Cited by 133Palliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Legalizing euthanasia or assisted suicide: the illusion of safeguards and controls

Open access
Pereira, José·2011·Current Oncology

Abstract

Euthanasia or assisted suicide-and sometimes both-have been legalized in a small number of countries and states. In all jurisdictions, laws and safeguards were put in place to prevent abuse and misuse of these practices. Prevention measures have included, among others, explicit consent by the person requesting euthanasia, mandatory reporting of all cases, administration only by physicians (with the exception of Switzerland), and consultation by a second physician.The present paper provides evidence that these laws and safeguards are regularly ignored and transgressed in all the jurisdictions and that transgressions are not prosecuted. For example, about 900 people annually are administered lethal substances without having given explicit consent, and in one jurisdiction, almost 50% of cases of euthanasia are not reported. Increased tolerance of transgressions in societies with such laws represents a social "slippery slope," as do changes to the laws and criteria that followed legalization. Although the initial intent was to limit euthanasia and assisted suicide to a last-resort option for a very small number of terminally ill people, some jurisdictions now extend the practice to newborns, children, and people with dementia. A terminal illness is no longer a prerequisite. In the Netherlands, euthanasia for anyone over the age of 70 who is "tired of living" is now being considered. Legalizing euthanasia and assisted suicide therefore places many people at risk, affects the values of society over time, and does not provide controls and safeguards.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3747/co.v18i2.883

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a risk that practices are prone to abuse, and that there is a 'slippery slope' of ever more permissive practices that will fail to protect those who are most in need of protection.

    “There is a risk that practices are prone to abuse, and that there is a “slippery slope” of ever more permissive practices that will fail to protect those who are most in need of protection (15).”

    From Medical Assistance in Dying: Challenges for Psychiatry (2018) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Watson R. Luxembourg is to allow euthanasia. BMJ 2009;338:b1248.
  2. Euthanasia [letter]. Lancet 1991;338:1150.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pereira, J.
Affiliations
University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Pereira, José
Venue
Current Oncology
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2011-04-01
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
38-45
ISSN
  • 1198-0052 (ISSN-L)
  • 1718-7729
OpenAlex
W2124168868
Cited by
133
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
euthanasia, assisted suicide, legalization of euthanasia, informed consent, mandatory reporting, slippery slope, Dutch euthanasia law, social values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review