Cited by 43Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Palliative care professionals’ willingness to perform euthanasia or physician assisted suicide

Open access
Zenz, Julia, Tryba, Michael, Zenz, Michael·2015·BMC Palliative Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide (PAS) are highly debated upon particularly in the light of medical advancement and an aging society. Little is known about the professionals' willingness to perform these practices particularly among those engaged in the field of palliative care and pain management. Thus a study was performed among those professionals. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was handed out to all participants of a palliative care congress and a pain symposium in 2013. The questionnaire consisted of 8 questions regarding end of life decisions. Proposed patient vignettes were used. RESULTS: A total of 470 eligible questionnaires were returned, 198 by physicians, 272 by nurses. The response rate was 64 %. The majority of professionals were reluctant to perform euthanasia or PAS: 5.3 % of the respondents would be willing to perform euthanasia on a patient with a terminal illness if asked to do so. The reluctance grew in case of a patient with a non-terminal illness. The respondents were more willing to perform PAS than euthanasia. Nurses were more reluctant to take action as opposed to the physicians. The majority of the respondents would attempt to treat the patient's symptoms first before considering life-ending measures. As regards any decision making process the majority would consult with a colleague. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first German study to ask about the willingness of professionals to take action as regards euthanasia and PAS without biased phrasing. As opposed to the general acceptance that is respectively high, the actual willingness to perform life-ending measures is low. The German debate on physician assisted suicide and its possible legalization should also incorporate clarifications regarding the responsibility who should eventually perform these acts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12904-015-0058-3

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zenz, J., Tryba, M., & Zenz, M.
Affiliations
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • Klinikum Kassel (DE)
Corresponding author
Zenz, Julia
Venue
BMC Palliative Care
Published
2015-11-14
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
60-60
ISSN
1472-684X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2172987278
Cited by
43
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Palliative Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dokumentenrepositorium der RUB (Ruhr University Bochum) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, palliative care professionals, nurses, physicians, end-of-life decisions, terminal illness, symptom management, Germany
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Euthanasia, Germany, Health Personnel, Humans, Palliative Care, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review