Cited by 73Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation in home-based online groups: a mixed method pilot study in COPD

Open access
Burkow, Tatjana M., Vognild, Lars K., Johnsen, Elin, Risberg, Marijke Jongsma, Bratvold, Astrid, Breivik, Elin, Krogstad, Trine, Hjalmarsen, Audhild·2015·BMC Research Notes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation is vital in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and is considered for any stage of the disease. Rehabilitation programmes are often centre-based and organised in groups. However, the distance from the patient's home to the centre and lack of transportation may hinder participation. Rehabilitation at home can improve access to care for patients regardless of disease severity. We had previously studied the technology usability and acceptability of a comprehensive home rehabilitation programme designed for patients with very severe COPD receiving long-term oxygen therapy. The acceptability of such comprehensive home programmes for those with less severe COPD, who may be less homebound, is not known. The aims of this feasibility study were to assess patient acceptability of the delivery mode and components of a comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation programme for any stage of COPD, as well as the technology usability, patient outcomes and economic aspects. METHODS: Ten participants with COPD in the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grade I-IV were enrolled in a 9-week home programme and divided into two rehabilitation groups, with five patients in each group. The programme included exercise training and self-management education in online groups of patients, and individual online consultations. The patients also kept a digital health diary. To assess the acceptability of the programme, the patients were interviewed after the intervention using a semi-structured interview guide. In addition the number of sessions attended was observed. The usability of the technology was assessed using interviews and the System Usability Scale questionnaire. The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) was used to measure health-related quality of life. RESULTS: The mode of delivery and the components of the programme were well accepted by the patients. The programme provided an environment for learning from both healthcare professionals and peers, for asking questions and discussing disease-related issues and for group exercising. The patients considered that it facilitated health-enhancing behaviours and social interactions with a social group formed among the participants. Even participants who were potentially less homebound appreciated the home group and social aspects of the programme. The participants found the technology easy to learn and use. The acceptability and usability results were consistent with those in our previous study of patients with very severe COPD. Only the mean change in the SGRQ total score of -6.53 (CI 95 % -0.38 to -12.68, p = 0.04) indicates a probable clinically significant effect. Economic calculations indicated that the cost of the programme was feasible. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation delivered in home-based online groups may be feasible in COPD. The mode of delivery and components of the programme appeared to be acceptable across patients with different disease severity. The results in terms of patient outcomes are inconclusive, and further assessment is needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13104-015-1713-8

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burkow, T. M., Vognild, L. K., Johnsen, E., Risberg, M. J., Bratvold, A., Breivik, E., Krogstad, T., & Hjalmarsen, A.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of North Norway (NO)
  • Northern Research Institute (NO)
  • Northern Norway Regional Health Authority (NO)
  • UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Corresponding author
Burkow, Tatjana M.
Venue
BMC Research Notes
Published
2015-12
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
766-766
ISSN
1756-0500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2191006514
Cited by
73
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Research Notes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, home-based pulmonary rehabilitation, patient acceptability, technology usability, exercise training, self-management education, health-related quality of life, peer support, cost feasibility, health care access, long-term oxygen therapy, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, System Usability Scale
MeSH terms
Aged, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Female, Home Care Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Telemedicine, Internet, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Electronic Mail

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review