Cited by 32Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareReproductive Health and ContraceptionHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

The effect of a preconception care outreach strategy: the Healthy Pregnancy 4 All study

Open access
Sijpkens, Meertien K., van Voorst, Sabine F., de Jong-Potjer, Lieke C., Denktaş, Semiha, Verhoeff, Arnoud P., Bertens, Loes C. M., Rosman, Ageeth N., Steegers, Eric A. P.·2019·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preconception care has been acknowledged as an intervention to reduce perinatal mortality and morbidity. However, utilization of preconception care is low because of low awareness of availability and benefits of the service. An outreach strategy was employed to promote uptake of preconception care consultations. Its effect on the uptake of preconception care consultations was evaluated within the Healthy Pregnancy 4 All study. METHODS: We conducted a community-based intervention study. The outreach strategy for preconception care consultations included four approaches: (1) letters from municipal health services; (2) letters from general practitioners; (3) information leaflets by preventive child healthcare services and (4) encouragement by peer health educators. The target population was set as women aged 18 to 41 years in 14 Dutch municipalities with relatively high perinatal morbidity and mortality rates. We evaluated the effect of the outreach strategy by analyzing uptake of preconception care consultations between February 2013 and December 2014. Registration data of applications for preconception care as well as participant questionnaires were obtained for analysis. RESULTS: The outreach strategy led to 587 applications for preconception care consultations. The majority of applications (n = 424; 72%) were prompted by the invitation letters (132,129) from the municipalities and general practitioners. The effect of the municipal letter seemed to fade out after 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Outreach strategies amongst the general population promote uptake of preconception care consultations, although on a small scale and with a temporary effect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-019-3882-y

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies aimed to implement preconception care (PCC) programs and some successfully led to an improved level of knowledge regarding PCC and subsequent improved periconceptional lifestyle behaviours.

    “Several studies aimed to implement PCC programs and some successfully led to an improved level of knowledge regarding PCC and subsequent improved periconceptional lifestyle behaviours [7, 18–20].”

    From Associations between periconceptional lifestyle behaviours and adverse pregnancy outcomes (2021) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Methods describe an implemented PCC outreach strategy, and the Conclusion reports a small, temporary increase in PCC uptake. The Results describe participants’ existing knowledge, but the paper does not report improved knowledge or subsequent improvements in periconceptional lifestyle behaviours. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sijpkens, M. K., van Voorst, S. F., de Jong-Potjer, L. C., Denktaş, S., Verhoeff, A. P., Bertens, L. C. M., Rosman, A. N., & Steegers, E. A. P.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • GGD Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Sijpkens, Meertien K.
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2019-01-23
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
60-60
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921228549
Cited by
32
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
8.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport (318 804)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
preconception care, outreach strategies, perinatal morbidity, perinatal mortality, invitation letters, peer health educators, general practitioners, municipal health services, preventive child health care, women of reproductive age, community-based intervention
MeSH terms
Facilities and Services Utilization, Adolescent, Adult, Child Health Services, Child, Preschool, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Netherlands, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Preventive Health Services, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Preconception Care, Young Adult, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review