A National Survey of Canadian Psychiatrists’ Attitudes toward Medical Assistance in Death
Open accessAbstract
Background: Bill C-14 allows for medical assistance in dying (MAID) for patients who have intolerable physical or psychological suffering that occurs in the context of a reasonably foreseeable death. In Canada, psychiatrist support for MAID on the basis of mental illness and beliefs influencing level of support are unknown. The objectives of this research were to 1) determine if psychiatrists are supportive of MAID under certain conditions and on the basis of mental illness and 2) determine what factors are related to psychiatrist support for MAID on the basis of mental illness. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 528 psychiatrists in Canada using an online survey platform (February 19 to March 11, 2016). Results: The response rate was 20.9% ( n = 528). Most psychiatrists supported the legalisation of MAID in some circumstances (72%); however, only 29.4% supported MAID on the basis of mental illness. Factors correlating with decreased support for MAID for mental illness were the belief that MAID for mental illness would change the psychiatrists’ commitment to their patients through enduring suffering, having a personal faith, and having had past patients who would have received MAID for mental illness were it legal but instead went on to recover. Interpretation: This study found that most psychiatrists do not support the legalisation of MAID for mental illness, despite being quite supportive of MAID in general. Objections seemed to be based upon concern for vulnerable patients, personal moral objections, and concern for the effect it would have on the therapeutic alliance.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a national online survey of Canadian Psychiatric Association members, most psychiatrists supported legalizing medical assistance in dying (MAID) under certain conditions, but far fewer supported MAID on the basis of mental illness. Support for MAID for mental illness was associated with beliefs about therapeutic commitment, past patients who recovered, personal faith, and anticipated changes in response to suicidal ideation.
Key findings
- Among 528 respondents (20.9% response rate), 71.8% supported legalization of MAID under certain conditions, while only 29.4% supported MAID on the basis of mental illness; 61.2% did not support MAID for mental illness and 9.5% were unsure.
- Support was 23.5% for MAID for a treatment-resistant Axis 1 disorder and 9.3% for a treatment-resistant Axis 2 disorder.
- Decreased support for MAID for mental illness was associated with belief that legalization would change psychiatrists’ commitment to patients through enduring suffering (OR 0.22; 95% CI, 0.1–0.3), having had patients who recovered but might have received MAID if available (OR 0.23; 95% CI, 0.1–0.4), and personal faith (OR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.3–0.7).
- Belief that legalization would change psychiatrists’ response to suicidal ideation was associated with increased support (OR 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0–2.3); experience with life-threatening conditions and length of time in practice were not significantly related. Also, 46% endorsed that no psychiatric illness is irremediable to the extent MAID would be considered, and 57% reported having patients who recovered from mental illness who may have received MAID if it were available.
Methods
- Cross-sectional online survey of all registered Canadian Psychiatric Association members (2520), with a survey link and 3 reminder emails sent February 19 to March 11, 2016; 528 psychiatrists responded (20.9% response rate).
- The survey assessed support for MAID under certain conditions, MAID on the basis of mental illness, and MAID for treatment-resistant Axis 1 and Axis 2 disorders, plus demographics and hypothesized beliefs/experiences; ordinal responses were collapsed into yes/probably, no/probably not, and don’t know, with don’t know excluded from belief analyses.
- Analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-squared comparisons of the sample with all CPA members for province and sex, and logistic regression for relationships between beliefs/experiences and support for MAID based on mental illness.
Limitations
- The paper states that the nonresponse rate raises possible response bias, with psychiatrists holding particular beliefs for or against MAID for mental illness potentially overrepresented; it notes similar demographics between respondents and CPA members and similar general support patterns to the general population.
- The paper states that the survey failed to capture psychiatrists who are not CPA members, particularly in Quebec and Ontario.
- Evident from the text: the study is cross-sectional and based on self-reported attitudes, so causal relationships cannot be inferred; additionally, estimates for the belief that suicide can be a rational choice were unstable due to small sample size and could not be confidently reported.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 20 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ Results
57% of the sample reported having patients who recovered from a mental illness who may have received physician-assisted death if it were available at the time.
“In addition, 46% of the sample endorsed the belief that no psychiatric illness is irremediable to the extent that physician-assisted death would be considered, and 57% of the sample reported having patients who recovered from a mental illness who may have received physician-assisted death if it were available at the time (results not shown in tables).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Personal faith is associated with lower support for MAID for MI.
“Personal faith No, % ( n ) 40.5 (81) Yes, % ( n ) 24.8 (61) Odds ratio (95% CI) 0.49 (0.3-0.7)**”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
“As expected and consistently reported in the literature, there was a correlation between personal faith and decreased support for MAID on the basis of mental illness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
- Findingown data§ Results
Psychiatrists who believed that legalisation of MAID on the basis of mental illness would change psychiatrists' response to suicidal ideation were more likely to support MAID for mental illness (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.0 to 2.3).
“Psychiatrists who had the belief that legalisation of MAID on the basis of mental illness would change psychiatrists’ response to suicidal ideation were more likely to support MAID for mental illness (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Psychiatrists who believed that legalisation of MAID on the basis of mental illness would change psychiatrists' commitment to their patients through enduring suffering were less likely to support MAID for mental illness (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.3).
“Psychiatrists who had the belief that legalisation of MAID on the basis of mental illness would change psychiatrists’ commitment to their patients through their enduring suffering were less likely to support MAID for mental illness, compared to those who did not have this belief (odds ratio [OR], 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1 to 0.3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Psychiatrists who had patients in the past who recovered from mental illness but think may have received MAID if it were available at the time were less likely to support MAID for mental illness (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.4).
“Psychiatrists who have had patients in the past who recovered from mental illness but think may have received MAID if it were available at the time were less likely to support MAID for mental illness, compared to psychiatrists who did not have such patients (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data§ Results
Belief that suicide can be a rational choice is associated with support for MAID for mental illness.
“who had the belief that suicide could be a rational choice reported supporting for MAID for mental illness.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
“Not surprisingly, belief that suicide can be a rational act by a competent person was strongly correlated with support of MAID on the basis of mental illness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
- Findingown data§ Discussion
29.4% of respondents were supportive of MAID on the basis of mental illness.
“In our study, only 29.4% were supportive of MAID for mental illness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
Support for MAID on the basis of mental illness is considerably less than support for MAID in general.
“Seventy-two percent of respondents were supportive of the legalisation of MAID under certain circumstances, but only 29.4% were supportive of MAID on the basis of mental illness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Only 29.4% of respondents supported MAID on the basis of mental illness.
“Table 3 shows that most respondents support legalisation of MAID under certain conditions as suggested in the Carter decision (71.8%) but only 29.4% support MAID on the basis of mental illness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Psychiatrists who reported having personal faith were less likely to support MAID for mental illness (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.3 to 0.7).
“Psychiatrists who report having personal faith were less likely to support MAID for mental illness (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Results
Belief that legalisation of MAID on the basis of MI would change psychiatrist response to persistent SI is associated with higher support for MAID for MI.
“Belief that legalisation of MAID on the basis of MI would change psychiatrist response to persistent SI No, % ( n ) 29.1 (85) Yes, % ( n ) 38.3 (59) Odds ratio (95% CI) 1.5 (1.0-2.3)*”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“A related and unexpected finding was that respondents who reported believing that legalisation of MAID for mental illness would change their approach to persistent suicidal ideation were more likely to support it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingnone given§ Results
Nearly all psychiatrists who had the belief that suicide could be a rational choice reported supporting MAID for mental illness.
“Nearly all psychiatrists who had the belief that suicide could be a rational choice reported supporting for MAID for mental illness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
9.5% of respondents were undecided about MAID for mental illness.
“9.5% were undecided”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
46% of the sample endorsed the belief that no psychiatric illness is irremediable to the extent that physician-assisted death would be considered.
“In addition, 46% of the sample endorsed the belief that no psychiatric illness is irremediable to the extent that physician-assisted death would be considered, and 57% of the sample reported having patients who recovered from a mental illness who may have received physician-assisted death if it were available at the time (results not shown in tables).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
61.2% of respondents were not supportive of MAID for mental illness.
“the 61.2% who were not supportive of MAID in our sample”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Having had patients in the past who recovered from MI but think may have received MAID if it were available at the time is associated with lower support for MAID for MI.
“Have had patients in the past who recovered from MI but think may have received MAID if it were available at the time No, % ( n ) 54.4 (74) Yes, % ( n ) 21.6 (60) Odds ratio (95% CI) 0.23 (0.1-0.4)**”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
“reporting having had a patient in the past who would have received MAID were it available but went on to recover from their mental illness”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
- Findingown data§ Results
Belief that legalisation of MAID on the basis of MI would challenge psychiatrists' commitment to endure with their patients through their suffering is associated with lower support for MAID for MI.
“Belief that legalisation of MAID on the basis of MI would challenge psychiatrists’ commitment to endure with their patients through their suffering No, % ( n ) 53.4 (78) Yes, % ( n ) 19.8 (58) Odds ratio (95% CI) 0.22 (0.1-0.3)**”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Respondents who believed that legalising MAID for mental illness would challenge psychiatrists’ commitment to endure through their patients’ suffering were unlikely to show support for MAID for mental illness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data§ Results
Experience working with people with life-threatening conditions is not significantly related to support for MAID for mental illness.
“Experience working with people with life-threatening conditions and length of time in practice did not have a significant relationship with support for MAID for mental illness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
72% of respondents were supportive of the legalisation of MAID under certain circumstances.
“Respondents to our survey showed substantial support (71.8%) for MAID under certain circumstances”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
Half of respondents did not think any psychiatric illness could be considered 'irremediable' in the sense that MAID would be justifiable.
“Half of respondents did not think any psychiatric illness could be considered “irremediable” in the sense that MAID would be justifiable”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Length of time in practice is not significantly related to support for MAID for mental illness.
“Experience working with people with life-threatening conditions and length of time in practice did not have a significant relationship with support for MAID for mental illness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
57% of respondents reported having treated patients who they believe would have received MAID were it legal for mental illness but instead went on to recover.
“57% reported having treated patients who they believe would have received MAID were it legal for mental illness but instead went on to recover.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion
There was substantial variation among respondents in what might be considered 'irremediable'.
“Amongst our respondents, there was substantial variation in what was might be considered “irremediable.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results
Most respondents supported legalisation of MAID under certain conditions as suggested in the Carter decision (71.8%).
“Table 3 shows that most respondents support legalisation of MAID under certain conditions as suggested in the Carter decision (71.8%) but only 29.4% support MAID on the basis of mental illness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Abstract
An Alberta court of appeal decision predating Bill C-14 ruled that criteria laid out in the Carter decision do not exclude psychiatric illness.
“Notably, an Alberta court of appeal decision, which predates Bill C-14, ruled that criteria laid out in the Carter decision do not exclude psychiatric illness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] 5. Canada (Attorney General) v E.F., 2016 ABCA 155 (CanLII) [Internet; cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: http://canlii.ca/t/grqkg
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Abstract
The few studies considering physician-assisted death on the basis of mental illness have found significantly less support among physicians than in general.
“The few studies considering physician-assisted death on the basis of mental illness have found significantly less support among physicians than in general.8,10”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [8] 8. Bolt EE, Snijdewind MC, Willems DL, et al. Can physicians conceive of performing euthanasia in case of psychiatric disease, dementia or being tired of living? J Med Ethics. 2015;41(8):592–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] 10. Ganzini L, Leong GB, Fenn DS, et al. Evaluation of competence to consent to assisted suicide: views of forensic psychiatrists. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(4):595–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Discussion
When chronically ill patients are followed over longer time periods and given a good standard of care, there is evidence of substantial rates of improvement in treatment-resistant depression.
“This is true of both treatment-resistant depression25 and borderline personality disorder,26”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] 25. Fekadu A, Rane LJ, Wooderson SC, et al. Prediction of longer-term outcome of treatment-resistant depression in tertiary care. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;201(5):369–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ Discussion
Psychiatrists in general are more supportive of MAID than the general physician population in Canada.
“Respondents to our survey showed substantial support (71.8%) for MAID under certain circumstances, suggesting that psychiatrists in general are more supportive of MAID than the general physician population in Canada.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“who in the most recent survey done by the Canadian Medical Association were 44.8% in favour of legalising MAID.7”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] 7. Rich P. Physician perspective on end-of-life issues fully aired [Internet]. Canadian Medical Association: 2014. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: https://www.cma.ca/En/Pages/Physician-perspective-on-end-of-life-issues-fully-aired.aspx [Google Scholar]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Interpretationown data§ Results
The survey sample was representative of all CPA members.
“This demonstrates that our sample was representative of all CPA members.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data§ Results
Due to small sample size, estimates for the relationship between the belief that suicide can be a rational choice and support for MAID for mental illness were unstable and could not be confidently reported.
“Due to small sample size, the estimates for the relationship between the belief that suicide can be a rational choice and support for MAID for mental illness were unstable and could not be confidently reported.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Discussion
Psychiatrists have significant reservations about MAID for the mentally ill.
“Our study suggests that psychiatrists have significant reservations about MAID for the mentally ill.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given§ Discussion
The study failed to capture many psychiatrists, particularly in Quebec but also in Ontario, who are not members of the CPA.
“Another limitation is the failure to capture the many psychiatrists, particularly in Quebec but also in Ontario, who are not members of the CPA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Discussion
When chronically ill patients are followed over longer time periods and given a good standard of care, there is evidence of substantial rates of improvement in borderline personality disorder.
“This is true of both treatment-resistant depression25 and borderline personality disorder,26”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] 26. Biskin RS. The lifetime course of borderline personality disorder. Can J Psychiatry. 2015;60(7):303–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Articles from Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given§ Discussion
There are very similar demographics between the study sample and the general pool of CPA members.
“However, there are very similar demographics between the study sample and the general pool of CPA members”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
- May combine two claims. 11
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ ResultsSupport for MAID was 23.5% for treatment-resistant Axis 1 disorders.
“Support for MAID was 23.5% for Axis 1 disorders and 9.3% for Axis 2 disorders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ MethodsThe survey response rate was 20.9% (n = 528).
“Responses were collected anonymously and consent was obtained (n = 528, response rate 20.9%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ ResultsSupport for MAID was 9.3% for treatment-resistant Axis 2 disorders.
“Support for MAID was 23.5% for Axis 1 disorders and 9.3% for Axis 2 disorders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ AbstractThere is little research on what motivations physicians have for their beliefs and virtually no research on Canadian psychiatrists' attitudes and motivations regarding MAID for mental illness.
“aside from a few published surveys that do not touch on the specific issue of MAID for patients with mental illness,7,9 there is little research on what motivations physicians have for their beliefs and virtually no research on Canadian psychiatrists’ attitudes and motivations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [7] 7. Rich P. Physician perspective on end-of-life issues fully aired [Internet]. Canadian Medical Association: 2014. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: https://www.cma.ca/En/Pages/Physician-perspective-on-end-of-life-issues-fully-aired.aspx [Google Scholar]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [9] 9. Kinsella TD, Verhoef MJ. Determinants of Canadian physicians’ opinions about legalized physician-assisted suicide: a national survey. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1999;32(4):211–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ AbstractMost studies show that physicians tend to be less supportive of MAID than the general population, although support may be increasing in Western countries.
“Most studies show that physicians tend to be less supportive of MAID (or physician-assisted death as it is often referred to in other countries) than the general population, although support may be increasing in Western countries.7–9”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] 7. Rich P. Physician perspective on end-of-life issues fully aired [Internet]. Canadian Medical Association: 2014. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: https://www.cma.ca/En/Pages/Physician-perspective-on-end-of-life-issues-fully-aired.aspx [Google Scholar]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [8] 8. Bolt EE, Snijdewind MC, Willems DL, et al. Can physicians conceive of performing euthanasia in case of psychiatric disease, dementia or being tired of living? J Med Ethics. 2015;41(8):592–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] 9. Kinsella TD, Verhoef MJ. Determinants of Canadian physicians’ opinions about legalized physician-assisted suicide: a national survey. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1999;32(4):211–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ AbstractBill C-14 allows medical assistance in dying (MAID) for patients who have intolerable physical or psychological suffering that occurs in the context of a reasonably foreseeable death.
“Bill C-14 allows for medical assistance in dying (MAID) for patients who have intolerable physical or psychological suffering that occurs in the context of a reasonably foreseeable death.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] 1. Parliament of Canada. An act to amend the criminal code and to make related amendments to other acts (medical assistance in dying) [Internet]. Canada; 2016. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&DocId=8384014 [Google Scholar]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ AbstractWhen psychiatrists' attitudes towards physician-assisted death for mental illness have been examined, there has been considerable concern about issues of decision-making capacity and the influence of mental illness on a patient's request.
“When psychiatrists’ attitudes towards physician-assisted death for mental illness have been examined, there has been considerable concern about issues of decision-making capacity (often referred to synonymously as “competency”) and the influence of mental illness on a patient’s request.10”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] 10. Ganzini L, Leong GB, Fenn DS, et al. Evaluation of competence to consent to assisted suicide: views of forensic psychiatrists. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(4):595–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ ResultsThere were no significant sex or provincial differences between the survey sample and all registered members of the CPA.
“Chi-squared statistics for both province and sex indicated that there were no significant sex or provincial differences between the survey sample and all registered members of the CPA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ AbstractBoth the Canadian Psychiatric Association and the American Psychiatric Association have produced public statements regarding MAID for patients with mental illness; the CPA raised serious concerns and the APA held that psychiatrists should not take part.
“Both the Canadian Psychiatric Association (CPA) and the American Psychiatric Association have produced public statements regarding MAID for patients with mental illness, the former raising serious concerns and the latter holding that psychiatrists should not take part in the practice.16,17”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] 16. Canadian Psychiatric Association. CPA interim response to report of the special joint committee on PAD. 2016. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: http://www.cpa-apc.org/wp-content/uploads/2016-04-11-CPA-Letter-Minister-Wilson-Raybould-PAD.pdf
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] 17. American Psychiatric Association. Position statement on medical euthanasia. 2016. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: http://www.psychiatry.org/File%20Library/About-APA/Organization-Documents-Policies/Policies/Position-2016-Medical-Euthanasia.pdf
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ AbstractObjections to MAID for mental illness seemed to be based upon concern for vulnerable patients, personal moral objections, and concern for the effect it would have on the therapeutic alliance.
“Objections seemed to be based upon concern for vulnerable patients, personal moral objections, and concern for the effect it would have on the therapeutic alliance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoning§ DiscussionThe nonresponse rate raises the possibility of response bias.
“The nonresponse rate does raise the possibility of response bias; it is possible that psychiatrists with particular beliefs either for or against MAID for mental illness were disproportionally represented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitation§ DiscussionRespondents' general support for MAID and lack of support for MAID for mental illness are similar to that of the general population.
“respondents’ general support for MAID and lack of support for MAID for mental illness are similar to that of the general population.21,22,24”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [21] 21. Angus Reid Institute. Most Canadians generally agree with euthanasia [Internet]. Angus Reid Public Opinion 2010. [cited 2012 Sep 3]. Available from: http://angusreid.org/most_canadians_generally_agree_with_euthanasia/
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [22] 22. Bozinoff L. Support for assisted suicide increases across four years [Internet]. Forum Research 2015. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: http://poll.forumresearch.com/post/1365/opposition-down-sharply
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] 24. Angus Reid Institute. Physician-assisted suicide: Canadians reject certain Commons committee recommendations. Angus Reid Institute: Public Interest Research [Internet] 2016. [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available from: http://angusreid.org/assisted-suicide-law/ [Google Scholar]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ MethodsResponses were collected anonymously and consent was obtained.
“Responses were collected anonymously and consent was obtained (n = 528, response rate 20.9%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ ConclusionMost psychiatrists, despite supporting MAID in general, do not support the legalisation of MAID for the mentally ill.
“This study found that most psychiatrists, despite supporting MAID in general, do not support the legalisation of MAID for the mentally ill.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ AbstractPrevious studies have identified factors related to support for MAID on the basis of mental illness, including experience working with patients at the end of life and having a personal faith.
“Although the literature is sparse, previous studies have identified factors related to support for MAID on the basis of mental illness, including experience working with patients at the end of life18 and having a personal faith.19”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [18] 18. Zenz J, Tryba M, Zenz M. Palliative care professionals’ willingness to perform euthanasia or physician assisted suicide. BMC Palliat Care. 2015;14(1):60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] 19. Subba SH, Khullar V, Latafat Y, et al. Doctors’ attitude towards euthanasia: a cross-sectional study experience. J Assoc Physicians India. 2016;64(6):44–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone given§ MethodsThe survey and research protocol were approved by the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board.
“The survey and research protocol were approved by the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ ConclusionObjections to MAID for mental illness are based on concern for vulnerable patients (particularly those with persistent suicidal ideation), the nature of the psychiatric illness not being easily qualified as 'irremediable', personal moral objections, and concern for the effect it would have on the therapeutic alliance.
“Objections appear based on concern for vulnerable patients (particularly those with persistent suicidal ideation), the nature of the psychiatric illness not being easily qualified as “irremediable,” personal moral objections, and concern for the effect it would have on the therapeutic alliance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ AbstractMost psychiatrists do not support the legalisation of MAID for mental illness, despite being quite supportive of MAID in general.
“This study found that most psychiatrists do not support the legalisation of MAID for mental illness, despite being quite supportive of MAID in general.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Previous studies on psychiatrists’ attitudes towards MAID for mental illness have been exclusively in the context of concurrent terminal or debilitating physical illness, not as the sole reason for seeking MAID.
“Previous studies on psychiatrists’ attitudes towards MAID or physician-assisted death for mental illness have been exclusively in the context of concurrent terminal or debilitating physical illness, not as the sole reason for seeking MAID.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Access to assisted death for reasons of mental illness is a legal practice in Belgium and the Netherlands.
“Access to assisted death for reasons of mental illness is a legal practice in Belgium and the Netherlands.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The CPA membership is representative of Canadian psychiatrists.
“A link to the survey was sent out via e-mail to all registered members of the CPA (2520)”
The paper relies on this without support.
Bill C-14 criteria essentially exclude patients who seek MAID for reasons of psychiatric illness.
“Some have argued that these criteria, which essentially exclude patients who seek MAID for reasons of psychiatric illness, are too strict and not in keeping with the SCC decision.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Canada, only one-third support MAiD-NT for mental illnesses, with low endorsement related to the risk of changing the psychiatrists' commitment to their patients; having a personal faith; and having had patients who would have received MAiD-NT for mental illness but who recovered.
“In Canada, only one-third support MAiD-NT for mental illnesses [47, 48], with low endorsement related to the risk of changing the psychiatrists’ commitment to their patients; having a personal faith; and having had patients who would have received MAiD-NT for mental illness but who recovered.”
From Debating Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Death in People with Psychiatric Disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [48]
Both spontaneous recovery and suicide deaths have been reported among patients judged eligible for euthanasia and among those approved for it.
“Both outcomes have been reported in patients considered eligible as well as in patients approved for euthanasia (Thienpont et al., 2015;van Veen et al., 2020b;Rousseau et al., 2017;Verhofstadt et al., 2021).”
From Why adults with psychiatric conditions request euthanasia: A qualitative interview study of life experiences, motives and preventive factors (2021) · cites this paper as Rousseau et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Axis 2 non-support count does not match its percentage
MinorTable 3 reports 43 respondents as 82.0% of the 528-person sample, but 43 is 8.1% of 528. The reported percentage would require approximately 433 respondents.
Reported 82 · recomputed 8.143939
“Support for MAID for a treatment-resistant Axis 2 disorder Support 9.3 (49) Do not support 82.0 (43) Don’t know 8.7 (46)”
Female respondent percentage does not match the count
MinorTable 2 lists 257 female respondents out of 528, which is 48.7%, not 47.8%. The male and female counts together equal the stated sample size.
Reported 47.8 · recomputed 48.674242
“Characteristic Study Sample ( n = 528), % ( n ) All CPA Members ( N = 2520), % ( n ) Province”
Practice-length categories are not five-year increments
MinorThe methods say length of time in practice was measured in five-year increments, but the listed categories include a 10-to-20-year interval and an open-ended more-than-20-years interval.
“Length of time in practice was measured in 5-year increments, with a final category of retired.”
“Length of time in practice included the following categories: resident, less than 5 years, 5 to 10 years, 10 to 20 years, more than 20 years, and retired.”
Cites
Kim, S. Y. H., De Vries, R. G., & Peteet, J. R. (2016) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2887 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Thienpont, L., Verhofstadt, M., Van Loon, T., Distelmans, W., Audenaert, K., & De Deyn, P. P. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007454 · Cited by 231 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Although the quite distinct development of this practice in the unique medical cultures of these countries may complicate comparisons, recently several retrospective descriptive reviews have examined outcome measures for patients receiving assisted death for reasons of mental illness.(12,13) The unexpected variety of…”
BackgroundInfluentialBolt, E. E., Snijdewind, M. C., Willems, D. L., van der Heide, A., & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. (2015) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102150 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
The Lifetime Course of Borderline Personality Disorder
Biskin, R. S. (2015) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371506000702 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Physician-assisted death in psychiatric practice in The Netherlands
Groenewoud, J. H., van der Maas, P. J., van der Wal, G., Hengeveld, M. W., Tholen, A. J., Schudel, W. J., & van der Heide, A. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199706193362506 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Capacity evaluations of psychiatric patients requesting assisted death in The Netherlands
Doernberg, S. N., Peteet, J. R., & Kim, S. Y. H. (2016) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/j.psym.2016.06.005 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Physician-Assisted Death for Patients With Mental Disorders—Reasons for Concern
Appelbaum, P. S. (2016) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2890 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Prediction of longer-term outcome of treatment-resistant depression in tertiary care
Fekadu, A., Rane, L. J., Wooderson, S. C., Markopoulou, K., Poon, L., & Cleare, A. J. (2012) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.111.102665 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Evaluation of Competence to Consent to Assisted Suicide:Views of Forensic Psychiatrists
Ganzini, L., Leong, G. B., Fenn, D. S., Silva, J. A., & Weinstock, R. (2000) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.157.4.595 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Palliative care professionals’ willingness to perform euthanasia or physician assisted suicide
Zenz, J., Tryba, M., & Zenz, M. (2015) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-015-0058-3 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Doctors' Attitude Towards Euthanasia: A Cross-sectional Study Experience.
Subba, S. H., Khullar, V., Latafat, Y., et al. (2016) · PubMed · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Td, K., & Verhoef, M. J. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Quebec's Medical Aid in Dying: An Inspiration for Other Canadian Jurisdictions?
Boivin, D., & Barrette, J. (2016) · PubMed · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Kinsella TD, 1999, Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can, 32, 211
- Charland LC, 2016, J Ethics Ment Heal, 1
- Subba SH, 2016, J Assoc Physicians India, 64, 44
- Boivin D, 2016, Health Law Can, 36, 142
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nicolini, M. E., Kim, S. Y. H., Churchill, M. E., & Gastmans, C. (2020) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720001543 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Debating Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Death in People with Psychiatric Disorders
Grassi, L., Folesani, F., Marella, M., Tiberto, E., Riba, M. B., Bortolotti, L., Toffanin, T., Palagini, L., Belvederi Murri, M., Biancosino, B., et al. (2022) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-022-01339-y · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Medical Assistance in Dying and Mental Health: A Legal, Ethical, and Clinical Analysis
Simpson, A. I. F. (2018) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0706743717746662 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Verhofstadt, M., Pardon, K., Audenaert, K., Deliens, L., Mortier, F., Liégeois, A., & Chambaere, K. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.032 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Crumley, E. T., Kelly, S., Young, J., Phinney, N., McCarthy, J., & Gubitz, G. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048698 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Verhofstadt, M., Audenaert, K., Van den Broeck, K., Deliens, L., Mortier, F., Titeca, K., Pardon, K., & Chambaere, K. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02775-x · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Hodel, M. A., Hoff, P., Irwin, S. A., Biller-Andorno, N., Riese, F., & Trachsel, M. (2019) · Palliative and Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951519000233 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Stergiopoulos, V., Bastidas-Bilbao, H., Gupta, M., Buchman, D. Z., Stewart, D. E., Rajji, T., Simpson, A. I. F., van Kesteren, M. R., Cappe, V., Castle, D., et al. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-024-05541-5 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rousseau, S., Turner, S., Chochinov, H. M., Enns, M. W., & Sareen, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- CancerCare Manitoba (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Sareen, Jitender
- Venue
- The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-05-26
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 787-794
- ISSN
- 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
- 1497-0015
- PMC
- PMC5697624
- OpenAlex
- W2618465592
- Semantic Scholar
- 2d6bbd48959ebba4505490155bd5d768a99f4ab8
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Health Sciences Centre Staff Fellowship Fund Grant
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Keywords
- medical assistance in dying, psychiatrists' attitudes, mental illness, Bill C-14, therapeutic relationship, vulnerable patients, moral objections, patient recovery, Canadian psychiatry
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Canada, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Physicians, Psychiatry, Suicide, Assisted, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review