Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 819

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 217 of the 217 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Liquid biopsy: a step closer to transform diagnosis, prognosis and future of cancer treatments

Open access
Lone, Saife N., Nisar, Sabah, Masoodi, Tariq, Singh, Mayank, Rizwan, Arshi, Hashem, Sheema, El-Rifai, Wael, Bedognetti, Davide, Batra, Surinder K., Haris, Mohammad, Bhat, Ajaz A., Macha, Muzafar A.·2022·Molecular Cancer

Abstract

Over the past decade, invasive techniques for diagnosing and monitoring cancers are slowly being replaced by non-invasive methods such as liquid biopsy. Liquid biopsies have drastically revolutionized the field of clinical oncology, offering ease in tumor sampling, continuous monitoring by repeated sampling, devising personalized therapeutic regimens, and screening for therapeutic resistance. Liquid biopsies consist of isolating tumor-derived entities like circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA, tumor extracellular vesicles, etc., present in the body fluids of patients with cancer, followed by an analysis of genomic and proteomic data contained within them. Methods for isolation and analysis of liquid biopsies have rapidly evolved over the past few years as described in the review, thus providing greater details about tumor characteristics such as tumor progression, tumor staging, heterogeneity, gene mutations, and clonal evolution, etc. Liquid biopsies from cancer patients have opened up newer avenues in detection and continuous monitoring, treatment based on precision medicine, and screening of markers for therapeutic resistance. Though the technology of liquid biopsies is still evolving, its non-invasive nature promises to open new eras in clinical oncology. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the current methodologies involved in liquid biopsies and their application in isolating tumor markers for detection, prognosis, and monitoring cancer treatment outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12943-022-01543-7

Cites

217 of 217 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 217 references

Cited by

See all 819

Metadata

Authors
Lone, S. N., Nisar, S., Masoodi, T., Singh, M., Rizwan, A., Hashem, S., El-Rifai, W., Bedognetti, D., Batra, S. K., Haris, M., Bhat, A. A., & Macha, M. A.
Venue
Molecular Cancer
Published
2022-03-18
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
79-79
ISSN
1476-4598 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220764901
Cited by
819
References
217
FWCI
57.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liquid biopsy: a step closer to transform diagnosis, prognosis and future of cancer treatments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12943-022-01543-7
The paper
Lone, S. N., Nisar, S., Masoodi, T., Singh, M., Rizwan, A., Hashem, S., El-Rifai, W., Bedognetti, D., Batra, S. K., Haris, M., Bhat, A. A., & Macha, M. A. (2022). Liquid biopsy: a step closer to transform diagnosis, prognosis and future of cancer treatments. Molecular Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-022-01543-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.