. 29319956

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olsson Möller, U., Beck, I., Rydén, L., & Malmström, M.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Rydén, L.
Venue
BMC Cancer
Published
2019-05-20
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
472-472
ISSN
1471-2407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947113254
Cited by
189
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Högskolan Kristianstad Publikationer (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Governmental funding of clinical research within the NHS (-)
  • Percy Falks Stiftelse för Forskning Beträffande Prostata- och Bröstcancer (-)
  • The Swedish Breast Cancer Association (-)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
breast cancer, post-treatment rehabilitation, exercise and physical activity, yoga, complementary and alternative medicine, lymphedema treatment, resistance training, psychosocial interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy, quality of life, fatigue, anxiety and depression, sleep disorders, personalized rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Lymphedema, Quality of Life, Yoga, Exercise, Treatment Outcome, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review