Cited by 150Health Policy Implementation ScienceEvaluation and Performance AssessmentPublic Health Policies and Education

The Tug-of-War: Fidelity Versus Adaptation Throughout the Health Promotion Program Life Cycle

Bopp, Melissa, Saunders, Ruth P., Lattimore, Diana·2013·The Journal of Primary Prevention

Abstract

Researchers across multiple fields have described the iterative and nonlinear phases of the translational research process from program development to dissemination. This process can be conceptualized within a "program life cycle" framework that includes overlapping and nonlinear phases: development, adoption, implementation, maintenance, sustainability or termination, and dissemination or diffusion, characterized by tensions between fidelity to the original plan and adaptation for the setting and population. In this article, we describe the life cycle (phases) for research-based health promotion programs, the key influences at each phase, and the issues related to the tug-of-war between fidelity and adaptation throughout the process using a fictionalized case study based on our previous research. This article suggests the importance of reconceptualizing intervention design, involving stakeholders, and monitoring fidelity and adaptation throughout all phases to maintain implementation fidelity and completeness. Intervention fidelity should be based on causal mechanisms to ensure effectiveness, while allowing for appropriate adaption to ensure maximum implementation and sustainability. Recommendations for future interventions include considering the determinants of implementation including contextual factors at each phase, the roles of stakeholders, and the importance of developing a rigorous, adaptive, and flexible definition of implementation fidelity and completeness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10935-013-0299-y

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers have often conceptualized sustainability as the final stage in the overall life cycle of an intervention, including development, adoption, implementation, and sustainability.

    “Researchers have often conceptualized sustainability as the final stage in the overall life cycle of an intervention, including development, adoption, implementation (with potential adaptations), and sustainability (14, 31, 52, 110, 115, 118).”
  • One challenge inherent in studying sustainability is the tension between the continuation of interventions as originally developed and the need to adapt them for use in contexts and populations that may differ from those originally tested and that change over time.

    “Therefore, one challenge inherent in studying sustainability is the tension between the continuation of interventions as originally developed and the need to adapt them for use in contexts and populations that may differ from those originally tested and that change over time (7, 14, 23, 118, 122).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bopp, M., Saunders, R. P., & Lattimore, D.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Bopp, Melissa
Venue
The Journal of Primary Prevention
Published
2013-03-23
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
193-207
ISSN
  • 0278-095X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6547
OpenAlex
W2087834176
Cited by
150
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
12.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Primary Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
program life cycle, implementation fidelity, health promotion programs, translational research, program dissemination, program adoption, program implementation, program sustainability, stakeholder engagement, intervention design, causal mechanisms, contextual factors
MeSH terms
Diffusion of Innovation, Health Promotion, Humans, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Organizational Case Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review