Cited by 154COVID-19 and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMental Health Treatment and Access

Impact on mental health due to covid-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional study in Portugal and Brazil.

Open access
Passos, Lígia, Prazeres, Filipe, Teixeira, Andreia, Martins, Carlos·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Mental health effects secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic were till recently considered less important or were neglected. Portugal and Brazil are facing the pandemic in quite different ways. This study aimed to describe the mental health status of the general adult population in Portugal and Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic and analyze the differences between the two countries. A cross-sectional quantitative study was based on an online questionnaire. Socio-demographic data were collected in addition to four validated scales: CAGE (acronym cut-annoyed-guilty-eye) Questionnaire, Satisfaction with Life Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-2. For each outcome, a multiple linear regression was performed. Five hundred and fifty people answered the questionnaire (435 women). The median age was 38 (Q1, Q3: 30, 47) years, 52.5% resided in Brazil and 47.5% in Portugal. The prevalence of anxiety was 71.3% (mild anxiety was present in 43.1%), the prevalence of depression was 24.7% and 23.8% of the sample had both depression and anxiety. Isolation was a significant factor for depression but not for anxiety. Well-being was below average. Mental illness was considerably higher than pre-COVID-19 levels. Portugal and Brazil will have to be prepared for future consequences of poor mental health and contribute immediate psychological support to their adult populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17186794

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent data concerning immediate psychological impact among Portuguese individuals suggest that participants reported higher levels of moderate to severe symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress than previously.

    “recent data concerning immediate psychological impact among Portuguese individuals suggest that participants reported higher levels of moderate to severe symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress than previously (Passos et al., 2020; Paulino et al., 2020; Moreira et al., 2021).”

    From Dealing With the Pandemic of COVID-19 in Portugal: On the Important Role of Positivity, Experiential Avoidance, and Coping Strategies (2021) · cites this paper as Passos et al., 2020

    The Results and Conclusions (pages not provided) report moderate and severe anxiety and say mental illness was more prevalent than before COVID-19 in Portugal and Brazil. However, the figures are for a combined Portuguese–Brazilian sample, depression is not classified by severity, and stress was not measured. The study also did not collect participants’ prior mental-health status, so it cannot establish that these participants’ symptoms had increased. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]Peixoto V.R. Vieira A. Aguiar P. Carvalho C. Thomas D. Abrantes A. Rapid assessment of the impact of lockdown on the COVID-19 epidemic in Portugal medRxiv 2020 10.1101/2020.05.26.20098244 33160423 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Passos, L., Prazeres, F., Teixeira, A., & Martins, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Aveiro (PT)
  • University of Beira Interior (PT)
  • Centre for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Prazeres, Filipe
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-09-17
Volume
17
Issue
18
Pages
6794
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3084662312
Cited by
154
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
11.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
This article was supported by National Funds through FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia,I.P., within CINTESIS, R&D Unit ((reference UIDB/4255/2020).)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, mental health, anxiety, depression, isolation, well-being, life satisfaction, CAGE questionnaire, GAD-7, PHQ-2, Portugal, Brazil, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Anxiety, Brazil, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Portugal, Stress, Psychological, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review