Cited by 457Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPhysical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Increasing Physical Activity With Mobile Devices: A Meta-Analysis

Open access
Fanning, Jason, Mullen, Sean P, McAuley, Edward·2012·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regular physical activity has established physical and mental health benefits; however, merely one quarter of the U.S. adult population meets national physical activity recommendations. In an effort to engage individuals who do not meet these guidelines, researchers have utilized popular emerging technologies, including mobile devices (ie, personal digital assistants [PDAs], mobile phones). This study is the first to synthesize current research focused on the use of mobile devices for increasing physical activity. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis of research utilizing mobile devices to influence physical activity behavior. The aims of this review were to: (1) examine the efficacy of mobile devices in the physical activity setting, (2) explore and discuss implementation of device features across studies, and (3) make recommendations for future intervention development. METHODS: We searched electronic databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, SCOPUS) and identified publications through reference lists and requests to experts in the field of mobile health. Studies were included that provided original data and aimed to influence physical activity through dissemination or collection of intervention materials with a mobile device. Data were extracted to calculate effect sizes for individual studies, as were study descriptives. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software suite. Study quality was assessed using the quality of execution portion of the Guide to Community Preventative Services data extraction form. RESULTS: Four studies were of "good" quality and seven of "fair" quality. In total, 1351 individuals participated in 11 unique studies from which 18 effects were extracted and synthesized, yielding an overall weight mean effect size of g = 0.54 (95% CI = 0.17 to 0.91, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Research utilizing mobile devices is gaining in popularity, and this study suggests that this platform is an effective means for influencing physical activity behavior. Our focus must be on the best possible use of these tools to measure and understand behavior. Therefore, theoretically grounded behavior change interventions that recognize and act on the potential of smartphone technology could provide investigators with an effective tool for increasing physical activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.2171

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • mHealth interventions have been significantly more effective than comparison conditions for physical activity (Hedge g=0.54; 95% CI 0.17, 0.91).

    “In particular, mHealth interventions have been significantly more effective than comparison conditions for physical activity (Hedge g=0.54; 95% CIs 0.17, 0.91] [9] and led to significant improvement in diabetes management (mean 0.5% reduction in HbA1c) [104].”
  • Previous syntheses either focused on a specific health issue or were constrained by small sample sizes and a lack of moderator analyses, leaving what factors account for variance in effect sizes unanswered.

    “However, previous syntheses either focused on a specific health issue [9,10] or were constrained by small sample sizes and a lack of moderator analyses [3,4], leaving what factors account for variance in ESs unanswered.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [5]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention FastStats 2011 2012-11-19 Exercise or Physical Activity Statistics http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/exercise.htm 22876391
  2. [25]Higgins JP Green S Selecting studies and collecting data Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 2008 Chichester, England Wiley-Blackwell
  3. [27]Higgins J Green S Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 2008 Chichester, England Wiley-Blackwell

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fanning, J., Mullen, S. P., & McAuley, E.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Fanning, Jason
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2012-11-21
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
e161
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994463929
Cited by
457
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 18
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (5R01AG020118-6, R01AG020118)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
physical activity, mobile devices, mobile health, smartphones, behaviour change interventions, physical activity promotion, device characteristics
MeSH terms
Humans, Motor Activity, Internet, Computers, Handheld, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review