Cited by 2,365Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAging and Gerontology Research

Open hearts build lives: Positive emotions, induced through loving-kindness meditation, build consequential personal resources

Open access
Fredrickson, Barbara L., Cohn, Michael A., Coffey, Kimberly A., Pek, Jolynn, Finkel, Sandra M.·2008·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

B. L. Fredrickson's (1998, 2001) broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions asserts that people's daily experiences of positive emotions compound over time to build a variety of consequential personal resources. The authors tested this build hypothesis in a field experiment with working adults (n = 139), half of whom were randomly-assigned to begin a practice of loving-kindness meditation. Results showed that this meditation practice produced increases over time in daily experiences of positive emotions, which, in turn, produced increases in a wide range of personal resources (e.g., increased mindfulness, purpose in life, social support, decreased illness symptoms). In turn, these increments in personal resources predicted increased life satisfaction and reduced depressive symptoms. Discussion centers on how positive emotions are the mechanism of change for the type of mind-training practice studied here and how loving-kindness meditation is an intervention strategy that produces positive emotions in a way that outpaces the hedonic treadmill effect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0013262

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cultivating a nonjudgmental stance may contribute to self-compassion and acceptance, which then increase experiences of positive affect.

    “as self-compassion has been associated with higher positive affect (Frederickson et al., 2008; Wren et al., 2012), cultivating a nonjudgmental stance contribute to self-compassion and acceptance, which then increase experiences of positive affect.”

    From Mapping Mindfulness Facets Onto Dimensions of Anxiety and Depression (2013) · cites this paper as Frederickson et al., 2008

    The paper describes loving-kindness meditation as cultivating warmth and caring for oneself and others (description of LKM; page unavailable), and its Discussion reports increased positive emotions among meditators. It does not report an association between measured self-compassion and positive affect, or establish that a nonjudgmental stance increases affect through self-compassion and acceptance. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interventions designed to promote subjective well-being lead to lasting increases in positive emotions and also promote other positive outcomes such as life satisfaction, purpose in life, and improved social functioning.

    “For example, interventions designed to promote subjective well-being not only lead to lasting increase in positive emotions, but also promote other positive outcomes such as life satisfaction, purpose in life, and improved social functioning (Cohn, Fredrickson, Brown, Mikels, & Conway, 2009; Fredrickson, 2001; Fredrickson, Cohn, Coffey, Pek, & Finkel, 2008).”

    From Trajectories of change in well-being during cognitive behavioral therapies for anxiety disorders: Quantifying the impact and covariation with improvements in anxiety (2020) · cites this paper as Fredrickson, Cohn, Coffey, Pek, & Finkel, 2008

    The Results (Testing the Build Hypothesis; page unavailable) link increased positive emotions during the loving-kindness meditation study to greater purpose in life, social support, positive relations, and life satisfaction. However, the Discussion (Limitations and Future Directions; page unavailable) says positive emotions decreased after the workshop and that the duration of gains needs further study. This paper therefore does not establish the claimed lasting increase in positive emotions. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness may constitute a 'technology of the self' by increasing participants' awareness of internalised oppression, loosening attachment to negative self-constructs and engendering kindlier inner dialogues.

    “This supports the proposition that mindfulness may constitute a 'technology of the self' (Ng, 2016), by increasing participants' awareness of internalised oppression (Berila, 2016), loosening attachment to negative selfconstructs and engendering kindlier inner dialogues (Fredrickson et al., 2008;Dougan, 2011).”

    From Critical Mindfulness in Social Work: Exploring the Potential of Reflexive Self-Care in the Journey from Student to Social Worker (2022) · cites this paper as Fredrickson et al., 2008

    The paper describes loving-kindness meditation as cultivating warmth and caring toward oneself and others, which partly supports the idea of a kindlier relationship with oneself. It does not report that participants loosened attachment to negative self-constructs or developed kindlier inner dialogues. The Discussion also notes that the study found no increase in its measure of compassion. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Practicing Metta is linked to increased resilience and enhanced emotional regulation skills.

    “First evidence has revealed that practicing Metta is linked to increased resilience and enhanced emotional regulation skills [31–33].”

    From Mindfulness and compassion-oriented practices at work reduce distress and enhance self-care of palliative care teams: a mixed-method evaluation of an "on the job" program. (2018) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Discussion (page not available) reports that loving-kindness meditation increased positive emotions, which in turn influenced ego-resilience. The paper also reports increased mindful attention, but it does not establish an improvement in emotional regulation skills specifically. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Existing evidence also suggest that practicing Metta meditation can strongly increase personal resources with self-generated positive emotions being the central mechanism of change.

    “Existing evidence also suggest that practicing Metta meditation can strongly increase personal resources with self-generated positive emotions being the central mechanism of change [31].”

    From Mindfulness and compassion-oriented practices at work reduce distress and enhance self-care of palliative care teams: a mixed-method evaluation of an "on the job" program. (2018) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Discussion reports that loving-kindness meditation increased personal resources through self-generated positive emotions. It also says the shifts in positive emotions “were not large in magnitude,” so the claim’s description of a strong increase overstates the reported findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bryant FB 2003 A scale for measuring beliefs about savoring Journal of Mental Health 12 175 196

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fredrickson, B. L., Cohn, M. A., Coffey, K. A., Pek, J., & Finkel, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2008-11
Volume
95
Issue
5
Pages
1045-1062
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2125750403
Cited by
2,365
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 170 · 2024: 121 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 186 · 2021: 119 · 2020: 227 · 2019: 153 · 2018: 162 · 2017: 172 · 2016: 147 · 2015: 161 · 2014: 142 · 2013: 125 · 2012: 109
FWCI
74.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH59615)
  • Compuware Corporation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
loving-kindness meditation, positive emotions, broaden-and-build theory, personal resources, mindfulness, meaning of life, social support, disease symptoms, life satisfaction, depressive symptoms, hedonic treadmill, working adults
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Awareness, Education, Emotions, Empathy, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Love, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Personality Inventory, Quality of Life, Self Concept, Meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review