Cited by 59Vagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchStress Responses and CortisolNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Vagus nerve stimulation modulates hippocampal inflammation caused by continuous stress in rats

Open access
Namgung, Uk, Kim, Ki-Joong, Jo, Byung-Gon, Park, Jong-Min·2022·Journal of Neuroinflammation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) can attenuate inflammatory responses in peripheral tissues and also improve some neurological disorders and cognitive function in the brain. However, it is not clear how VNS is involved in neuropathological processes in brain tissues. Here, we investigated the regulatory effects of VNS on the production of proinflammatory cytokines in the hippocampus of an animal model of continuous stress (CS). METHODS: CS was induced by placing rats in cages immersed with water, and acute or chronic electrical stimulation was applied to the cervical vagus nerve of CS animals. Protein levels in the gastric and hippocampal tissues were measured by western blotting and protein signals analyzed by immunofluorescence staining. von Frey test and forced swimming test were performed to assess pain sensitivity and depressive-like behavior in rats, respectively. RESULTS: Levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in the gastric and hippocampal tissues were significantly increased in CS animals compared to the untreated control and downregulated by acute VNS (aVNS). Iba-1-labeled microglial cells in the hippocampus of CS animals revealed morphological features of activated inflammatory cells and then changed to a normal shape by VNS. VNS elevated hippocampal expression of α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (α7 nAChR) in CS animals, and pharmacological blockade of α7 nAChR increased the production of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, thus suppressing cholinergic anti-inflammatory activity that was mediated by VNS. Chronic VNS (cVNS) down-regulated the hippocampal production of active form of caspase 3 and 5-HT1A receptors and also decreased levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in the gastric and hippocampal tissues of CS animals. Pain sensitivity and depressive-like behavior, which were increased by CS, were improved by cVNS. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that VNS may be involved in modulating pathophysiological processes caused by CS in the brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12974-022-02396-z

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The efferent vagal system can stimulate release of acetylcholine to reduce inflammation and stop the cascading cycle of oxidative damage and inflammation.

    “The efferent vagal system can stimulate release of acetylcholine to reduce inflammation and stop the cascading cycle of oxidative damage and inflammation (Pavlov et al., 2003; Namgung et al., 2022).”

    From Biobehavioral and psychosocial stress changes during three 8–12 month spaceflight analog missions with Mars-like conditions of isolation and confinement (2022) · cites this paper as Namgung et al., 2022

    The Background (page unavailable) says acetylcholine released from efferent vagal fibers inhibits proinflammatory cytokine expression. The Discussion reports that vagus nerve stimulation reduced inflammatory cytokines in stressed rats and separately mentions reactive oxygen species, but it does not show that the stimulation stops a cycle of oxidative damage and inflammation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Cobb S, et al., editors. Hippocampal microcircuits, Springer series in computational neuroscience 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Namgung, U., Kim, K.-J., Jo, B.-G., & Park, J.-M.
Affiliations
Daejeon University (KR)
Corresponding author
Namgung, Uk
Venue
Journal of Neuroinflammation
Published
2022-02-02
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
33-33
ISSN
1742-2094 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210747529
Cited by
59
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroinflammation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
ministry of education (NRF-2018R1A6A1A03025221, NRF-2016R1D1A1B01014190)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
vagus nerve stimulation, hippocampal inflammation, chronic stress, inflammatory cytokines, TNF-α, IL-1β, interleukin-6, microglial activation, alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, caspase-3, 5-HT1A receptor, depression-like behavior, pain sensitivity, gastritis
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Inflammation, Vagus Nerve, Rats, Vagus Nerve Stimulation, alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review