Cited by 45Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Efficacy and safety of duloxetine versus placebo in adolescents with juvenile fibromyalgia: results from a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Upadhyaya, Himanshu P., Arnold, Lesley M., Alaka, Karla, Qiao, Meihua, Williams, David, Mehta, Renata·2019·Pediatric Rheumatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no medications approved for the treatment of juvenile fibromyalgia (JFM). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of duloxetine 30/60 mg once daily (QD) versus placebo in adolescents with JFM. METHODS: In this Phase 3b, multisite (US, Argentina, Puerto Rico, and India) trial, patients aged 13-17 years with JFM and a score of ≥4 on the Brief Pain Inventory-Modified Short Form: Adolescent Version (BPI) 24-h average pain severity score were randomized to duloxetine or placebo for the 13-week double-blind period. The starting duloxetine dose was 30 mg, with a target dose of 60 mg QD, as tolerated. The primary endpoint was the mean change in 24-h average pain severity of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) from baseline to Week 13, analyzed using mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM) technique. Secondary measures were BPI severity and interference scores; treatment response (≥30%, ≥50% reductions on BPI average pain severity); Pediatric Pain Questionnaire; Clinical Global Impression of Severity: Overall and Mental Illness scales; Functional Disability Inventory: child and parent versions; Children's Depression Inventory; Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children; and safety and tolerability. Continuous secondary efficacy measures were analyzed using analysis of covariance or MMRM, and categorical data using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and Fisher's exact test, where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients with JFM received duloxetine (N = 91) or placebo (N = 93), of which 149 patients (81.0%) completed the 13-week double-blind treatment period. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups; majority of the patients were Caucasian (77.17%) and females (75.0%), with a mean age of 15.53 years. For the primary measure, BPI average pain severity, the mean change was not statistically different between duloxetine and placebo (- 1.62 vs. -0.97, respectively; p = .052). For secondary efficacy outcomes, statistically significantly more duloxetine- versus placebo-treated patients had a treatment response (≥30% and ≥50% reductions on BPI average pain severity) and improvement of the general activity and relationships items on the BPI interference subscale. The percentage of patients reporting at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event was higher in the duloxetine versus placebo groups (82.42% vs. 62.37%, respectively; p = .003). The overall safety profile of duloxetine in this study was similar to that reported previously in duloxetine pediatric trials of other indications. CONCLUSIONS: The primary study outcome, mean change in 24-h BPI average pain severity rating from baseline to Week 13, did not significantly improve with duloxetine compared to placebo in patients with JFM. However, significantly more patients on duloxetine compared to placebo had a ≥30% and ≥50% reduction in pain severity. There were no new safety concerns related to duloxetine in the study population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01237587 . Registered 08 November, /2010.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12969-019-0325-6

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. [4]Gómez-de-Regil L Álvarez-Nemegyei J Open access scientific evidence of cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with fibromyalgia Actualidades en Psicología 2016 30 91 102 10.15517/ap.v30i121.24579 · DOI
  2. [5]Gedalia A Garcia CO Molina JF Bradford NJ Espinoza LR Fibromyalgia syndrome: experience in a pediatric rheumatology clinic Clin Exp Rheumatol 2000 18 3 415 419 10895386
  3. [6]Varni JW Burwinkle TM Limbers CA Szer IS The PedsQL as a patient-reported outcome in children and adolescents with fibromyalgia: an analysis of OMERACT domains Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007 5 9 10.1186/1477-7525-5-9 17295915 PMC1802070 · DOI
  4. [8]Cleeland CS Ryan KM Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory Ann Acad Med Singap 1994 23 2 129 138 8080219
  5. [9]Arnold LM Lu Y Crofford LJ Wohlreich M Detke MJ Iyengar S A double-blind, multicenter trial comparing duloxetine with placebo in the treatment of fibromyalgia patients with or without major depressive disorder Arthritis Rheum 2004 50 9 2974 2984 10.1002/art.20485 15457467 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [10]Arnold LM Rosen A Pritchett YL D'Souza DN Goldstein DJ Iyengar S A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of duloxetine in the treatment of women with fibromyalgia with or without major depressive disorder Pain. 2005 119 1–3 5 15 10.1016/j.pain.2005.06.031 16298061 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [11]Russell IJ Mease PJ Smith TR Kajdasz DK Wohlreich MM Detke MJ Efficacy and safety of duloxetine for treatment of fibromyalgia in patients with or without major depressive disorder: results from a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose trial Pain. 2008 136 3 432 444 10.1016/j.pain.2008.02.024 18395345 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [12]Chappell AS Bradley LA Wiltse C Detke MJ D'Souza DN Spaeth M A six-month double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of duloxetine for the treatment of fibromyalgia Int J Gen Med 2008 1 91 102 10.2147/IJGM.S3979 20428412 PMC2840539 · DOI
  9. [13]Arnold LM Zhang S Pangallo BA Efficacy and safety of duloxetine 30 mg/d in patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study Clin J Pain 2012 28 9 775 781 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182510295 22971669 · DOI
  10. [14]Arnold LM Schikler KN Bateman L Khan T Pauer L Bhadra-Brown P Safety and efficacy of pregabalin in adolescents with fibromyalgia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and a 6-month open-label extension study Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2016 14 1 46 10.1186/s12969-016-0106-4 27475753 PMC4967327 · DOI
  11. [15]Arnold LM Bateman L Palmer RH Lin Y Preliminary experience using milnacipran in patients with juvenile fibromyalgia: lessons from a clinical trial program Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2015 13 27 10.1186/s12969-015-0025-9 26112278 PMC4480575 · DOI
  12. [16]Strawn JR Prakash A Zhang Q Pangallo BA Stroud CE Cai N A randomized, placebo-controlled study of duloxetine for the treatment of children and adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2015 54 4 283 293 10.1016/j.jaac.2015.01.008 25791145 · DOI
  13. [17]Emslie GJ Wells TG Prakash A Zhang Q Pangallo BA Bangs ME Acute and longer-term safety results from a pooled analysis of duloxetine studies for the treatment of children and adolescents with major depressive disorder J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2015 25 4 293 305 10.1089/cap.2014.0076 25978741 · DOI
  14. [18]Choy EH Mease PJ Kajdasz DK Wohlreich MM Crits-Christoph P Walker DJ Safety and tolerability of duloxetine in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia: pooled analysis of data from five clinical trials Clin Rheumatol 2009 28 9 1035 1044 10.1007/s10067-009-1203-2 19533210 PMC2721139 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Upadhyaya, H. P., Arnold, L. M., Alaka, K., Qiao, M., Williams, D., & Mehta, R.
Affiliations
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Syneos Health (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Upadhyaya, Himanshu P.
Venue
Pediatric Rheumatology
Published
2019-05-28
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
27-27
ISSN
1546-0096 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947666403
Cited by
45
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Rheumatology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
juvenile fibromyalgia, duloxetine, adolescents, pain intensity, Brief Pain Inventory, treatment response, functional disability, depression, anxiety, adverse events, drug safety, SSRI antidepressants, pediatric chronic pain, placebo comparison, treatment-emergent adverse events, treatment discontinuation, pain interference
MeSH terms
Duloxetine Hydrochloride, Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors, Adolescent, Analgesics, Analysis of Variance, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Male, Pain Measurement, Prospective Studies, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review