Cited by 64Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietSchool Health and Nursing Education

Revising on the run or studying on the sofa: prospective associations between physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and exam results in British adolescents

Open access
Corder, Kirsten, Atkin, Andrew J., Bamber, Diane J., Brage, Soren, Dunn, Valerie J., Ekelund, Ulf, Owens, Matthew, van Sluijs, Esther M. F. +1 more·2015·International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated prospective associations between physical activity/sedentary behaviour (PA/SED) and General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) results in British adolescents. METHODS: Exposures were objective PA/SED and self-reported sedentary behaviours (screen (TV, Internet, Computer Games)/non-screen (homework, reading)) measured in 845 adolescents (14·5y ± 0·5y; 43·6 % male). GCSE results at 16y were obtained from national records. Associations between exposures and academic performance (total exam points) were assessed using multilevel mixed-effects linear regression adjusted for mood, BMI z-score, deprivation, sex, season and school; potential interactions were investigated. RESULTS: PA was not associated with academic performance. One-hour more accelerometer-assessed SED was associated with (β(95 % CI)) 6·9(1·5,12·4) more GCSE points. An extra hour of screen time was associated with 9.3(-14·3,-4·3) fewer points whereas an extra hour of non-screen time (reading/homework) was associated with 23·1(14·6,31·6) more points. Screen time was still associated with poorer scores after adjusting for objective PA/SED and reading/homework. CONCLUSIONS: An extra hour/day of screen time at 14·5y is approximately equivalent to two fewer GCSE grades (e.g., from B to D) at 16y. Strategies to achieve the right balance between screen and non-screen time may be important for improving academic performance. Concerns that encouraging more physical activity may result in decreased academic performance seem unfounded.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12966-015-0269-2

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corder, K., Atkin, A. J., Bamber, D. J., Brage, S., Dunn, V. J., Ekelund, U., Owens, M., van Sluijs, E. M. F., & Goodyer, I. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Corder, Kirsten
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Published
2015-09-04
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
106-106
ISSN
1479-5868 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099023585
Cited by
64
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
6.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (acceptedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (074296/Z/04/Z)
  • UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
physical activity, sedentary behavior, screen time, academic performance, examination results, GCSE, adolescents, homework, reading, accelerometer-measured sedentary time
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Computers, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Measurement, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Prospective Studies, Schools, Television, Exercise, Internet, Sedentary Behavior, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review