Cited by 171Mental Health Treatment and AccessStudent Stress and CopingHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

University students’ use of mental health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Osborn, T. G., Li, S., Saunders, R., Fonagy, P.·2022·International Journal of Mental Health Systems

Abstract

Background: International estimates suggest around a third of students arrives at university with symptoms indicative of a common mental disorder, many in late adolescence at a developmentally high-risk period for the emergence of mental disorder. Universities, as settings, represent an opportunity to contribute to the improvement of population mental health. We sought to understand what is known about the management of student mental health, and asked: (1) What proportion of students use mental health services when experiencing psychological distress? (2) Does use by students differ across health service types? Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines using a Context, Condition, Population framework (CoCoPop) with a protocol preregistered on Prospero (CRD42021238273). Electronic database searches in Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC and CINAHL Plus, key authors were contacted, citation searches were conducted, and the reference list of the WHO World Mental Health International College Student Initiative (WMH-ICS) was searched. Data extraction was performed using a pre-defined framework, and quality appraisal using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Data were synthesised narratively and meta-analyses at both the study and estimate level. Results: 7789 records were identified through the search strategies, with a total of 44 studies meeting inclusion criteria. The majority of included studies from the USA (n = 36), with remaining studies from Bangladesh, Brazil, Canada, China, Ethiopia and Italy. Overall, studies contained 123 estimates of mental health service use associated with a heterogeneous range of services, taking highly variable numbers of students across a variety of settings. Discussion: This is the first systematic quantitative survey of student mental health service use. The empirical literature to date is very limited in terms of a small number of international studies outside of the USA; studies of how services link together, and of student access. The significant variation we found in the proportions of students using services within and between studies across different settings and populations suggests the current services described in the literature are not meeting the needs of all students.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13033-022-00569-0

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 PRISMA flow diagram
Fig. 1 PRISMA flow diagramCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Forest plot for overall mental health service use by population group
Fig. 2 Forest plot for overall mental health service use by population groupCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Forest Plot for outpatient overall service use by population group
Fig. 3 Forest Plot for outpatient overall service use by population groupCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Forest Plot for overall residential service use
Fig. 4 Forest Plot for overall residential service useCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Drapeau A, Marchand A, Beaulieu-Prévost D. Epidemiology of psychological distress. Ment Illn Understand Predict Control. 2012;69(2):105–6.
  2. Kahlenberg R, Shireman R, Quick K, et al. Policy strategies for pursuing adequate funding of community college. New York: The Century Foundation; 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Osborn, T. G., Li, S., Saunders, R., & Fonagy, P.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Osborn, T. G.
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Published
2022-12-17
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
57-57
ISSN
1752-4458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312067515
Cited by
167
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 27
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North Thames
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
student mental health, mental health service utilization, university students, psychological distress, help-seeking, common mental disorders, access to mental health care, adolescent mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review