Cited by 38Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Comparison of glycemic control and β-cell function in new onset T2DM patients with PCOS of metformin and saxagliptin monotherapy or combination treatment

Open access
Tao, Tao, Wu, Peihong, Wang, Yuying, Liu, Wei·2018·BMC Endocrine Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impaired insulin activity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome might differ from that seen in type 2 diabetes mellitus without polycystic ovary syndrome. This study was designed to compare the effects of treatment with metformin, saxagliptin, and their combination in newly diagnosed women with type 2 diabetes mellitus and polycystic ovary syndrome in China. METHODS: A total of 75 newly diagnosed patients from Shanghai, China with type 2 diabetes mellitus and polycystic ovary syndrome were included in this randomized, parallel, open-label study. All patients received treatment for 24 weeks with metformin, saxagliptin, or their combination. Patients were allocated to one of three treatment groups by a computer-generated code that facilitated equal patient distribution of 25 patients per group. The primary outcome was a change in glycemic control and β-cell function. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients completed the study (n = 21, for each group). The reduction in hemoglobin A1c was significant in the combination group, compared to the monotherapy groups (saxagliptin vs. combination treatment vs. metformin: - 1.1 vs. -1.3 vs. -1.1%, P = 0.016), whereas it was comparable between the metformin and saxagliptin groups (P > 0.05). Saxagliptin, metformin, and the combination treatment significantly reduced the homeostasis model assessment- insulin resistance index and increased the deposition index (P < 0.01 for all). However, no significant change was observed in the homeostasis model assessment- β-cell function among the metformin and combination groups, and no significant changes were observed in the insulinogenic index among all three groups (P > 0.05 for all). In addition, saxagliptin and metformin treatments significantly reduced body mass index and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (P < 0.01 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Saxagliptin and metformin were comparably effective in regulating weight loss, glycemic control, and β-cell function, improving lipid profiles, and reducing inflammation in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR-IPR-17011120 (retrospectively registered on 2017-04-12).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12902-018-0243-5

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tao, T., Wu, P., Wang, Y., & Liu, W.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Tao, Tao
  • Liu, Wei
Venue
BMC Endocrine Disorders
Published
2018-02-27
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
14-14
ISSN
1472-6823 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794726686
Cited by
38
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Endocrine Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81200628)
  • Chinese Medical Association Clinical Research and Special Funds - Squibb Endocrinology Diabetes Research projects (2012)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (12ZR1417800)
  • Shanghai Science and Technology Development Fund (08411953000)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome, metformin, saxagliptin, combination therapy, glycemic control, beta-cell function, insulin resistance, HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, insulinogenic index, HbA1c, body mass index, C-reactive protein, newly diagnosed diabetes, women, lipid profile, inflammation
MeSH terms
Adamantane, Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dipeptides, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Metformin, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers, Age of Onset, Glycemic Index, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review