Cited by 21Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseasesPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Oximetry-supported self-management for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mixed method feasibility pilot project

Open access
MacNab, Michele, Lee, Siew Hwa, McCloughan, Lucy, Hanley, Janet, McKinstry, Brian, Pinnock, Hilary·2015·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulse oximetry could potentially contribute to self-monitoring. NHS Lothian's 'Light Touch' service provided COPD patients with a self-management plan based on symptoms and oximetry. The service was overseen (though not actively monitored) by respiratory-trained community teams who were contactable by a telephone helpline. We aimed to assess the feasibility, perceived utility and impact of the 'Light Touch' service. METHODS: A before-and-after assessment of St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and use of healthcare resources during the 6-month feasibility study compared to the previous corresponding 6-months. Paired semi-structured interviews with patients at baseline and 6-months, interviews with managers and a focus group of professionals explored perceptions of the service and self-management. Transcripts were coded, and analysed thematically. RESULTS: We recruited 51 participants (mean age 69.7 years (SD 8.4); 21 (46%) male). 46 participants completed quantitative follow up (2 died, 2 were unwell, 1 refused). SGRQ: 21 (46%) participants improved by 4 or more (the minimum important difference); 12 (26%) deteriorated by 4 or more. HADS: more participants had normal scores for anxiety (65%) and depression (80%) at 6-months than at baseline (51 and 64%). More emergency therapy was prescribed during the study period compared to the previous year. Only 18 participants (39%) contacted the Light Touch Helpline during the 6-month study. Twenty patients provided a total of 36 interviews, 8 clinicians contributed to a focus group and 6 managers were interviewed. Patients considered that the oximetry readings heightened awareness of their condition and gave them confidence to make self-management decisions. Healthcare professionals valued oximetry as a tool for teaching people self-management skills, but were concerned that patients rarely contacted the teams for help or advice during the study. CONCLUSIONS: 'Light Touch' shows promise as a low-cost strategy for empowering patients' self-management skills and reducing reliance on clinical supervision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-015-1135-2

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacNab, M., Lee, S. H., McCloughan, L., Hanley, J., McKinstry, B., & Pinnock, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Limerick (IE)
  • Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
Corresponding author
Pinnock, Hilary
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2015-06
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
485-485
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1953183350
Cited by
21
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Access Institutional Repository at Robert Gordon University (Robert Gordon University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Access Institutional Repository at Robert Gordon University (Robert Gordon University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Edinburgh and Lothians Health Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulse oximetry, self-management, patient self-monitoring, telephone helpline, patient empowerment, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, anxiety and depression, health care utilization, feasibility, patient perspectives
MeSH terms
Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Oximetry, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Hotlines, Focus Groups, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review