Cited by 152Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adherence and factors affecting satisfaction in long-term telerehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine may increase accessibility to pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), thus enhancing long-term exercise maintenance. We aimed to explore COPD patients' adherence and experiences in long-term telerehabilitation to understand factors affecting satisfaction and potential for service improvements. METHODS: A two-year pilot study with 10 patients with COPD was conducted. The intervention included treadmill exercise training at home and a webpage for telemonitoring and self-management combined with weekly videoconferencing sessions with a physiotherapist. We conducted four separate series of data collection. Adherence was measured in terms of frequency of registrations on the webpage. Factors affecting satisfaction and adherence, together with potential for service improvements, were explored through two semi-structured focus groups and an individual open-ended questionnaire. Qualitative data were analysed by systematic text condensation. User friendliness was measured by the means of a usability questionnaire. RESULTS: On average, participants registered 3.0 symptom reports/week in a web-based diary and 1.7 training sessions/week. Adherence rate decreased during the second year. Four major themes regarding factors affecting satisfaction, adherence and potential improvements of the intervention emerged: (i) experienced health benefits; (ii) increased self-efficacy and independence; and (iii) emotional safety due to regular meetings and access to special competence; (iv) maintenance of motivation. Participants were generally highly satisfied with the technical components of the telerehabilitation intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term adherence to telerehabilitation in COPD was maintained for a two-year period. Satisfaction was supported by experienced health benefits, self-efficacy, and emotional safety. Maintenance of motivation was a challenge and might have affected long-term adherence. Four key factors of potential improvements in long-term telerehabilitation were identified: (i) adherence to different components of the telerehabilitation intervention is dependent on the level of focus provided by the health personnel involved; (ii) the potential for regularity that lies within the technology should be exploited to avoid relapses after vacation; (iii) motivation might be increased by tailoring individual consultations to support experiences of good health and meet individual goals and motivational strategies; (iv) interactive functionalities or gaming tools might provide peer-support, peer-modelling and enhance motivation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12911-016-0264-9

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 The steps of analysis in systematic text condensation with examples
Fig. 1 The steps of analysis in systematic text condensation with examplesCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Monthly adherence rate for training sessions and diary registrations with three-month intervals
Fig. 2 Monthly adherence rate for training sessions and diary registrations with three-month intervalsCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Seasonality of adherence rate for training sessions and diary registrations
Fig. 3 Seasonality of adherence rate for training sessions and diary registrationsCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Borg G, Borg E. The Borg CR Scales® folder. Borg Perception: Hasselby, Sweeden; 2010.
  2. Borg G, Borg E. A new generation of scaling methods: Level-anchored ratio scaling. Psychologia. 2001;28:15–45.
  3. Flick U. An introduction to qualitative reserach. 4th ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009.
  4. Malterud K. Kvalitative metoder i medisinsk forskning. 3rd ed. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget AS; 2011.
  5. Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In: Ramachaudran VS, editor. Encyclopedia of human behavior. 4. New York: Academic Press; 1994. p. 71–81.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 152

Metadata

Authors
Hoaas, H., Andreassen, H. K., Lien, L. A., Hjalmarsen, A., & Zanaboni, P.
Affiliations
University Hospital of North Norway (NO)
Corresponding author
Hoaas, Hanne
Venue
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2016-02-25
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
26-26
ISSN
1472-6947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2285434670
Cited by
152
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6
FWCI
12.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Helse Nord RHF (HST1014-11)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, telerehabilitation, pulmonary rehabilitation, exercise adherence, patient satisfaction, remote patient monitoring, self-management, self-efficacy, motivation, emotional safety, videoconferencing, usability, service improvement
MeSH terms
Telerehabilitation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Compliance, Pilot Projects, Self Care, Patient Satisfaction, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review