Cited by 32Palliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesHealth, Medicine and Society

A National Survey of Canadian Psychiatrists’ Attitudes toward Medical Assistance in Death

Open access
Rousseau, Skye, Turner, Sarah, Chochinov, Harvey Max, Enns, Murray W., Sareen, Jitender·2017·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Bill C-14 allows for medical assistance in dying (MAID) for patients who have intolerable physical or psychological suffering that occurs in the context of a reasonably foreseeable death. In Canada, psychiatrist support for MAID on the basis of mental illness and beliefs influencing level of support are unknown. The objectives of this research were to 1) determine if psychiatrists are supportive of MAID under certain conditions and on the basis of mental illness and 2) determine what factors are related to psychiatrist support for MAID on the basis of mental illness. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 528 psychiatrists in Canada using an online survey platform (February 19 to March 11, 2016). Results: The response rate was 20.9% ( n = 528). Most psychiatrists supported the legalisation of MAID in some circumstances (72%); however, only 29.4% supported MAID on the basis of mental illness. Factors correlating with decreased support for MAID for mental illness were the belief that MAID for mental illness would change the psychiatrists’ commitment to their patients through enduring suffering, having a personal faith, and having had past patients who would have received MAID for mental illness were it legal but instead went on to recover. Interpretation: This study found that most psychiatrists do not support the legalisation of MAID for mental illness, despite being quite supportive of MAID in general. Objections seemed to be based upon concern for vulnerable patients, personal moral objections, and concern for the effect it would have on the therapeutic alliance.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a national online survey of Canadian Psychiatric Association members, most psychiatrists supported legalizing medical assistance in dying (MAID) under certain conditions, but far fewer supported MAID on the basis of mental illness. Support for MAID for mental illness was associated with beliefs about therapeutic commitment, past patients who recovered, personal faith, and anticipated changes in response to suicidal ideation.

Key findings

  • Among 528 respondents (20.9% response rate), 71.8% supported legalization of MAID under certain conditions, while only 29.4% supported MAID on the basis of mental illness; 61.2% did not support MAID for mental illness and 9.5% were unsure.
  • Support was 23.5% for MAID for a treatment-resistant Axis 1 disorder and 9.3% for a treatment-resistant Axis 2 disorder.
  • Decreased support for MAID for mental illness was associated with belief that legalization would change psychiatrists’ commitment to patients through enduring suffering (OR 0.22; 95% CI, 0.1–0.3), having had patients who recovered but might have received MAID if available (OR 0.23; 95% CI, 0.1–0.4), and personal faith (OR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.3–0.7).
  • Belief that legalization would change psychiatrists’ response to suicidal ideation was associated with increased support (OR 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0–2.3); experience with life-threatening conditions and length of time in practice were not significantly related. Also, 46% endorsed that no psychiatric illness is irremediable to the extent MAID would be considered, and 57% reported having patients who recovered from mental illness who may have received MAID if it were available.

Methods

  • Cross-sectional online survey of all registered Canadian Psychiatric Association members (2520), with a survey link and 3 reminder emails sent February 19 to March 11, 2016; 528 psychiatrists responded (20.9% response rate).
  • The survey assessed support for MAID under certain conditions, MAID on the basis of mental illness, and MAID for treatment-resistant Axis 1 and Axis 2 disorders, plus demographics and hypothesized beliefs/experiences; ordinal responses were collapsed into yes/probably, no/probably not, and don’t know, with don’t know excluded from belief analyses.
  • Analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-squared comparisons of the sample with all CPA members for province and sex, and logistic regression for relationships between beliefs/experiences and support for MAID based on mental illness.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the nonresponse rate raises possible response bias, with psychiatrists holding particular beliefs for or against MAID for mental illness potentially overrepresented; it notes similar demographics between respondents and CPA members and similar general support patterns to the general population.
  • The paper states that the survey failed to capture psychiatrists who are not CPA members, particularly in Quebec and Ontario.
  • Evident from the text: the study is cross-sectional and based on self-reported attitudes, so causal relationships cannot be inferred; additionally, estimates for the belief that suicide can be a rational choice were unstable due to small sample size and could not be confidently reported.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0706743717711174

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 20 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Results

    57% of the sample reported having patients who recovered from a mental illness who may have received physician-assisted death if it were available at the time.

    “In addition, 46% of the sample endorsed the belief that no psychiatric illness is irremediable to the extent that physician-assisted death would be considered, and 57% of the sample reported having patients who recovered from a mental illness who may have received physician-assisted death if it were available at the time (results not shown in tables).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    Personal faith is associated with lower support for MAID for MI.

    “Personal faith No, % ( n ) 40.5 (81) Yes, % ( n ) 24.8 (61) Odds ratio (95% CI) 0.49 (0.3-0.7)**”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
      “As expected and consistently reported in the literature, there was a correlation between personal faith and decreased support for MAID on the basis of mental illness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    Psychiatrists who believed that legalisation of MAID on the basis of mental illness would change psychiatrists' response to suicidal ideation were more likely to support MAID for mental illness (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.0 to 2.3).

    “Psychiatrists who had the belief that legalisation of MAID on the basis of mental illness would change psychiatrists’ response to suicidal ideation were more likely to support MAID for mental illness (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    Psychiatrists who believed that legalisation of MAID on the basis of mental illness would change psychiatrists' commitment to their patients through enduring suffering were less likely to support MAID for mental illness (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.3).

    “Psychiatrists who had the belief that legalisation of MAID on the basis of mental illness would change psychiatrists’ commitment to their patients through their enduring suffering were less likely to support MAID for mental illness, compared to those who did not have this belief (odds ratio [OR], 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1 to 0.3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    Psychiatrists who had patients in the past who recovered from mental illness but think may have received MAID if it were available at the time were less likely to support MAID for mental illness (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.4).

    “Psychiatrists who have had patients in the past who recovered from mental illness but think may have received MAID if it were available at the time were less likely to support MAID for mental illness, compared to psychiatrists who did not have such patients (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • May combine two claims. 11
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    Support for MAID was 23.5% for treatment-resistant Axis 1 disorders.

    “Support for MAID was 23.5% for Axis 1 disorders and 9.3% for Axis 2 disorders.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § Methods

    The survey response rate was 20.9% (n = 528).

    “Responses were collected anonymously and consent was obtained (n = 528, response rate 20.9%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    Support for MAID was 9.3% for treatment-resistant Axis 2 disorders.

    “Support for MAID was 23.5% for Axis 1 disorders and 9.3% for Axis 2 disorders.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    There is little research on what motivations physicians have for their beliefs and virtually no research on Canadian psychiatrists' attitudes and motivations regarding MAID for mental illness.

    “aside from a few published surveys that do not touch on the specific issue of MAID for patients with mental illness,7,9 there is little research on what motivations physicians have for their beliefs and virtually no research on Canadian psychiatrists’ attitudes and motivations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [7] 7. Rich P. Physician perspective on end-of-life issues fully aired [Internet]. Canadian Medical Association: 2014. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: https://www.cma.ca/En/Pages/Physician-perspective-on-end-of-life-issues-fully-aired.aspx [Google Scholar]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [9] 9. Kinsella TD, Verhoef MJ. Determinants of Canadian physicians’ opinions about legalized physician-assisted suicide: a national survey. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1999;32(4):211–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Most studies show that physicians tend to be less supportive of MAID than the general population, although support may be increasing in Western countries.

    “Most studies show that physicians tend to be less supportive of MAID (or physician-assisted death as it is often referred to in other countries) than the general population, although support may be increasing in Western countries.7–9”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [7] 7. Rich P. Physician perspective on end-of-life issues fully aired [Internet]. Canadian Medical Association: 2014. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: https://www.cma.ca/En/Pages/Physician-perspective-on-end-of-life-issues-fully-aired.aspx [Google Scholar]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [8] 8. Bolt EE, Snijdewind MC, Willems DL, et al. Can physicians conceive of performing euthanasia in case of psychiatric disease, dementia or being tired of living? J Med Ethics. 2015;41(8):592–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9] 9. Kinsella TD, Verhoef MJ. Determinants of Canadian physicians’ opinions about legalized physician-assisted suicide: a national survey. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1999;32(4):211–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Bill C-14 allows medical assistance in dying (MAID) for patients who have intolerable physical or psychological suffering that occurs in the context of a reasonably foreseeable death.

    “Bill C-14 allows for medical assistance in dying (MAID) for patients who have intolerable physical or psychological suffering that occurs in the context of a reasonably foreseeable death.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] 1. Parliament of Canada. An act to amend the criminal code and to make related amendments to other acts (medical assistance in dying) [Internet]. Canada; 2016. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&DocId=8384014 [Google Scholar]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    When psychiatrists' attitudes towards physician-assisted death for mental illness have been examined, there has been considerable concern about issues of decision-making capacity and the influence of mental illness on a patient's request.

    “When psychiatrists’ attitudes towards physician-assisted death for mental illness have been examined, there has been considerable concern about issues of decision-making capacity (often referred to synonymously as “competency”) and the influence of mental illness on a patient’s request.10”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] 10. Ganzini L, Leong GB, Fenn DS, et al. Evaluation of competence to consent to assisted suicide: views of forensic psychiatrists. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(4):595–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Results

    There were no significant sex or provincial differences between the survey sample and all registered members of the CPA.

    “Chi-squared statistics for both province and sex indicated that there were no significant sex or provincial differences between the survey sample and all registered members of the CPA.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Both the Canadian Psychiatric Association and the American Psychiatric Association have produced public statements regarding MAID for patients with mental illness; the CPA raised serious concerns and the APA held that psychiatrists should not take part.

    “Both the Canadian Psychiatric Association (CPA) and the American Psychiatric Association have produced public statements regarding MAID for patients with mental illness, the former raising serious concerns and the latter holding that psychiatrists should not take part in the practice.16,17”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [16] 16. Canadian Psychiatric Association. CPA interim response to report of the special joint committee on PAD. 2016. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: http://www.cpa-apc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016-04-11-CPA-Letter-Minister-Wilson-Raybould-PAD.pdf

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [17] 17. American Psychiatric Association. Position statement on medical euthanasia. 2016. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: http://www.psychiatry.org/File%20Library/About-APA/Organization-Documents-Policies/Policies/Position-2016-Medical-Euthanasia.pdf

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Abstract

    Objections to MAID for mental illness seemed to be based upon concern for vulnerable patients, personal moral objections, and concern for the effect it would have on the therapeutic alliance.

    “Objections seemed to be based upon concern for vulnerable patients, personal moral objections, and concern for the effect it would have on the therapeutic alliance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § Discussion

    The nonresponse rate raises the possibility of response bias.

    “The nonresponse rate does raise the possibility of response bias; it is possible that psychiatrists with particular beliefs either for or against MAID for mental illness were disproportionally represented.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Discussion

    Respondents' general support for MAID and lack of support for MAID for mental illness are similar to that of the general population.

    “respondents’ general support for MAID and lack of support for MAID for mental illness are similar to that of the general population.21,22,24”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [21] 21. Angus Reid Institute. Most Canadians generally agree with euthanasia [Internet]. Angus Reid Public Opinion 2010. [cited 2012 Sep 3]. Available from: http://angusreid.org/most_canadians_generally_agree_with_euthanasia/

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] 22. Bozinoff L. Support for assisted suicide increases across four years [Internet]. Forum Research 2015. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: http://poll.forumresearch.com/post/1365/opposition-down-sharply

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] 24. Angus Reid Institute. Physician-assisted suicide: Canadians reject certain Commons committee recommendations. Angus Reid Institute: Public Interest Research [Internet] 2016. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: http://angusreid.org/assisted-suicide-law/ [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Methods

    Responses were collected anonymously and consent was obtained.

    “Responses were collected anonymously and consent was obtained (n = 528, response rate 20.9%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Conclusion

    Most psychiatrists, despite supporting MAID in general, do not support the legalisation of MAID for the mentally ill.

    “This study found that most psychiatrists, despite supporting MAID in general, do not support the legalisation of MAID for the mentally ill.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Previous studies have identified factors related to support for MAID on the basis of mental illness, including experience working with patients at the end of life and having a personal faith.

    “Although the literature is sparse, previous studies have identified factors related to support for MAID on the basis of mental illness, including experience working with patients at the end of life18 and having a personal faith.19”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [18] 18. Zenz J, Tryba M, Zenz M. Palliative care professionals’ willingness to perform euthanasia or physician assisted suicide. BMC Palliat Care. 2015;14(1):60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [19] 19. Subba SH, Khullar V, Latafat Y, et al. Doctors’ attitude towards euthanasia: a cross-sectional study experience. J Assoc Physicians India. 2016;64(6):44–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Methods

    The survey and research protocol were approved by the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board.

    “The survey and research protocol were approved by the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Conclusion

    Objections to MAID for mental illness are based on concern for vulnerable patients (particularly those with persistent suicidal ideation), the nature of the psychiatric illness not being easily qualified as 'irremediable', personal moral objections, and concern for the effect it would have on the therapeutic alliance.

    “Objections appear based on concern for vulnerable patients (particularly those with persistent suicidal ideation), the nature of the psychiatric illness not being easily qualified as “irremediable,” personal moral objections, and concern for the effect it would have on the therapeutic alliance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Abstract

    Most psychiatrists do not support the legalisation of MAID for mental illness, despite being quite supportive of MAID in general.

    “This study found that most psychiatrists do not support the legalisation of MAID for mental illness, despite being quite supportive of MAID in general.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
18 of 18
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Previous studies on psychiatrists’ attitudes towards MAID for mental illness have been exclusively in the context of concurrent terminal or debilitating physical illness, not as the sole reason for seeking MAID.

    “Previous studies on psychiatrists’ attitudes towards MAID or physician-assisted death for mental illness have been exclusively in the context of concurrent terminal or debilitating physical illness, not as the sole reason for seeking MAID.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Access to assisted death for reasons of mental illness is a legal practice in Belgium and the Netherlands.

    “Access to assisted death for reasons of mental illness is a legal practice in Belgium and the Netherlands.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The CPA membership is representative of Canadian psychiatrists.

    “A link to the survey was sent out via e-mail to all registered members of the CPA (2520)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Bill C-14 criteria essentially exclude patients who seek MAID for reasons of psychiatric illness.

    “Some have argued that these criteria, which essentially exclude patients who seek MAID for reasons of psychiatric illness, are too strict and not in keeping with the SCC decision.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Canada, only one-third support MAiD-NT for mental illnesses, with low endorsement related to the risk of changing the psychiatrists' commitment to their patients; having a personal faith; and having had patients who would have received MAiD-NT for mental illness but who recovered.

    “In Canada, only one-third support MAiD-NT for mental illnesses [47, 48], with low endorsement related to the risk of changing the psychiatrists’ commitment to their patients; having a personal faith; and having had patients who would have received MAiD-NT for mental illness but who recovered.”
  • Both spontaneous recovery and suicide deaths have been reported among patients judged eligible for euthanasia and among those approved for it.

    “Both outcomes have been reported in patients considered eligible as well as in patients approved for euthanasia (Thienpont et al., 2015;van Veen et al., 2020b;Rousseau et al., 2017;Verhofstadt et al., 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Axis 2 non-support count does not match its percentage

    Minor

    Table 3 reports 43 respondents as 82.0% of the 528-person sample, but 43 is 8.1% of 528. The reported percentage would require approximately 433 respondents.

    Reported 82 · recomputed 8.143939

  • Female respondent percentage does not match the count

    Minor

    Table 2 lists 257 female respondents out of 528, which is 48.7%, not 47.8%. The male and female counts together equal the stated sample size.

    Reported 47.8 · recomputed 48.674242

  • Practice-length categories are not five-year increments

    Minor

    The methods say length of time in practice was measured in five-year increments, but the listed categories include a 10-to-20-year interval and an open-ended more-than-20-years interval.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kinsella TD, 1999, Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can, 32, 211
  2. Charland LC, 2016, J Ethics Ment Heal, 1
  3. Subba SH, 2016, J Assoc Physicians India, 64, 44
  4. Boivin D, 2016, Health Law Can, 36, 142

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rousseau, S., Turner, S., Chochinov, H. M., Enns, M. W., & Sareen, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • CancerCare Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Sareen, Jitender
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2017-05-26
Volume
62
Issue
11
Pages
787-794
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
OpenAlex
W2618465592
Cited by
32
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Health Sciences Centre Staff Fellowship Fund Grant
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
medical assistance in dying, psychiatrists' attitudes, mental illness, Bill C-14, therapeutic relationship, vulnerable patients, moral objections, patient recovery, Canadian psychiatry
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Canada, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Physicians, Psychiatry, Suicide, Assisted, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review