Cited by 360Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesMachine Learning in HealthcareAdvanced Text Analysis Techniques

Extracting principal diagnosis, co-morbidity and smoking status for asthma research: evaluation of a natural language processing system

Open access
Zeng, Qing T, Goryachev, Sergey, Weiss, Scott, Sordo, Margarita, Murphy, Shawn N, Lazarus, Ross·2006·BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The text descriptions in electronic medical records are a rich source of information. We have developed a Health Information Text Extraction (HITEx) tool and used it to extract key findings for a research study on airways disease. METHODS: The principal diagnosis, co-morbidity and smoking status extracted by HITEx from a set of 150 discharge summaries were compared to an expert-generated gold standard. RESULTS: The accuracy of HITEx was 82% for principal diagnosis, 87% for co-morbidity, and 90% for smoking status extraction, when cases labeled "Insufficient Data" by the gold standard were excluded. CONCLUSION: We consider the results promising, given the complexity of the discharge summaries and the extraction tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6947-6-30

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cunningham H, Humphreys K, Gaizauskas R, Wilks Y: GATE -a TIPSTER-based General Architecture for Text Engineering. in he TIPSTER Text Program (Phase III) 6 Month Work- shop. Morgan Kaufmann, California; 1997.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeng, Q. T., Goryachev, S., Weiss, S., Sordo, M., Murphy, S. N., & Lazarus, R.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Zeng, Qing T
Venue
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2006-07-26
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
30-30
ISSN
1472-6947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1602694398
Cited by
360
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 29
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (LM008748)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (U54LM008748)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Keywords
natural language processing, clinical text extraction, electronic health records, asthma, discharge summaries, airway disease, extraction accuracy
MeSH terms
Asthma, Humans, Natural Language Processing, Patient Discharge, Sensitivity and Specificity, Smoking, Comorbidity, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, International Classification of Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review