Cited by 9Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Screening and brief intervention for alcohol use disorder risk in three middle-income countries

Open access

Abstract

Background: This study examined the prevalence of screening and brief intervention (SBI) for alcohol use disorder (AUD) risk in samples of adult drinkers in three middle-income countries (Brazil, China, South Africa), and the extent to which meeting criteria for AUD risk was associated with SBI. Methods: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from adult samples in two cities in each country in 2018. Survey measures included past-year alcohol use, the CAGE assessment for AUD risk, talking to a health care professional in the past year, alcohol use screening by a health care professional, receiving advice about drinking from a health care professional, and sociodemographic characteristics. The prevalence of SBI was determined for past-year drinkers in each country and for drinkers who had talked to a health care professional. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine whether meeting criteria for AUD risk was associated with SBI when adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics. Results: Among drinkers at risk for AUD, alcohol use screening rates ranged from 6.7% in South Africa to 14.3% in Brazil, and brief intervention rates ranged from 4.6% in South Africa to 8.2% in China. SBI rates were higher among drinkers who talked to a health care professional in the past year. In regression analyses, AUD risk was positively associated with SBI in China and South Africa, and with brief intervention in Brazil. Conclusion: Although the prevalence of SBI among drinkers at risk for AUD in Brazil, China, and South Africa appears to be low, it is encouraging that these drinkers were more likely to receive SBI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-022-14358-4

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. McKnight-Eily LR, Okoro CA, Turay K, Acero C, Hungerford D. Screening for alcohol use and brief counseling of adults—13 States and the district of Columbia. MMWR. 2020;69:265–70.
  2. Heather N. Can screening and brief intervention lead to population-level reductions in alcohol-related harm? Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2012;7:1–14. · DOI
  3. Geijer-Simpson E, McGovern R, Kaner E. Alcohol prevention and treatment: Interventions for hazardous, harmful, and dependent drinkers. The Handbook of Health Behavior Change. Springer, New York; 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826180148.0010. · DOI
  4. Aldridge A, Linford R, Bray J. Substance use outcomes of patients served by a large U.S. implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT). Addiction. 2017;112(Suppl. 2):43–53. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Neighbors CJ, Barnett NP, Rohsenow DJ, Colby SM, Monti PM. Cost-effectiveness of a motivational intervention for alcohol-involved youth in a hospital emergency department. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010;71:384–94. · DOI
  6. Wutzke SE, Shiell A, Gomel MK, Conigrave KM. Cost effectiveness of brief interventions for reducing alcohol consumption. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:863–70. · DOI
  7. Beyer FR, Campbell F, Bertholet N, Daeppen JB, Saunders JB, Pienaar ED, Muirhead CR, Kaner EFS. The Cochrane 2018 review on brief interventions in primary care for hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption: A distillation for clinicians and policy makers. Alcohol. 2019;54:417–27. · DOI · Paper page
  8. McCambridge J. Reimagining brief interventions for alcohol: Towards a paradigm fit for the twenty first century? Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021;16:1–10. · DOI
  9. Wilson GB, Lock CA, Heather N, Cassidy P, Christie MM, Kaner EF. Intervention against excessive alcohol consumption in primary health care: A survey of GPs’ attitudes and practices in England 10 years on. Alcohol. 2011;46:570–7. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Tan CH, Hungerford DW, Denny CH, McKnight-Eily LR. Screening for alcohol misuse: Practices among U.S. primary care providers. Am J Prev Med. 2018;54:173–80. · DOI
  11. Bendtsen P, Anderson P, Wojnar M, Newbury-Birch D, Müssener U, Colom J, et al. Professional’s attitudes do not influence screening and brief interventions rates for hazardous and harmful drinkers: results from ODHIN study. Alcohol. 2015;50:430–7. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Miller TR, Ringwalt CL, Grube JW, Paschall MJ, Fisher DA, Gordon MV. Design and outcome measures for the AB InBev Global Smart Drinking Goals evaluation. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019;16:1–9. · DOI
  13. Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism: The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA. 1984;252:1905–7. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Cherpitel CJ. Analysis of cut points for screening instruments for alcohol problems in the emergency room. J Stud Alcohol. 1995;56:695–700. · DOI
  15. Cherpitel CJ. Screening for alcohol problems in the U.S. general population: Comparison of the CAGE, RAPS4, and RAPS4-QF by gender, ethnicity, and service utilization. Rapid Alcohol Problems Screen Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002;26:1986–91.
  16. Dhalla S, Kopec JA. The CAGE questionnaire for alcohol misuse: a review of reliability and validty studies. Clin Invest Med. 2007;30:33–41. · DOI
  17. Raudenbush S, Bryk A, Cheong YF, Congdon R, du Toit M. HLM 8: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International; 2019.
  18. Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA, Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1789–1795. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Center for Technology and Behavioral Health. Electronic Screening and Brief Intervention (e-SBI). Center for Technology and Behavioral Health. 2022. https://www.c4tbh.org/program-review/electronic-screening-and-brief-intervention-e-sbi/ Accessed 9/28/2022.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Paschall, M. J., Ringwalt, C. L., Fisher, D. A., Grube, J. W., Achoki, T., & Miller, T. R.
Affiliations
  • Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation (US)
  • Anheuser-Busch InBev (United States) (US)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Paschall, Mallie J.
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2022-10-26
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
1967-1967
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307299856
Cited by
9
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
AB InBev Foundation (N/A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
screening and brief intervention, alcohol use disorder risk, alcohol screening, brief intervention, CAGE questionnaire, middle-income countries, Brazil, China, South Africa, alcohol use prevalence
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Crisis Intervention, Cross-Sectional Studies, Developing Countries, Humans, Mass Screening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review