Cited by 30Patient Satisfaction in HealthcarePsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealth Education and Validation

A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care

Open access
Pedersen, Henrik, Havnen, Audun, Brattmyr, Martin, Attkisson, C. Clifford, Lara-Cabrera, Mariela L.·2022·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Validated measures of patient-reported experiences are essential for assessing and improving the quality of mental health services and interventions. In Norwegian mental healthcare settings, the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) is increasingly being used for this purpose, but the validity and reliability of the Norwegian translation have not been investigated. Methods: We examined the factor structure and internal consistency of a digitally administrated Norwegian translation of the CSQ-8 in a sample of 338 patients recruited from outpatient treatment. The relationship between satisfaction scores and the change in symptom severity during treatment, measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-4, was also investigated. Results: The Norwegian CSQ-8 showed a clear unidimensional structure with one factor explaining 74% of the variance. Internal consistency was very high, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.95. Satisfaction showed a small-to-moderate negative relationship with change in symptom severity. Satisfaction scores were negatively skewed, and the presence of ceiling effects is discussed. Conclusion: Our results support the use of the Norwegian CSQ-8 as a valid and reliable measure of satisfaction with mental healthcare services. Further studies are needed to determine the test-retest reliability of the questionnaire, its sensitivity to change, and to assess its propensity to ceiling effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-022-04281-8

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Attkisson CC Zwick R The client satisfaction questionnaire Eval Program Plann 1982 5 3 233 7 10.1016/0149-7189(82)90074-X 10259963 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pedersen, H., Havnen, A., Brattmyr, M., Attkisson, C. C., & Lara-Cabrera, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Pedersen, Henrik
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2022-10-31
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
671-671
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307885433
Cited by
30
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Helse Midt-Norge (90822100, 90327500)
  • NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, patient satisfaction, Norwegian translation, factor structure, internal consistency, outpatient psychiatric care, PHQ-4, ceiling effect, mental health care quality
MeSH terms
Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Humans, Mental Health, Norway, Outpatients, Personal Satisfaction, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review