Cited by 25Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusBacterial Infections and VaccinesInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

Spatial and temporal variation of routine parameters: pitfalls in the cerebrospinal fluid analysis in central nervous system infections

Open access
Djukic, Marija, Lange, Peter, Erbguth, Frank, Nau, Roland·2022·Journal of Neuroinflammation

Abstract

The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space is convoluted. CSF flow oscillates with a net flow from the ventricles towards the cerebral and spinal subarachnoid space. This flow is influenced by heartbeats, breath, head or body movements as well as the activity of the ciliated epithelium of the plexus and ventricular ependyma. The shape of the CSF space and the CSF flow preclude rapid equilibration of cells, proteins and smaller compounds between the different parts of the compartment. In this review including reinterpretation of previously published data we illustrate, how anatomical and (patho)physiological conditions can influence routine CSF analysis. Equilibration of the components of the CSF depends on the size of the molecule or particle, e.g., lactate is distributed in the CSF more homogeneously than proteins or cells. The concentrations of blood-derived compounds usually increase from the ventricles to the lumbar CSF space, whereas the concentrations of brain-derived compounds usually decrease. Under special conditions, in particular when distribution is impaired, the rostro-caudal gradient of blood-derived compounds can be reversed. In the last century, several researchers attempted to define typical CSF findings for the diagnosis of several inflammatory diseases based on routine parameters. Because of the high spatial and temporal variations, findings considered typical of certain CNS diseases often are absent in parts of or even in the entire CSF compartment. In CNS infections, identification of the pathogen by culture, antigen detection or molecular methods is essential for diagnosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12974-022-02538-3

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Detection of enteroviral RNA in the CSF is a direct indicator of CNS involvement.

    “The detection of enteroviral RNA in the CSF is therefore a direct indicator of CNS involvement (23–25).”

    From Pathogen detection in acellular cerebrospinal fluid: diagnostic insights from a pediatric cohort in Colombia (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Conclusions (page not available) say that diagnosing CNS infection relies on identifying the causative pathogen by culture or molecular methods, supporting the general diagnostic point. The passages do not specifically address enteroviral RNA in CSF or state that its detection is a direct indicator of CNS involvement. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [2]Felgenhauer K Beuche W Labordiagnostik neurologischer Erkrankungen: Liquoranalytik und -zytologie, Diagnose- und Prozessmarker 1999 Stuttgart Thieme
  2. [3]Dorta Contreras AJ Reibergrams: essential element in cerebrospinal fluid immunological analysis Rev Neurol 1999 28 996 998 10416239
  3. [27]Merritt HH Fremont-Smith F The cerebrospinal fluid 1937 Philadelphia WB Saunders
  4. [45]Frick E Scheid-Seydel L Untersuchungen mit J131-markiertem Albumin über Austauschvorgänge zwischen plasma und liquor cerebrospinalis Klin Wochenschr 1958 36 66 69 13540120
  5. [81]Nau R Schuchardt V Prange HW Listeriosis of the central nervous system Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 1990 58 408 422 2279727

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Djukic, M., Lange, P., Erbguth, F., & Nau, R.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
  • Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität (DE)
Corresponding author
Nau, Roland
Venue
Journal of Neuroinflammation
Published
2022-07-06
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
174-174
ISSN
1742-2094 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283838116
Cited by
25
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroinflammation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geriatrie
  • Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
cerebrospinal fluid, cerebrospinal fluid flow, rostrocaudal gradient, central nervous system infection, lactate, cerebrospinal fluid culture, antigen detection, molecular diagnosis
MeSH terms
Brain, Central Nervous System Infections, Cerebral Ventricles, Ependyma, Humans, Spinal Cord

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review