Cited by 19Amphibian and Reptile BiologyPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsOcean Acidification Effects and Responses

The impact of elevated temperature and CO2 on growth, physiological and immune responses of Polypedates cruciger (common hourglass tree frog)

Open access
Weerathunga, W. A. Manasee T., Rajapaksa, Gayani·2020·Frontiers in Zoology

Abstract

Background: Amphibians are one of the most susceptible groups to climate change as their development occurs in aquatic environments or in microhabitats with high humidity. Accordingly, our primary objective was to investigate the chronic physiological responses seen in early larval to adult stages of Polypedates cruciger(Common hourglass tree frog) to future climate change based on continuous exposure to elevated temperature and elevated CO 2-induced low water pH. Free-swimming and free-feeding tadpoles were observed until metamorphosis under four experimental treatments; two elevated temperatures, one elevated CO 2(reduced pH) and a control maintained at ambient temperature (29 °C ± 1 °C) and CO 2(pH = 7). Elevated temperature treatments were maintained at 32 °C ± 0.5 °C and 34 °C ± 0.5 °C to represent respectively, the future climate scenarios RCP2.6 (Representative Concentration Pathway 2.6, the ‘base-case’ scenario) and RCP8.5 (‘business-as-usual’ scenario) according to the 5 th Assessment Report of the IPCC. Elevated CO 2 treatment was maintained within the pH range of 5.5–5.6 representing the range expected between RCP8.5 and RCP2.6. Results: Compared to the control, elevated CO 2 accelerated phenological progression of tadpoles through Gosner stages, thus resulting in lower body size at metamorphosis. Both elevated temperatures significantly delayed the development and reduced the growth of tadpoles. 100% mortality was observed in 34 °C treatment before metamorphosis (before Gosner stage 36) while all the tadpoles died after metamorphosis (at Gosner stage 46) in 32 °C treatment. Elevated CO 2 increased tadpole activity, in terms of their swimming speed, while both of the elevated temperatures reduced it compared to the control. Catalase activity increased at elevated CO 2. Ammonia excretion by tadpoles was decreased by elevated CO 2, but increased under temperature elevation. Both Elevated CO 2 and temperature treatments reduced the white blood cell count and its percentage of thrombocytes. Percentages of lymphocytes, monocytes and neutrophils were increased at 32 °C, while lymphocyte percentage and lysozyme activity were increased at elevated CO 2. Several deformities were observed in tadpoles at elevated temperature and CO 2. Conclusions: Elevated temperatures and reduced pH due to elevated CO 2, being major features of climate change, increase the vulnerability of amphibians, who are already one of the most threatened vertebrate groups. Based on our observations on the model amphibian species P. cruciger, increased vulnerability to climate change occurs by reducing their growth, body size and motility while also reducing their immunity and inducing physical deformities. These impacts are highly-likely to reduce the foraging, competitive and reproductive capabilities in their natural habitats. We conclude further that even the ‘best-case’ scenario of future climate change can impose significant physiological impacts that could threaten amphibian populations on broader spatial and temporal scales. Graphical abstract:

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12983-019-0348-3

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 119 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weerathunga, W. A. M. T., & Rajapaksa, G.
Affiliations
University of Kelaniya (LK)
Corresponding author
Rajapaksa, Gayani
Venue
Frontiers in Zoology
Published
2020-01-13
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
3-3
ISSN
1742-9994 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014051277
Cited by
19
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Zoology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
Keywords
high temperature, elevated CO2, ocean acidification, low pH, tadpole development, metamorphosis, growth, swimming speed, catalase activity, ammonia excretion, immune response, leukocytes, lysozyme activity, tadpole mortality, amphibian physiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review