Cited by 38Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutEmpathy and Medical Education

A compassion-based program to reduce psychological distress in medical students: A pilot randomized clinical trial

Open access
Rojas, Blanca, Catalan, Elena, Diez, Gustavo, Roca, Pablo·2023·PLOS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Physicians and medical students are subject to higher levels of psychological distress than the general population. These challenges have a negative impact in medical practice, leading to uncompassionate care. This pilot study aims to examine the feasibility of Compassion Cultivation Training (CCT) to reduce psychological distress and improve the well-being of medical students. We hypothesize that the CCT program, as compared to a waitlist control group, will reduce psychological distress (i.e., stress, anxiety, and depression) and burnout symptoms, while improving compassion, empathy, mindfulness, resilience, psychological well-being, and emotion-regulation strategies after the intervention. Furthermore, we hypothesize that these improvements will be maintained at a two-month follow-up. METHODS: Medical students were randomly assigned to an 8-week CCT or a Waitlist control group (WL). They completed self-report assessments at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and a 2-month follow-up. The outcomes measured were compassion, empathy, mindfulness, well-being, resilience, emotional regulation, psychological distress, burnout, and COVID-19 concern. Mixed-effects models and Reliable Change Index were computed. RESULTS: Compared with WL, CCT showed significant improvements in self-compassion, mindfulness, and emotion regulation, as well as a significant decrease in stress, anxiety, and emotional exhaustion component of burnout. Furthermore, some of these effects persisted at follow-up. No adverse effects of meditation practices were found. CONCLUSIONS: CCT enhanced compassion skills while reducing psychological distress in medical students, this being critical to preserving the mental health of physicians while promoting compassionate care for patients. The need for institutions to include this type of training is also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0287388

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three blended group studies reported an effect on stress, burnout, and depression and anxiety through the use of the Transition and Adaptation towards Resiliency module, the ThoughFullChat intervention, and the Compassion Cultivating Training.

    “Three studies (79–81) reported an effect on stress (79, 81), burnout (79), and depression and anxiety (79, 80) through the Use of the Transition and Adaptation towards Resiliency module, the ThoughFullChat intervention, and the Compassion Cultivating Training.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [60]Waibel AK. Living what the heart knows: Learners’ perspectives on compassion cultivation training The University of Arizona. Retrieved from https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/10150/579084/1/azu_etd_14140_sip1_m.pdf http://hdl.handle.net/10150/579084; 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rojas, B., Catalan, E., Diez, G., & Roca, P.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
  • Valencian International University (ES)
Corresponding author
Roca, Pablo
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2023-06-23
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
e0287388
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381839684
Cited by
38
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repositorio Digital de la Universidad Villanueva (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
medical students, psychological distress, burnout, self-compassion, mindfulness, emotion regulation, resilience, empathy, psychological well-being, physician mental health, compassionate care, meditation, COVID-19 worry
MeSH terms
Psychological Distress, COVID-19, Burnout, Professional, Empathy, Humans, Pilot Projects, Stress, Psychological, Students, Medical, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review