Cited by 20Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsSleep and Work-Related FatigueDigital Mental Health Interventions

Process evaluation of a tailored mobile health intervention aiming to reduce fatigue in airline pilots

Open access
van Drongelen, Alwin, Boot, Cécile R. L., Hlobil, Hynek, Smid, Tjabe, van der Beek, Allard J.·2016·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: MORE Energy is a mobile health intervention which aims to reduce fatigue and improve health in airline pilots. The primary objective of this process evaluation was to assess the reach, dose delivered, compliance, fidelity, barriers and facilitators, and satisfaction of the intervention. The second objective was to investigate the associations of adherence to the intervention with compliance and with participant satisfaction. Thirdly, we investigated differences between the subgroups within the target population. METHODS: The intervention consisted of a smartphone application, supported by a website. It provided advice on optimal light exposure, sleep, nutrition, and physical activity, tailored to flight and personal characteristics. The reach of the intervention was determined by comparing the intervention group participants and the airline pilots who did not participate. The dose delivered was defined as the total number of participants that was sent an instruction email. Objective compliance was measured through the Control Management System of the application. To determine the fidelity, an extensive log was kept throughout the intervention period. Subjective compliance, satisfaction, barriers, facilitators, and adherence were assessed using online questionnaires. Associations between the extent to which the participants applied the advice in daily life (adherence), compliance, and satisfaction were analysed as well. Finally, outcomes of participants of different age groups and haul types were compared. RESULTS: A total of 2222 pilots were made aware of the study. From this group, 502 pilots met the inclusion criteria and did agree to participate. The reach of the study proved to be 22 % and the dose delivered was 99 %. The included pilots were randomized into the intervention group (n = 251) or the control group (n = 251). Of the intervention group participants, 81 % consulted any advice, while 17 % did this during four weeks or more. Fidelity was 67 %. The participants rated the intervention with a 6.4 (SD 1.6). Adherence was not associated with compliance, but was associated with satisfaction (p ≤ 0.001). Pilots of 35 to 45 year old were significantly more interested in advice regarding physical activity than their colleagues, and short-haul pilots were more interested in advice regarding nutrition compared to long-haul pilots. CONCLUSIONS: The MORE Energy intervention was well received, resulting in an adequate reach and a high dose delivered. The compliance and satisfaction scores indicate that engagement and functionality should be enhanced, and the content and applicability of the advices should be improved to appeal all subgroups of the target population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Nederlands Trial Register NTR2722 . Registered 27 January 2011.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-016-3572-1

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a randomised controlled trial among airplane pilots, hypotheses on the positive effects of app use on fatigue, sleep, nutrition and physical activity were supported.

    “In a randomised controlled trial, hypotheses on the positive effects of app use on fatigue, sleep, nutrition and physical activity were supported [36, 60].”

    From Advantages and disadvantages of mobile applications for workplace health promotion: A scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Abstract (Methods and Results; page unavailable) describes a randomized study of airline pilots using an app with advice on sleep, nutrition, and physical activity. It does not report that app use improved those outcomes or fatigue; the Methods (MORE Energy intervention; page unavailable) says the effect evaluation was published elsewhere. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Drongelen, A., Boot, C. R. L., Hlobil, H., Smid, T., & van der Beek, A. J.
Affiliations
Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Corresponding author
Boot, Cécile R. L.
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2016-08-26
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
894-894
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2510653519
Cited by
20
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
VU University Medical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
pilot fatigue, airline pilots, mobile health intervention, mobile application, sleep, light exposure, nutrition, physical activity, intervention adherence, participant satisfaction, intervention fidelity, barriers and facilitators, age differences, flight time, subgroup differences, occupational health
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Pilots, Adult, Diet, Fatigue, Female, Health Education, Humans, Light, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Compliance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Work Schedule Tolerance, Exercise, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review