Cited by 237Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and Validation

Reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale

Open access
Sousa, Tiago V, Viveiros, Vânia, Chai, Maria V, Vicente, Filipe L, Jesus, Gustavo, Carnot, Maria J, Gordo, Ana C, Ferreira, Pedro L·2015·Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Generalized anxiety disorder has a strong impact on health-related quality of life. For this reason, it seems relevant to develop strategies allowing early diagnoses in order to promote appropriate treatments. The objective of this study was to culturally adapt and validate the GAD-7 for the Portuguese patients with generalized anxiety disorder. METHODS: For the cultural adaptation of the Portuguese version of the GAD-7 scale we started with a previous translation made by Mapi Institute and decided to perform a clinical review followed by a cognitive debriefing with patients. Once piloted, this version was then tested in a larger sample for feasibility and reliability (1-week test-retest). Construct validity was assessed by the relationship between GAD-7 and socio-demographic and clinical variables. Its unidimensionality was tested by principal component factor analysis. Criterion validity was assessed by comparing GAD-7 scores with those obtained by HADS, and EQ-5D. STAI was mainly used as a screening indicator for patient inclusion. RESULTS: GAD-7 was considered feasible with a mean completion time of 2.3 minutes and no major floor or ceiling effects. We found an excellent Cronbach's alpha internal consistency score (0.880) and the test-retest and interclass correlation coefficients were also very good. Regarding the construct validity, younger patients, those with higher education, employed and without anxiety symptoms revealed lower GAD-7 scores, meaning better health. The unidimensionality of GAD-7 index was also confirmed by principal component factor analysis. At last, GAD-7 was significantly correlated with other health outcome indices and the classification levels created by it and by HADS showed to be dependent. CONCLUSION: The excellent metric properties confirmed the cultural adaptation and validity of GAD-7 into Portuguese population, allowing the clinicians an early detection and treatment of these patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12955-015-0244-2

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Primary outcomes anxiety and depression will be measured using PHQ-9 and GAD-7.

    “The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (Torres et al., 2016) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) (Sousa et al., 2015) will be used to measure anxiety and depression, respectively, throughout the study.”

    From A guided internet-delivered individually-tailored ACT-influenced cognitive behavioural intervention to improve psychosocial outcomes in breast cancer survivors (iNNOVBC): Study protocol (2019) · cites this paper as Sousa et al., 2015

    The citation to Sousa et al. is attached to GAD-7. Although the supplied paraphrase describes GAD-7 as measuring anxiety, the citing sentence says PHQ-9 and GAD-7 measure anxiety and depression, respectively. The paper’s Methods (‘Description of GAD-7’) instead identifies GAD-7 as a screening and severity measure for generalized anxiety disorder. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]Acquadro C Jambon B Ellis D Marquis P Spilker B Language and translation issues Quality of Life and Parmacoeconomics in Clinical Trrials 1996 Philadelphia Lippincott-Raven Publishers 575 85

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sousa, T. V., Viveiros, V., Chai, M. V., Vicente, F. L., Jesus, G., Carnot, M. J., Gordo, A. C., & Ferreira, P. L.
Affiliations
  • Pfizer (Portugal) (PT)
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
Corresponding author
Ferreira, Pedro L
Venue
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published
2015-04-25
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
50-50
ISSN
1477-7525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116817969
Cited by
237
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, GAD-7, generalized anxiety disorder, Portuguese translation, cultural adaptation, psychometric validation, test-retest reliability, construct validity, criterion validity, unidimensionality, early diagnosis, health-related quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Portugal, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Socioeconomic Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Principal Component Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review