The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The H2 robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation after stroke: early findings from a clinical study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Stroke significantly affects thousands of individuals annually, leading to considerable physical impairment and functional disability. Gait is one of the most important activities of daily living affected in stroke survivors. Recent technological developments in powered robotics exoskeletons can create powerful adjunctive tools for rehabilitation and potentially accelerate functional recovery. Here, we present the development and evaluation of a novel lower limb robotic exoskeleton, namely H2 (Technaid S.L., Spain), for gait rehabilitation in stroke survivors. METHODS: H2 has six actuated joints and is designed to allow intensive overground gait training. An assistive gait control algorithm was developed to create a force field along a desired trajectory, only applying torque when patients deviate from the prescribed movement pattern. The device was evaluated in 3 hemiparetic stroke patients across 4 weeks of training per individual (approximately 12 sessions). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Houston. The main objective of this initial pre-clinical study was to evaluate the safety and usability of the exoskeleton. A Likert scale was used to measure patient's perception about the easy of use of the device. RESULTS: Three stroke patients completed the study. The training was well tolerated and no adverse events occurred. Early findings demonstrate that H2 appears to be safe and easy to use in the participants of this study. The overground training environment employed as a means to enhance active patient engagement proved to be challenging and exciting for patients. These results are promising and encourage future rehabilitation training with a larger cohort of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The developed exoskeleton enables longitudinal overground training of walking in hemiparetic patients after stroke. The system is robust and safe when applied to assist a stroke patient performing an overground walking task. Such device opens the opportunity to study means to optimize a rehabilitation treatment that can be customized for individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02114450 ).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biomechanics and motor control of human movement
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-2135 · Cited by 8,451
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Tsao, C. W., Aday, A. W., Almarzooq, Z. I., Anderson, C. A. M., Arora, P., Avery, C. L., Baker-Smith, C. M., Beaton, A. Z., Boehme, A. K., Buxton, A. E., et al. (2023) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001123 · Cited by 8,300
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2011 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Roger, V. L., Go, A. S., Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Adams, R. J., Berry, J. D., Brown, T. M., Carnethon, M. R., Dai, S., de Simone, G., Ford, E. S., et al. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e3182009701 · Cited by 6,149
Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement
Winter, D. A. (2009) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470549148 · Cited by 6,066
Feigin, V. L., Lawes, C. M., Bennett, D. A., Barker-Collo, S. L., & Parag, V. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70025-0 · Cited by 2,855
Mozaffarian, D., Benjamin, E. J., Go, A. S., Arnett, D. K., Blaha, M. J., Cushman, M., Das, S. R., de Ferranti, S., Després, J.-P., Fullerton, H. J., et al. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000366 · Cited by 2,466
Lower Extremity Exoskeletons and Active Orthoses: Challenges and State-of-the-Art
Dollar, A. M., & Herr, H. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2008.915453 · Cited by 1,327
Design and Evaluation of the LOPES Exoskeleton Robot for Interactive Gait Rehabilitation
Veneman, J. F., Kruidhof, R., Hekman, E. E. G., Ekkelenkamp, R., Van Asseldonk, E. H. F., & van der Kooij, H. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2007.903919 · Cited by 1,280
Biomechanical design of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX)
Zoss, A. B., Kazerooni, H., & Chu, A. (2006) · IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · doi:10.1109/tmech.2006.871087 · Cited by 1,170
Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: The copenhagen stroke study
Jørgensen, H. S., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H. O., & Olsen, T. S. (1995) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80038-7 · Cited by 1,164
Cited by
Systematic review on wearable lower-limb exoskeletons for gait training in neuromuscular impairments
Rodríguez-Fernández, A., Lobo-Prat, J., & Font-Llagunes, J. M. (2021) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-021-00815-5 · Cited by 435
Deep Learning Approaches for Enhanced Lower-Limb Exoskeleton Control: A Review
Belal, M., Alsheikh, N., Aljarah, A., & Hussain, I. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3414175 · Cited by 42
Eicher, C., Haesner, M., Spranger, M., Kuzmicheva, O., Gräser, A., & Steinhagen-Thiessen, E. (2019) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.2017.1352051 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Bortole, M., Venkatakrishnan, A., Zhu, F., Moreno, J. C., Francisco, G. E., Pons, J. L., & Contreras-Vidal, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
- Published
- 2015-06-17
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-54
- ISSN
- 1743-0003 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1580648284
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 16.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The H2 robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation after stroke: early findings from a clinical study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s12984-015-0048-y
- The paper
- Bortole, M., Venkatakrishnan, A., Zhu, F., Moreno, J. C., Francisco, G. E., Pons, J. L., & Contreras-Vidal, J. L. (2015). The H2 robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation after stroke: early findings from a clinical study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0048-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.