Cited by 17Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchSex and Gender in HealthcarePharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Sex differences in the management of persons with dementia following a subnational primary care policy intervention

Open access
Sourial, Nadia, Arsenault-Lapierre, Geneviève, Margo-Dermer, Eva, Henein, Mary, Vedel, Isabelle·2020·International Journal for Equity in Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The influence of sex and gender on the risk of dementia, its clinical presentation and progression is increasingly being recognized. However, current dementia strategies have not explicitly considered sex and gender differences in the management of dementia to ensure equitable care. The objective of this study was to examine the moderating effect of sex on the quality of care following the implementation of the Quebec Alzheimer Plan (QAP). METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the evaluation of the QAP consisting of a retrospective chart review of 945 independent, randomly-selected patient charts of males and females 75+ years old with dementia and a visit to one of 13 participating Family Medicine Groups before (October 2011-July 2013) and after (October 2014 - July 2015). The quality of dementia care score, based on Canadian and international recommendations and consensus guidelines, consisted of documented assessments in 10 domains. We used a mixed linear regression model to measure the interaction between sex and the implementation of the QAP on the quality of dementia care score, adjusting for age and number of medications. RESULTS: We found that improvements in the quality of dementia care following the QAP were larger for men than women (mean difference = 4.97; 95%CI: 0.08, 9.85). We found that men had a larger improvement in four indicators (driving assessments, dementia medication management, Alzheimer Society referrals, and functional status evaluation), while women had a smaller improvement in three (home care needs, behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, and weight). Men were prescribed fewer anticholinergics post-QAP, while women were prescribed more. Cognitive testing improved in men but decreased for women following the QAP; the opposite was observed for caregiver needs. CONCLUSION: While the overall quality of care improved after the implementation of the QAP, this study reveals differences in dementia management between men and women. While we identified areas of inequalities in the care received, it is unclear whether this represents inequities in access to care and health outcomes. Future research should focus on better understanding sex and gender-specific needs in dementia to bridge this gap and better inform dementia strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12939-020-01285-2

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]World Health Organization. Women and Health: Today’s Evidence Tomorrows Agenda. Geneva: WHO Press; 2009.
  2. [33]Third Canadian Consensus Conference on diagnosis and treatment of dementia Montreal2007 [Available from: http://www.cccdtd.ca/pdfs/Final_Recommendations_CCCDTD_2007.pdf.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sourial, N., Arsenault-Lapierre, G., Margo-Dermer, E., Henein, M., & Vedel, I.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Sourial, Nadia
Venue
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published
2020-10-06
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
175-175
ISSN
1475-9276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3091909259
Cited by
17
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal for Equity in Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • The Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging
  • Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
dementia care, sex differences, gender differences, primary care policy, quality of care, health equity, older adults, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, caregiver needs, cognitive assessment, home care needs
MeSH terms
Aged, Dementia, Female, Health Policy, Humans, Male, Primary Health Care, Quebec, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review