Cited by 100Empathy and Medical EducationInnovations in Medical EducationPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Compassion training in healthcare: what are patients’ perspectives on training healthcare providers?

Open access
Sinclair, Shane, Torres, Mia-Bernadine, Raffin-Bouchal, Shelley, Hack, Thomas F., McClement, Susan, Hagen, Neil A., Chochinov, Harvey M.·2016·BMC Medical Education

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this qualitative study was to investigate advanced cancer patients' perspectives on the importance, feasibility, teaching methods, and issues associated with training healthcare providers in compassionate care. METHODS: This study utilized grounded theory, a qualitative research method, to develop an empirical understanding of compassion education rooted in direct patient reports. Audio-recorded semi-structured interviews were conducted to obtain an in-depth understanding of compassion training from the perspectives of hospitalized advanced cancer patients (n = 53). Data were analyzed in accordance with grounded theory to determine the key elements of the underlying theory. RESULTS: Three overarching categories and associated themes emerged from the data: compassion aptitude, cultivating compassion, and training methods. Participants spoke of compassion as an innate quality embedded in the character of learners prior to their healthcare training, which could be nurtured through experiential learning and reflective practices. Patients felt that the innate qualities that learners possessed at baseline were further fashioned by personal and practice experiences, and vocational motivators. Participants also provided recommendations for compassion training, including developing an interpersonal relationship with patients, seeing the patient as a person, and developing a human connection. Teaching methods that patients suggested in compassion training included patient-centered communication, self-reflection exercises, and compassionate role modeling. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insight on compassion training for both current and future healthcare providers, from the perspectives of the end recipients of healthcare provider training - patients. Developing a theoretical base for patient centred, evidence-informed, compassion training is a crucial initial step toward the further development of this core healthcare competency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12909-016-0695-0

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]Willis L Raising the Bar: The Shape of Caring Review 2015 London Health Education England
  2. [42]Chenitz C Swanson JM From practice to grounded theory: Qual Res Nurs 1986 Menlo Park Addison-Wesley

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sinclair, S., Torres, M.-B., Raffin-Bouchal, S., Hack, T. F., McClement, S., Hagen, N. A., & Chochinov, H. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Sinclair, Shane
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Published
2016-07-11
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
169-169
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2460551072
Cited by
100
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Mspace (University of Manitoba) (submittedVersion)
  • Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (125931)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
compassion training, compassionate care, advanced cancer patients, patient perspectives, health professions education, experiential learning, reflective practice, patient-centered communication, end-of-life care
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Empathy, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Inpatients, Interpersonal Relations, Interviews as Topic, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Patient Satisfaction, Patient-Centered Care, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review